Admiral Odin Posted November 24, 2004 Author Share Posted November 24, 2004 Well there are two ways to do this time skip. 1. Normal way everyone gets older. This could be interesting the group not getting anywhere with the quest and just chasing false leads. As to Hal turning into Flax, that could happen but it is not very hard to see him turning into someone compeltely different. 2. The group gets caught in a time bubble where time moves slowly for them. The get out of the bubble and twenty years have passeed, for them it seems like a day or a week (etc). This option in my opinion has a lot of fun possibilities to offer. With Hal & Drago: Hal thinking hes been out of touch for a week, not twenty years returns to find Drago who believed he was dead. Then finding the galaxy is now a giant slave labor camp to make things worse. We've been leaning towards this one (at least in the past we have). Also if you could start making an outline for what you would like to happen in Taris (Going to tie in anything from KOTOR?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwing Posted November 24, 2004 Share Posted November 24, 2004 Tarsis Admiral. Not Taris. BD: I agree with you, which is why I don't like the idea of #1 at all and have always basically planned on #2. By the way, there are a couple ways to do the 'time bubble' as well. 1: The schism happens because it's part of the quest itself. It is keyed to the 'quest-identifier' magic inside the group, and as time jumps forward for them it will jump forward for everyone with that magic - including Misae, and Drago if he stays with the group for much longer (long enough for the magic to transfer over). 2: The schism happens because of somewhere the group goes. It affects only those in that certain place/situation. Anyone separated from the group (ex: Misae) would stay in the normal time frame and age as such. Reason it could most conveniently happen next thread is because #2.2 would work best there. So many ways I could have the group stumble into something to cause that in my dimension/while dimension traveling. Why do you think the Middle Ages of my world connects with Mrear, while 2000+ connects with the current SW universe? Schisms in time thanks to an unstable artificial dimension plane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleDog Posted November 24, 2004 Share Posted November 24, 2004 I haven't played KOTOR, my PC is bellow the spec:( Okay, well I have a rough concept of Tarsis, since I was going to send Flax there. The world it's self is roughly Earth-like, there are four main continants and a lot of islands. Most of the equatorial region is desert and the polar caps are quite extensive. The planet has two moons which opperate on a 22 day cycle with the second, smaller, moon roughly 4 days behind the first. Mostly the Agamarians work in the northern hemesphire becuase this provides them with the neccessary raw materials to make their weapons. (This is mainly to do with the longbows.) I was thinking of having an army of around 90,000 on the planet. This would compose 2 regular Northern Compact Legions, stats for those are in this thread; 4 war Levies. These are like legions but they have no house guards, about half the number of cavalvy and billmen and three times the longbow men. In addition there will be a Cup of Winds Legion (Sophae's people), this Legion is roughly the same as a compact legion but with no billmen. Instead they have 800 heavy militia cavalry. Then I was thinking a mixed Legion of the other peoples on Agamar, including Carr'nessa and Relinion. That should be interesting for Matt and Allessa. Then I was going to have about 500 Noble Warriors (Heavy Cav) to make up the numbers. As to what will happen when they land: The normal MO is for a group to come in fast, offload in 15-20 minutes and then for the ship to get space bourne fast. As soon as they enter the atmosphere power levels will begin to drop, so speed is important. As soon as the group land they will be attacked by whatever is near by. The only safe spots on the planet are stone circles. Something about the stones keeps the natives away. Now a ship landing will obviously also attract the Agamarians. My vision of the planet is mainly rough moorland and hills with thick forests, rivers, marshes. Think Dark Age Britain. Now there are lots of ancient ruins around so the key is probably in one of those. My general outline goes. Group land ---> Group attacked and meet Legions. ---> Group get embroualed in 25-1 battle. ---> group go search for key in ruins with detachment of Housegaurds. ---> Thats as far as I've got with it so far. Aside from that I have one thought. River Styx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Odin Posted November 24, 2004 Author Share Posted November 24, 2004 And how closely will you keep to the true "river Styx" Something for you to think about for the purpose of this planet. are the three Drakes. I'm thinking about having them go with Drago as the Aesirian emisaries (sort of). They could phycisally land ships, and bring them back to orbit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleDog Posted November 25, 2004 Share Posted November 25, 2004 The issue then though would be that the ships reactors would be drained. I would say that sending the Drakes alone would be unwise. Now I'll go into my thoughts on "Dragons" There