Jump to content

Home

Join the Korean Freindship association


K_Kinnison

Recommended Posts

It's too late to stop North Korea from acquiring weapons of mass destruction. They claim to have nuclear weapons which I don't really mind. I don't mind nukes. So NK gets two of them and uses them. Oops now they're screwed. It's not like they have more where that came from.

Iraq has a ton of biochemical weapons. I dont' like biochemical weapons, so go after them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow, I just read something that made me think:

 

Said by Georges W. Bush:

Our friends South Korea and Japan...

 

Now "Friends" and "Japan" were two incompatible words about 38 years ago... Maybe in 40 years we will hear something like:

 

U.S. President:

Our friends Korea (North & South) and Iraq...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bush on North Korea : "We Must Invade Iraq"

 

Ooook...who the hell voted this guy in office and how and where did they obtain the substances to make such a decision?

 

Al Gore and Bush weren't ideal candidates but really people...lets pick the dumbest warmongering redneck out there. This guy has a problem with finishing things that he has started...when we were in Afghanistan and couldn't find Bin Laden, he was all hyped up on ousting Saddam...which btw we have no idea of what Iraq has as in terms of weapons...just all acusations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, it wouldn't bother me (as well as the part of the American public that's none too keen on our agressive military buildup in the middle-east) half as much if the administration would just come out and tell us the real reasons they want Saddam out.

Just level with us, OK Mr. Prez? Everybody knows what this is really about, it's time to drop the charade.

 

I just wish now that they would just go in and get it over with quickly,.. like ripping off a band-aid. I'm sick of watching special "Showdown With Saddam" news reports every time I turn on the TV. If we really have to get this guy out of power, just stop takling about it, shut-up and do it already!

How much is it costing us every day to transport and keep that many troops and equipment over there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by edlib

"Showdown With Saddam" news reports

 

I wonder who are the guys who think of all those titles and dramatic presentations, it looks like a movie/video game.

It's ridiculous.

 

*Dramatic song plays*

*Various shocking and revealing images appear*

*ATTACK OF THE CLONES IRAQ*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Assassin

Ooook...who the hell voted this guy in office and how and where did they obtain the substances to make such a decision?

 

Al Gore and Bush weren't ideal candidates but really people...lets pick the dumbest warmongering redneck out there. This guy has a problem with finishing things that he has started...when we were in Afghanistan and couldn't find Bin Laden, he was all hyped up on ousting Saddam...which btw we have no idea of what Iraq has as in terms of weapons...just all acusations.

 

Do you even think before you talk?

 

Firstly, most states voted for Bush. That is who voted for him.

 

Secondly, the US is the most powerful country in teh world and is friends with countries #2-# who knows. Also we're the good guys. Therefore, we get to decide who gets to invade what because no one can stop us.

 

Thirdly, Bush is not stupid. In fact, he is many orders of magnitude smarter than you. This is a fact. OH NOS THE BUSH GOT THE 'C" IN SOME CLASS AT HARVARD. That was probably because no one wants to do anything in college. I hope that some day people don't say OH NOS NUTE GOT A D IN NETWORKING! HE CAN'T BE A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE. LET US IGNORE HIS HIGH GRADES IN LAW CLASSES. He is also not a redneck. Nor is he a warmonger. If he was, China would have gotten such a spanking over that Orion a while back.

 

Fourthly, Iraq predates the whole bin Laden thing. In fact, Bush said he was for the ousting of Saddam in early 2000. THREE YEARS AGO. Please do not ignore the past and the facts.

 

Finally, we have a LOT of information about what Iraq has. Perhaps you didn't read the dossier the British released several months ago outlining just how the Iraqis have violated numerous treaties? I did.

 

Here: http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iraq/iraqdossier.pdf

and here:

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/iraq_wmd/Iraq_Oct_2002.htm

 

Saddam is a monster and deserves horrible death. I have no web sources to prove this. But he is one, with the torturing and the random executions of his own men.

 

Last week, it became know that Iraq illegally possessed rocket motors and chemical warheads. This alone is a violation of the treaty and the punishment for this is war.

 

I seriously believe that once this war goes down, we will find out the true reason for the delay and the backroom dealing: france and russia illegally sold arms and technology to iraq. You'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone explain why so many people think that Baghdad will be "OMG OMG ANOTHER STALINGRAD!"? The Taliban/AQ were religious fanatics, believing in no glory greater than death, yet they surrendered Kabul, Kandahar, and I think Mussar-e-Sharrif(sp) without a shot. If people are willing to risk the wrath of an all-seeing vengeful superbeing to surrender, who would fight for a secular tyrant who's either dead or in hiding?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Taarkin

who would fight for a secular tyrant who's either dead or in hiding?

 

The current plan is probably no one. I mean, this is a military that rapidly gave up in the face of anything last time (remember the guys surrendering to TV news crews because they weren't sure what kind of weapon a video camera was?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...