Jump to content

Home

I love this game, How about you?

gavan

By gavan
in Galactic Discussion

Recommended Posts

gavan Newbie

gavan

Posted
Posted

Well I've been playing this games for about a month, and It kicks-A$$. I love the game. I know it's base on the old AOK engine, but it has so much more detail then you could ever get on a new 3D engine. Plus I love the unique artwork of each civ. This game beats AOK anyday. So much more fun then AOKs any one who hasn't bought the FULL game, and is a RTS fan should love this game. This game Kicks A$$ Lucas Art. Best game yet you made, Keep it up. Anyone agree with me? :D

StephenG Newbie

StephenG

Posted
Posted

I'm not trying to make new enemies but It's a good game but lucasarts could have done alot more. as gamespot said and i have to agree:

 

"...Would it have killed LucasArts to make the sides substantially different? In Age of Kings, the Britons don't vary too drastically from the Celts because, well, they're both human civilizations that evolved along similar lines. But the only real excuse for the Gungans and the Galactic Empire being so similar is that this is the way Age of Kings did it."

 

. it's is basically AoE with different graphics.

Guest Supreme Warlord

Guest Supreme Warlord

Posted
Posted

It is better than the Ages of Empire because THe SWGB is an advance civs technolgy. In the AoE it is boring to command primtive armies... SWGB is much much better!!! I AGREE WITH THE THREAD ARTHUR!!!!!!!!!!!!:)

StephenG Newbie

StephenG

Posted
Posted
Originally posted by Agen_Terminator

Not to make enemies or osmething but i think jk1 was better even thoguh it's old..... sorry... maybe i'm jsut biased but i enjoyed jk a bit more (don't eat me please) :(

Anyway they're making Jedi Knight 2 so i'll be happy! :D

http://www.jediknightii.net

 

hello Terminator nice to see you on-the other side. see you back at JK2.net forums.

sensai Newbie

sensai

Posted
Posted

I agree that this is a truly awesome game, but I also agree that they should have more clearly defined each civilizations role, and maybe balanced it a little bit better. If they're going to do any of that, it would have to be in an expansion. If they create an expansion, I'd just hope that they make the civilizations a little more unique, and add some cool new features. Great game though! :D

Guest Supreme Warlord

Guest Supreme Warlord

Posted
Posted

DUDE the Civs art are different from each other and they are unique man. Look at the buildings!!! shoot dude how many games have you played? zero? :D hey man it is okay you are entitled to your own opnion. I think you are just a tad bit crazy to say that hehehe;)

StephenG Newbie

StephenG

Posted
Posted

what about the bulidings? every civ as the same building, it just looks different. I'm not saying it's a bad game it really fun but lucasarts could have done alittle more, it more like AoK TC with flying ships.

Agen Newbie

Agen

Posted
Posted
hello Terminator nice to see you on-the other side. see you back at JK2.net forums.

Yeh i decided to do some exploring on lucas forums.... see u back on jk2.net

I think LA could have done more but it's still a fun game ;)

Guest Supreme Warlord

Guest Supreme Warlord

Posted
Posted

StephenG you are entitled to your own opnion but I can say this THIS GAME ROCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!The building artwork is excellent and the only work they need to do is remove the darned Naboo and put in the VONG!!! GO VONG GO!!!:D

Zendjir Newbie

Zendjir

Posted
Posted

Yes, the game rulez :)

 

But then again, so did AoK

 

It's a great game, just dont give lucasarts the credits, they edited AoK.

But the buildings of GB are better than those of AoK...well done lucasarts!

Paragon_Leon Newbie

Paragon_Leon

Posted
Posted

I'm having immense fun with the game. The scope of strategy is higher than AOK with air-units and power-cores and shields, and..and...

you get the picture.

 

It's about gameplay, folks; not about how the civs look.

duder Newbie

duder

Posted
Posted
Originally posted by Paragon_Leon

I'm having immense fun with the game. The scope of strategy is higher than AOK with air-units and power-cores and shields, and..and...

you get the picture.

 

It's about gameplay, folks; not about how the civs look.

 

evidently not to everyone

:o

Guest Supreme Warlord

Guest Supreme Warlord

Posted
Posted

I AGREE LEON!! YOU GO MAN! I do like the art of other civs but I like to shoot it;) . I love to build a bunch of AT AT:atat: :atat: :atat: :atat: :atat: THey rule the world.

Chessack Newbie

Chessack

Posted
Posted
Originally posted by Paragon_Leon

I'm having immense fun with the game. The scope of strategy is higher than AOK with air-units and power-cores and shields, and..and...

you get the picture.

 

It's about gameplay, folks; not about how the civs look.

 

I completely agree. I love the AoE/AoK engine -- that is, how the game plays, how it works -- but I had gotten rather bored with the range of options available in it, after playing it for over a year. GB uses the same engine, and many similar (though re-named) options, but it also added a whole series of new things, such as those you mention. I've only been playing the more hardware-intensive games since this past August, when I finally got a nice new AMD Thunderbird-based PC... of the new games I've bought since then, GB is far and away my favorite. It uses my favorite engine, and tweaks it, and the tweak is *Star Wars* based! How can you get any better than that?

:)

 

May the Force be with you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...