are three types: A. Flightless Dragons, usually measuring 15-25m in length these are basicall lizzards with short, powerfull legs, they part and run part sliver accross the ground and are only about as fast as a man. They have very mobile tales with spiked ends and they breath fire. They are difficult to kill because of their armoured scales and because the only "weak" spot is on the belly. They usually have to be stopped by battledogs with force forged blades, unless you find a way to get at the belly. B. Man Dragons, believed to be crossbred with some other creature. They are bipedal, with man like bodies and dragon heads with redused snouts, they stand around 2m tall, some have tales and wings, all breath fire. They are considered dangerous but most houseguards would be expected to take one down. C. Winged Dragon, basically the classic European Dragon, standing around 10-15m tall and between 20-30m long in flight. The breath fire, they ruin your day. It is the privilage of the Dragonsbain to slay these creatures. Dragonsbain: A subdevision of most Noble Orders these men are equipped in the same way as others but carry compound bows, the arrows for which are each Force-forged, they have the finest armour and the best horses. When not fighting dragons they are a dominating and virtually undefeatable battlefield force. They can usually be recognised by their destinctive dragon's scale shields, which they earn after their first kill. Of the 30,000 odd Battledogs only two tumae (80) are Dragonsbain. So you can see why the Agamarians won't be too keen on the Drakes. As to the Styx: The Homeric version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Odin Posted November 27, 2004 Author Share Posted November 27, 2004 But would they be willing to work with the Drakes? What about the other rivers of Hades BD: Acheron - the river of woe Cocytus - the river of lamentation Phlegethon - the river of fire Lethe - the river of forgetfulness Those could also be entertaining... Also I want the group to return to Coruscant after this time skip, and probably before Tarsis. Couple of reasons why: 1. So knew people can join (that was the point of Yevoth) 2. The group has seen Corsuscant mainly untouched. After twenty years the planet will be in ruins for the most part. Think along the lines of many post-apocalypse movies. I think it would be interesting for the group to see first hand how much Coruscant has suffered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Writer Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Admiral, I want to make sure Elaina joins the group before any time skipping happens... she is Tanara's younger sister, both physically and mentally. I want it to stay that way. If you're planning Coruscant after the skip, where can I have Elaina run into the rest of us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleDog Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Agamarians are pragmatic, they'll be willing to work with the Drakes but they have to be brought round to it. If one just appeared then all hell fould break loose. Admiral, have you read the Odyssey? Or even the Aeneid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Odin Posted November 29, 2004 Author Share Posted November 29, 2004 WJ: At the beginning of the next thread. The group will be landing at a planet where they can meet. BD: The Odyssey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleDog Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Off Topic: Admiral, what was your opinion of the resourceful Odysseus? As an aside I wouldn't really recomend the Aeneid. On Topic: That image is what I want the group to experiance. Having to meet theri dead relatives will be a real eye opener, I think, for all involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Odin Posted November 29, 2004 Author Share Posted November 29, 2004 It's been a coule years since reading it so I'm a little rusty on certain facts. Odysseus seemed to be very resourceful, and came up with some clever idea on how to escape certain difficulties (I paticularly like him adopting the name "Nohbody". Although if not for Athena he would have died early on. His penchant for bragging was also interesting. What about you? (and what version did you read? I read the translation by Seamus Heaney) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleDog Posted November 30, 2004 Share Posted November 30, 2004 I read E.V Rieu. I liked him but his willingness to hop into any bed while still being totally devoted to his wife was a bit.... odd. He certainly owes his survival (and his troubles) to the Gods. The Scenes in the Palace are great and the ones in the underworld are genuinly creepy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Odin Posted November 30, 2004 Author Share Posted November 30, 2004 I liked how it showed a double standard in society. Woman had to be chaste while men could sleep with whoever they wanted. The palace scene was nice and interesting, I liked how Odysseus took his revenge on the suiters. I watched a movie based on the Odyssey and they butchered the story and Odysseus. They made him into an arrogant idiot who took delight in flipping off the gods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jokemaster Posted November 30, 2004 Share Posted November 30, 2004 I saw oh brother where art thou.