TK-8252 Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 Originally posted by DarthDurp and you can't spell 'republican' without 'liar', lol Uh, yes I can. Re-pub-li-can.
DarthDurp Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 RepubLIcAn (take out the capitalized letters) R L I A (re-arrange them) And boom! you get LIAR so, no you can't
TK-8252 Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 Originally posted by DarthDurp RepubLIcAn (take out the capitalized letters) R L I A (re-arrange them) And boom! you get LIAR so, no you can't Whatever, rat is spelt out and emphasized right in the word. DemocRAT.
El Sitherino Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 I wish we could go back to like the 1800's when it was Democratic-Republican, before that partisan split crap.
VanLingo Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 Maybe you can -- I'll bet those dead people who wanted to vote for Gore would love to run for Senate.
El Sitherino Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 ... why do you insist on being such a prick?
VanLingo Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 I believe that is a flame. lol, gotta love the SWB.net moderation.
El Sitherino Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 and unjustly calling someone a racist isn't? also, I believe I have a reason to call you such, it's not so much an attack as a general statement that you just keep going out of your way to upset people.
VanLingo Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 Hey, Mr. Smart InsaneSith -- this whole THREAD was made to upset people! Wake up.
El Sitherino Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 ... not really. this was a place for non-republicans to come, just like that republicans come here thread was for republicans, just some people have a hard time keeping out of other peoples business, and I'm sorry that one of our fellows invaded y'alls conversation and started the debate. oh and thanks for correcting my grammar.
SkinWalker Posted August 2, 2004 Author Posted August 2, 2004 If you are referring to me, I've voted Republican more times than I ever have Democrat or Independant. In fact, Reagan was the first President I voted for (second term... I was too young in the first). Wouldn't that mean that I was "invited?"
El Sitherino Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 Originally posted by SkinWalker If you are referring to me, I've voted Republican more times than I ever have Democrat or Independant. In fact, Reagan was the first President I voted for (second term... I was too young in the first). Wouldn't that mean that I was "invited?" touche, and should McCain be the designated Republican running for president in 2008 I will definitely vote for him, keeping in mind he still has his stances on issues that he does now. And hopefully he'll have that good sense of humour still. and I was talking more about that darthdrup fellow.
yaebginn Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 I'm glad the thread I made turned into what it did. It allowed democrats to share thier opinion. and has tunred into a heated debate on several topics, gay marriage, religion, and politics. its a super-thread.
DarthDurp Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 yeah, i started the debate, and im not saying sorry. since the times of Aristotle debate has been what brings all ideas together to get what's best for their society. I still believe in this concept sooo much, that those of you who make it a point to personally attack people during the debate should wake up and realize that debating is not made for you to look good, but it's made to get what's best for the country. if anything, i upholded the american spirit by starting that debate. btw, if McCain runs for pres in 2008, he better pray that Hilary Clinton dosen't run, cause she'll thrash him. Whether you like her or not, she would destroy McCain, and i'm a fan of McCain!
yaebginn Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 I'm not mad at u, I appreciate it. and no, she wouldnt.
yaebginn Posted August 2, 2004 Posted August 2, 2004 I wish I could live in my dream world. Then I'd be a Jedi and I would slice and dice so many people.
SkinWalker Posted August 3, 2004 Author Posted August 3, 2004 I have to agree with yaebginn. While I think H. Clinton would bring a lot to race between her and McCain, I think that McCain would take it by a large margin. We probably don't agree on why, however. I think that the nation is far to bigotted to tolerate a female President. Vice-President, perhaps. But not a President.
DarthDurp Posted August 3, 2004 Posted August 3, 2004 trust me, i agree all to well that this country is very bigoted. but if you think about it, the people that wouldn't vote for clinton for being a woman are the ones that wouldn't vote for her, even if she was a man! i really don't think she'll be losing any votes because everybody knows the dems would vote for her, and so would the fence-sitters. why? because they will realize that she is the husband of a former presiedent that created 22 million jobs and a $300 billion surplus.
yaebginn Posted August 3, 2004 Posted August 3, 2004 amd cheated on his wife, and didnt catch Osama when he could've. I mean, clinton was a horrible prsidnet.
ET Warrior Posted August 3, 2004 Posted August 3, 2004 Originally posted by yaebginn amd cheated on his wife, and didnt catch Osama when he could've. I mean, clinton was a horrible prsidnet. He was a horrible president because he cheated on his wife? You do realize that affected the well-being of our country approximately zero? And you may also note, that your friend Bush hasn't caught Osama either. He seems to have forgotten about him even AFTER he made a direct attack against the US.
DarthDurp Posted August 3, 2004 Posted August 3, 2004 How many people were hurt by Clinton cheating on his wife? Three! Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea. What you need to understand is how good of a president someone is has absolutely nothing to do with their moral beliefs. Heck, FDR had a dozen mistresses and he was married, and he was a teriffic president dealing with WWII. JFK, who single-handedly evaded an all out war with the Soviet Union had an affair with Marilyn Monroe. You can't tell me Clinton wasn't a good president because of him cheating on his wife, after all he did for the economy.
yaebginn Posted August 3, 2004 Posted August 3, 2004 Clinton was just a horrible president in general, not just because he cheated. he was also a liar and a sleaze in gneral/
El Sitherino Posted August 3, 2004 Posted August 3, 2004 Originally posted by yaebginn Clinton was just a horrible president in general, not just because he cheated. he was also a liar and a sleaze in gneral/ ... weren't you complaining about bush bashing from kerry? doesn't this seem a bit hypocritical?
yaebginn Posted August 3, 2004 Posted August 3, 2004 I am not complaing. I like it when Bush basjhes kerry.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.