devildog13 Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 saw a thread that mentioned spartans vs rc's and was gonna comment on it but some1 closed the thread anyway I think ppl missed the fact that originally the spartans were supposed to be deployed in squads when the spartan II project first came to be. a four man spartan squad vs a four man rc squad would definitely be an interesting fight and I think that whoever won would have have to be extremely dependent on luck and looking for one mistake that the others might make. if u wanna talk about a 1o1 fight then think about master chief vs null before you think about the rc's. nulls have a lot more independence and initiative [sorry, small darkred text on a gray background is really hard on the eyes!] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halo_92 Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 masta cheif would win we already established that i think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devildog13 Posted January 24, 2008 Author Share Posted January 24, 2008 honestly i think it would really depend on the situation...both are really good at what they do...the only difference between Spartans and Clones is that Clones age faster cause of what the Kaminoans did with their genes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dracus296 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 well if i was a clone trooper i would jst shove a thermal det down his spart throte and detonate it by shoting a hole in his spleen with a sniper rifle!!!!!!!=) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dracus296 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 well if i was a clone trooper i would jst shove a thermal det down his spart throte and detonate it by shoting a hole in his spleen with a sniper rifle!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dracus296 Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 my bad about double reply comp went wak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron Rose Posted February 10, 2008 Share Posted February 10, 2008 eh, Master Cheif is way over-rated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeDoe 2.0 Posted February 10, 2008 Share Posted February 10, 2008 ^ I pity the fool that said that [/Mr. T] Spartan would win hands down, although the commandos would really put a helluva fight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron Rose Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 Thanks for your pitty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabretooth Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 The commandos would win, provided I'm playing and I've got cheats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
black_hayate Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 my bad about double reply comp went wak Well now it's tripple posting, rofl. Use edit. Personally I think if Commandos had all the weapons they could use at clone wars vs Spartans. Greeks would be pwnt. They had no ranged weapons to start with... then, they had no future tactics, which probably were way more effective than phalanx... Good luck in predicting next time . Well but if it was one squad vs 300 spartans.. they might run out of ammo... then the stairs starts . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devildog13 Posted February 13, 2008 Author Share Posted February 13, 2008 except i'm not talking about spartans from 300...i'm talking about the ones from Halo... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Nizzemancer] Posted February 15, 2008 Share Posted February 15, 2008 honestly i think it would really depend on the situation...both are really good at what they do...the only difference between Spartans and Clones is that Clones age faster cause of what the Kaminoans did with their genes... They don't age fast after they've grown to full maturity, that was just a way to breed a large army very fast. And Commandos would win, and they would win easily if I was playing them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da_man Posted February 16, 2008 Share Posted February 16, 2008 It all depends on what weps the spartans have. I mean, if they had H1 Assault rifle or a plasma pistol, they're screwed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devildog13 Posted February 23, 2008 Author Share Posted February 23, 2008 yeah but in all honesty who would try to play h1 spartans against rc's??? I'd put the H2 Spartans and weapons against rc's. both games came out around the same time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General LiWar Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 considering master chief recharges health without bacta, he wins if he gets that opportunity. however, with me controlling it'd probably be a double KO...and that would be SWEET Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da_man Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 considering master chief recharges health without bacta, he wins if he gets that opportunity. however, with me controlling it'd probably be a double KO...and that would be SWEET As far as I know, The chief only regenerates his shields, but I only have Halo 1, but then the Spartans and RC are fairly matched. I wish the chief was in SSBB, which comes out this weekend! w00t! w00t! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General LiWar Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 As far as I know, The chief only regenerates his shields, but I only have Halo 1, but then the Spartans and RC are fairly matched. I wish the chief was in SSBB, which comes out this weekend! w00t! w00t! Yeah, Halo 2 and 3 don't have the health packs, just regeneration Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da_man Posted March 10, 2008 Share Posted March 10, 2008 Yeah, Halo 2 and 3 don't have the health packs, just regeneration Never played those two, since I don't have Vista and don't have an Xbox. Halo 2 only works on vista. :thumbs down: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gen. Cockaroach Posted March 11, 2008 Share Posted March 11, 2008 First off I love Republic Commando, it was a game SW needed to have and need to continue. Here is my opinion, Commandos operate as a team and MasterChief is the lone soldier (not good to hang around with). I personally like the Tom Clancy like gameplay. Now if it was a one on one, I would bet money on the Commando Armaments: Commando:Blaster, Grenade Launcher, Sniper rifle and a pistol. Then the optional fifth weapon. Flashbangs (love those), dentanators(?), the ECs, and those remote grenades. And all of the wonderful trap mines (limited to only how many barrels are around. Masterchief: (Can only carry two weapons and eight grenades) I would say he would carry a battle rifle and a SMG. Now already the Commando has more firepower than MasterChief. But wait MasterChief was trained since he was six. I do not know his age but I would say about 20 years. The Commado was trained for ten years and then gained another two years with the Clone Wars. Now there is hand to hand combat, MC does the hit with whatever is in his hands. While the Commandos have that knife. Which does major damage to regular troops. So in hand to hand I would have to go for Commando, he can swing that knife faster than MC swings his weapon. Now the COs weapons are electric (plasma like aspect with the electrons) so MCs shield will be drained quickly. And with a remote mine this fight would be over quickly. Now MCs weapons are projectile which are not that effective against shields, which means more shots and more exposure to the COs fire as well. Honestly if MC had an advantage over a CO the CO will have enough firepower to keep MC at bay while he waits for his shields recharge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halo_92 Posted March 11, 2008 Share Posted March 11, 2008 it you seriously think a commando would win, then you haven't played much halo. The alien you fight fight in halo are like eight feet tall; were the aliens in commando[except for super battle droid] are five feet tall. and that weapon choice sucks also, If he has a sword then the commando is screwed, plus fire granades and other new crap from halo three. also spartans were trained to work as a team, it just so happened that the spartan base on reach got pearl harbored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gen. Cockaroach Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 I own Halo 1 and Halo 2 and beat both games about a dozen times each on legendary. I know all of the weapons and Aliens in those games. And guess what, there is only one spartan in the games (I haven't read the books for I am not that addicted to the storyline of Halo) so there is no team and Masterchief is an individual fighter. MC with a sword eh? I personally hate the sword but I know its capabilities and say that a sniper round to a head would end or some remote grenades. For Masterchief needs to get close and that would be difficult. Remember the Commandos also carry a grenade launcher that is almost like a rocket launcher vs Sword. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordOfTheFish Posted April 5, 2008 Share Posted April 5, 2008 Reps FTW. Clones PWN! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sev_vode an Posted August 7, 2008 Share Posted August 7, 2008 Commandos definately i've read the halo and commando books. in the end the clones would totally win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RC-1183 Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 ya no question about it mc maybe taller but he can only carry 2 weapons for one while RCs can carry 4 weapons also 4-1 also helps the RCs and who needs a sword when u got vibro blades ka-cha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.