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleDog Posted November 30, 2004 Share Posted November 30, 2004 *Ignores JM* Yes, the double standard it a good point. Whats more interesting is the beafy matcho characters, versus the effeminate Classical Greeks. As to film versions, bear in mind that the poem takes 36 odd hours to sing. FYI if Odysseus really existed he would have been over sixe feet tall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Odin Posted November 30, 2004 Author Share Posted November 30, 2004 That is no excuse for destroying the story BD. The version I saw was horrid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jokemaster Posted November 30, 2004 Share Posted November 30, 2004 Originally posted by BattleDog *Ignores JM* Yes, the double standard it a good point. Whats more interesting is the beafy matcho characters, versus the effeminate Classical Greeks. As to film versions, bear in mind that the poem takes 36 odd hours to sing. FYI if Odysseus really existed he would have been over sixe feet tall. They're ignoring me. NOW'S MY CHANCE *Unleashes plan to take over the cantina universe* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwing Posted November 30, 2004 Share Posted November 30, 2004 I liked Oh Brother Where Art Thou. I liked the Odyssey more, although I haven't read it in five-six years. =) Saw the (an?) Odyssey movie a few years ago, didn't like it either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleDog Posted December 1, 2004 Share Posted December 1, 2004 Originally posted by Admiral That is no excuse for destroying the story BD. The version I saw was horrid. That is exactly why it should never havre even have been considered for a film, look at what they did to the Illiad with Troy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Odin Posted December 1, 2004 Author Share Posted December 1, 2004 Haven't seen Troy yet, so I really can't comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwing Posted December 1, 2004 Share Posted December 1, 2004 It was pretty horrid. Despite excellent (and attractive ^_~) actors, the storyline was butchered. All the gods were taken out of the story for the sake of 'realism', and some important plot details were altered for (what I can only assume to be) the sake of drama. (especially the ending...gah) That, and the music was annoying and trying too hard to be 'epic' (along with, arguably, much of the dialogue). I'd love to see an Illiad/Odyssey movie done properly, for pretty much the same reasons I loved the Lord of the Rings films. I shouldn't even be posting now, I have a major school project due later today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleDog Posted December 1, 2004 Share Posted December 1, 2004 Troy wasn't even realistic, armour, shields, helmets and weapons were all remenisant of Classical Greece, not the badass Mycenaeans. So, like King Arthur, it fails in both catagories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Odin Posted December 1, 2004 Author Share Posted December 1, 2004 I haven't seen the latest King Aruthor movie either but at least it had some celtic references from the trailers that I did see. Unlike some of the ones made. I really like it when they make a movie with knights who wear armor so heavy that they cann't stand up when they fall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwing Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 Originally posted by BattleDog Troy wasn't even realistic, armour, shields, helmets and weapons were all remenisant of Classical Greece, not the badass Mycenaeans. Ya, but I didn't mind or even really notice that (so I'll take your word for it ^_~). What really appealed to me were the Greek ships. They always were among my favorite designs as a kid (which is when I studied the Greeks...I was a bookish child ) and so the opening scene of the trailer showing the vast fleet of beautiful Greek ships covering the sea...the cool music, the voiceover, the shots of the actors (I like pretty much all the major actors in this film, so shoot me)... It's just a real pity that the movie wasn't half as good as the trailer. (Actually, there were some pretty good parts to the movie...couldn't save the overall piece, though.) Oh, and curious, how were the Classical Greeks "effeminate"? Still not sure what you meant by that...please don't tell me you're from the school of thought that says anything in males resembling what Western culture now sees as 'feminine' is a bad thing Wow, we're way off discussing PtH by now. Back on subject, superthrawn is really swamped and not able to post much right now (especially since he's got so much catch-up...) He'll probably have Ritchet pop back in apologizing for being pulled away, later on. Convenient when you have a character who can do that at a moment's notice...don't have to worry about another coma like Josine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleDog Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 Classical Greeks were gay, they didn't like women and thier ideal of beuty is the male form. In addition they spent a lot of time writing boks and bitching. By Comparrison Ancient Greeks spent most of their time pillaging, killing, making war, and women appear alot more in art. They also had way cooler swords. So really its a comparrison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.