Jump to content

Home

They Caught The Sniper!!!


The Seeker

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by obi-wan13

Being a muslim doesn't mean you're a terrorist.

 

Exactly. However, this man who is a converted Muslim, supposedly has a great deal of anti-American sentiment. Did he commit these crimes (if he indeed commited them at all) in the name of his political beliefs? Who knows. If the answer is "yes" then it would suffice to say that these murders were committed as acts of terrorism.

 

Terrorism doesn't necessarily have to be in the name of political agenda. More often than not, it occurs as a result of religious beliefs. Who knows what the actual motivation is here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by obi-wan13

At least one person form every single race has done at least one act of crime thinkable, so let's not go saying "White guys do this" and "black people do that" and "Korean people so this" and "Canadians do that."

 

I don't think he meant that there were specific Black, White or Korean crimes.

 

The fact is that most serial killers(which this one is) have been White males. Most not all. As a matter of fact in Florida last month a female serial killer was put to death(she was White.If you cared.)

 

None of the shots were fired from rooftops. All were done from the ground. Also, the guy was not a military sniper.

 

I live in DC so we get all the details. When those outsided the area get to watch their sitcoms and dramas our local news would break into the shows to tell us more details about information they didn't have.

 

I'm glad they caught this guy and I hope there are no stupid copy cats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This man is nothing more then a Serial Killer. Andy is right about how a sniper would pick off his targets. It is an m-16 for crying out loud, I don't think anyone would "snipe" with an m-16, scoped or not. From what I hear on the news, he was in a back of a car killing people? That is hardly what a sniper would do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Crybos

I don't think anyone would "snipe" with an m-16.....

 

Check the news from the last three weeks and you'll see that this individual did quite a bit of it with just that weapon. Once again, I think we're confusing the supposed conduct of a military-trained sniper (their proper weapon, target, range, methods, etc.) with what this person displayed.

 

This person was a sniper who also was a serial killer. There is no clear separation of titles in this case as they are one in the same in this specific instance. Here we have a serial killer who used the basic strategy of a sniper which was to eliminate targets from a distance based out of a concealed position. End of story.

 

What one finds as "inappropriate" conduct and methods of a "true" sniper are once again based upon opinion. The definition never states motive, distance or weapon. Otherwise, new revised word for 'sniper' would have to be generated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he's got to be gulity, John Lee Malvo, three names! they've always got three names!

 

what's the death penalty in washington? needle or gas? if you ask me they should do it like in the old days and tie him to two horses and make them run in opposite directions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...