Sam! Posted April 14, 2009 Posted April 14, 2009 Before I got my Xbox 360, I had The Force Unleashed on my PS2, before I traded it in at EB Games and got it for 360. Anyways, (and correct me if I'm wrong) I noticed some differences between the two versions. The levels (even though I've only played the first few on 360) are completely different, and that even starts at the Prologue. Anybody else noted this?
Shem Posted April 14, 2009 Posted April 14, 2009 Yes, the PS3, and Xbox 360 versions are totally different than the ones on the Wii, PS2, etc.
Shem Posted April 14, 2009 Posted April 14, 2009 Do you have any idea why that is?Because the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions were made a different development team than the Wii, PS2, etc, versions.
Sam! Posted April 14, 2009 Author Posted April 14, 2009 I guess that makes sense. Personally I found the PS2 version much easier.
LordOfTheFish Posted April 15, 2009 Posted April 15, 2009 You may have also noticed a significant difference in the graphics.
KotorMacModder Posted April 24, 2009 Posted April 24, 2009 Yeah, Xbox 360 had much better graphics. Also, in the Wii, PS2, and PSP versions, The Apprentice holds his saber normally, while in the XBOX 360 and PS3 versions he holds his saber backhand, almost as if he were missing the front part of a double bladed lightsaber
WraithPrince Posted April 24, 2009 Posted April 24, 2009 I never understood why he holds it backwards, if he was holding the saber normally he could swing faster and you'd have a better grip/ more strength in a saber lock...
SW01 Posted April 25, 2009 Posted April 25, 2009 Also, in the Wii, PS2, and PSP versions, The Apprentice holds his saber normally, while in the XBOX 360 and PS3 versions he holds his saber backhand, almost as if he were missing the front part of a double bladed lightsaber I never understood why he holds it backwards, if he was holding the saber normally he could swing faster and you'd have a better grip/ more strength in a saber lock... It's to do with his particular sabre form. Can't remember the name of it offhand, but it's discussed at great length here. Personally, I didn't like the aesthetics of the style, and would have preferred the stance used in the other formats.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.