pbguy1211 Posted March 15, 2003 Posted March 15, 2003 i only remember 2 being shot down. one in which you didnt see the attacker, and the second was the one shot down after it dropped anakin and obi wan off at dooku's hanger. that was shot down by two aircraft type thing-a-ma-bobs
SE_Vader_536 Posted March 15, 2003 Author Posted March 15, 2003 must i say it again!? What about laser turrents shooting air?! Since when have you seen an anti air turrent (the kind in swgb) in star wars?
Echuu Shen-Jon Posted March 15, 2003 Posted March 15, 2003 A stationary AA-weapon?! Maybe it would be a good idea!
lukeiamyourdad Posted March 16, 2003 Posted March 16, 2003 Vader- GAMEPLAY>REALISM Echuu- What are you talking about???
pbguy1211 Posted March 17, 2003 Posted March 17, 2003 Quote Originally posted by {MGS}Echuu A stationary AA-weapon?! Maybe it would be a good idea! wouldnt that be called a TURRET!
pbguy1211 Posted March 17, 2003 Posted March 17, 2003 Quote Originally posted by {MGS}Echuu A stationary AA-weapon?! Maybe it would be a good idea! besides, you can make an AA mobile and have it not move.... that's stationary
Echuu Shen-Jon Posted March 17, 2003 Posted March 17, 2003 Quote Originally posted by pbguy1211 besides, you can make an AA mobile and have it not move.... that's stationary Yes, that would properly be a good idea, but we already have a mobile AA-unit! What about a vehicle?
pbguy1211 Posted March 17, 2003 Posted March 17, 2003 Quote Originally posted by {MGS}Echuu Yes, that would properly be a good idea, but we already have a mobile AA-unit! What about a vehicle? What the hell are you talking about?!?!
Echuu Shen-Jon Posted March 17, 2003 Posted March 17, 2003 We have a mobile AA-unit. The AA-troopers! So what about an AA-vehicle?! Do you understand now? -pbguy1211. Yes, I meant a turret in my post Quote Originally posted by {MGS}Echuu A stationary AA-weapon?! Maybe it would be a good idea!
swphreak Posted March 17, 2003 Posted March 17, 2003 Hvy Weapns Factory -> AA Mech There's your vehicle. I'd like to see a 2 in 1 turrent that shoots everything. Since when did we see an Anti-Air weapon in Star Wars? They're all laser based weapons. They should be able to shoot both Air and Ground.
lukeiamyourdad Posted March 17, 2003 Posted March 17, 2003 Maybe...but it should be weaker if it can shoot both. Or like some other say... Gameplay>Realism
swphreak Posted March 17, 2003 Posted March 17, 2003 ahh.. Sith Master has plagued us with that darned saying How is it against Gameplay or for Realism? I've never seen missile turrents take out a Starfighter. Maybe if they added a "Special" laser turrent that can shoot both, then I'd be happy.
lukeiamyourdad Posted March 17, 2003 Posted March 17, 2003 Bah, if it's balanced I don't care. It could be useful. But then it comes back to the debate about ''all non mele units are anti air''....
SE_Vader_536 Posted March 17, 2003 Author Posted March 17, 2003 oh the hell with the realism<gameplay saying its annoying the hell out of me. How does a laser turrent that shoots air take from gameplay? It makes it a lot less annoying building less buildings and it makes you have be prepared to counter aa more effectively at tech 2 (if there'll still be tech levels in swgb2) oh and swphreak whyd you change your avatar. i liked the last one better...
pbguy1211 Posted March 17, 2003 Posted March 17, 2003 sigh... this is a strategy game. what's the strategy in having 1 unit to kill all others? there isn't much strategy in that. it's not a "ooh let's look at the pretty units" type of game... the game is to adapt to the opponents strategy or to make him adapt to yours. if you cant play it the way it is, don't play it. it seems like the only people complaining about it are the people who suck at it. if you dont like it, dont play it and shut up so we dont have to hear these useless and baseless arguements you make.
SE_Vader_536 Posted March 18, 2003 Author Posted March 18, 2003 I can live with aa and regualr units seperate but i find very annoying that some units that should be fighting back arent.
pbguy1211 Posted March 18, 2003 Posted March 18, 2003 just because YOU think it should doesnt mean it should...
lukeiamyourdad Posted March 18, 2003 Posted March 18, 2003 It comes back to gameplay>realism... and pbguy cut him some slack man he's just 12...
pbguy1211 Posted March 18, 2003 Posted March 18, 2003 Quote Originally posted by lukeiamyourdad It comes back to gameplay>realism... and pbguy cut him some slack man he's just 12... *smacks self in forehead* DOH! Didn't know that...
Admiral Vostok Posted March 19, 2003 Posted March 19, 2003 No, SE_Vader is 12. I think it is more strategic to have a range of things shoot air with differing effectiveness, rather than a dedicated unit that can do nothing but shoot air really well.
SE_Vader_536 Posted March 19, 2003 Author Posted March 19, 2003 What part of "don't treat me any differently cause im 12" did you not understand from the alien jedi poll!? oh and uh I agree with your NO WAR avatar swphreak. I mean really what's the point of destabilizing the region just because of one man?!
lukeiamyourdad Posted March 20, 2003 Posted March 20, 2003 Vader- Hum...don't ever make us remember that. And I still haven't got over our fight... Let's not start to talk about the whole Irak thing. I'm gonna start flaming some persons... Peace forever man...except in video games...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.