rhinomatt Posted January 7, 2006 Author Share Posted January 7, 2006 I think the sith whouldn't destroy one city, they whould destroy all. Do you remember Malak's words? "Destroy the entire planet". That means: at best for Taris - to destroy all the cities, at worst - turn a planet into asteroid field. Just as Han Solo sad in the "New Hope" - "They whould need thousands of ships" (or something like that, I have localised version). Perhaps the sith had thousands of ships. Yes they has hundreds of thousands of ships just at taris this is because the starforge was making thousands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jae Onasi Posted January 7, 2006 Share Posted January 7, 2006 I wouldn't want to see _all_ non-fighting planets, anymore than I'd like to see _all_ fighting planets. I think doing the sidequests, learning the NPCs' stories, etc., is just as fun as getting the bad guys, and a good mix of this would be best. Now, I don't mind if some planets have more or less fighting, as long as it balances out generally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhinomatt Posted January 8, 2006 Author Share Posted January 8, 2006 I've understood rhinomatt... Yes, I'd like to. It's because not every planet has war or something on it. And a neutral status (like on Maanan) is a... part of an athmosphere. Exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JediMaster12 Posted January 9, 2006 Share Posted January 9, 2006 I would actually like more sidequest adventures to develop characters. It doesn't matter about fighting/nonfighting, though like veryone has said, Taris was a nice balance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth InSidious Posted January 9, 2006 Share Posted January 9, 2006 Mix. Too much fighting gets dull (Nar Shadaa, Enclave Sublevel). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.