Boba Rhett Posted May 10, 2002 Share Posted May 10, 2002 Local ABC station WLS showed some highlights from this weeks "Ebert and Roeper" on the news earlier today. While it seems as if Roeper really enjoyed the film, Ebert did not. Which is shocking, considering that Ebert gave Phantom Menace one of its best reviews. The highlights seemed to insinuate that Ebert thought that the effects were too over the top and that the story had too many holes in it. Ebert and Roeper should have their full review this coming Sunday. ____________________________________________ I would have bet money. lots and lots of money, that it was going to be the other way around. http://www.theforce.net/episode2/index.html#16263 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wraith 8 Posted May 10, 2002 Share Posted May 10, 2002 hey everybody has their own opinion... im not gonna listen to some folks saying the movie is bad ... untll i see it and think the same after that But i very much doubt it that i will say the movie sucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfnshannon Posted May 10, 2002 Share Posted May 10, 2002 these are the same people that praised such movies as... "Like water for chocolate" "The englishman who came down a mountain...blah blah" and "Dr T and the woman" well probably not Dr T but for those of you that saw that I kept thinking wat in the **** and then it got worse....you kept thinking you wanted to leave..but you stayed because you were thinking wat in the ****??? I always go by the opposite of wat ebert says don't you??? He's an old man who wouldn't know a good star wars movie if it shot him in the butt. I bet he liked jar jar too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.