Jump to content

Home

Major Gameplay Flaw


Eternity

Recommended Posts

S'up guys, hate to break this happy bubble that is surrounding us right now due to the fancy trailers and pics and whatnot, but I thought this deserved some attention.

 

I'm talking about sabre dueling. I was worrying about this long before the review complained about it; and now that they gave it voice, I'm worried. According to one person, they said that 'most duels can be won by getting behind the enemy and sabre throwing them.' This would really decrease the skills necessary to win in multi-player.

 

Thoughts? Feedback? Spitting at my feet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I just mentioned this in the thread about the review.

 

I agree, it is very worrying.

 

It is all very well for you people to say that it is untrue and you should just turn around. But this guy has PLAYED through the game, and says that it is a tactic that works against all opponets you meet in the game, including the bosses.

 

Never minding multi-player fir a moment, such a flaw would ruin the singleplayer game, as far as duelling is concerned.

 

And then one would assume that, if the AI sabreists are programmed with any competence at all, then this would also reflect a highly effective tactic in multi-player as well, and one that requires virtually no skill.

 

I don't think the reveiw made it out as an unbeatable tactic, just one that is far more effective than actually closing and fighting, which would be a damn shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe he only played on easy?!?

 

 

i mean come on think about it...

 

 

WHO here, is gonna let an enemy you're dueling, first of all, get behind you, and second, give him enough time, to aim, and throw his saber at you...

 

i wonder what his enemy was doing all that time... reading the PC Gamer!?!??!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it hard to believe with (at least) two dedicated AI programmers on board that they wouldn't have programmed the AI to turn around when you jump over their heads. It doesn't make much sense to me.

 

The AI will be better than JK at least. Even on hard the saber fights were **** easy in SP. And it didn't hurt the game's popularity.

 

[Edit - Stormy - swearing :tsk: ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This can also be intentional, you know? Your back is one of those places in your body which can be injured so many ways and can't be easily protected, so one strike or throw in there must be leathal; or do you think you are going to survive after your spine is broken? Either the guy playing the game simply had an opportunity to get behind enemies and throw his saber, before they could turn around OR there is "Major Gameplay Flaw" involved. It can also depend on who he was fighting againts: little crooks and Stormies might not have fast reflexes, while Reborns and Dark Jedis cover themselves much more carefully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the point here is that it renders Force powers and other tactics useless. Who cares about multi-player for the moment; if you could just run like hell behind the enemy and stick a saber in his back in single player mode, it kinda sucks.

 

You could blather on about not going behind the enemy to make it fun, but honestly, who are you kidding?

 

My main concern that force powers are pretty, but don't need to be used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems like a thread the devs would probably like to straighten out , but the lack of response from the devs makes me think it's possible that this is indeed true.

 

However, the game still hasn't been released yet, and the reviews must have only been previewing the beta version. And that's one of the main points of beta, isn't it? To find and destroy bugs and imbalances? If this is actually a game flaw, I believe it will be fixed before the game comes out. Or we can just play multiplayer with "No Force LS Throw allowed!", but the SP will still be ruined.

 

I'm going to give JO a fair chance, by waiting and seeing for myself.

 

But if there is an imbalance, please fix it devs! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"And I'm inclined to agree with Rave...that PCGamer score is meaningless if they did not actually have the final build of the game."

 

And I am also, that is why PC Gamer US will not review a game unless it is a retail version, that is why this game will probably be rated higher than 93% in the US version.

 

 

my2sentz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...