GendoTheGreat Posted March 20, 2003 Share Posted March 20, 2003 Have you ever heard such a festering load of bullshit in all your life? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metallus Posted March 20, 2003 Share Posted March 20, 2003 Not since they renamed "Operation Enduring Freedom" to "Operation Swift Freedom". Thanks for trying, guys. No, really. What the hell is "Swift Freedom", anyway? An orgasm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GendoTheGreat Posted March 20, 2003 Author Share Posted March 20, 2003 I think it should have been changed to; "Operation: Freedom for God's country America and all those who adhere to its values and\or rush to kiss its hallowed ass. The rest of you backward-thinking camel-fucking towel-headed devil-spawn can rot hell where you damn well belong, you heathens!" God bless America! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scabb Posted March 20, 2003 Share Posted March 20, 2003 I think BBC1 is stuck in some kind of incredibly irritating loop. "War on Iraq" "Attacked Military Leaders! Could be Saddam! Could end there says American Intelligence!" "George Bush is gonna take more of your money, he went on the Television!" "War on Iraq!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanspoof Posted March 20, 2003 Share Posted March 20, 2003 What the Hell? Who cares about all that crap? Just go kill everyone and win the bloody war! What's up with everyone??? Isn't it like being in a fight with someone you really hate and giving them pads and stuff? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GendoTheGreat Posted March 21, 2003 Author Share Posted March 21, 2003 Finally, I have something good to say about America! I've been reading reports that surrendering Iraqi military units are being allowed to keep their sidearms and go back to their bases. That's pretty damn sporting of the Yanks, I feel. A man feels that much more like a man with a piece at his side. For a soldier that's especially important. Of course, the desicion isn't fueled entirely by generosity and a sense of fair play - the Americans simply don't want to have to lug a hundred thousand prisoners around the desert that would have to be simultaneously protected and guarded. I guess when you hold all the aces, there isn't much honour in passing a few high cards around the table. But then, the Iraqis do get to remain armed and head home. I doubt a prisoner of war anywhere could lay claim to getting a better deal than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Eggplant Posted March 21, 2003 Share Posted March 21, 2003 i like war but they should be honest about it. U.S presidential speach: (as it should have been) my fellow americans, we had a terrorist attack perpetrated against us. it was tragic, we spent a lot of time cleaning up the ruins. americans sent money to the red cross to help the families of theose affected, the red cross bought computer equipment instead. we then went to afghanistan historically the break water of all wars. alexander the great could not conquer it, the russians had their own private vietnam there. so we went out and spent a lot of money kicking stones in the middle of nowhere nomadic goats smirked all the while. now we have put together a whole bunch of new weapons, we have to kick some ass so the world does not see that we are weak. so because my daddy had problems with him and it's a bit of a family issue plus we really need the oil bad and it will be great for our ecconomy we are going over their to liberate that poor oil for ourselves. and yes we did go into Kuwait during the gulf war and the people renamed a street for us but now popular sentiment is against us. it is in pakistan too and turkey for that matter. also in saudi arabia, hell all the arabs states dislike us, the people are all following religious leaders urging them to kill every israelite and american so the world will be a better place and the governments of these countries are powerless to stop populic opinion and public sentiments, so knowing we are not wanted there or in Korea, we will just hang around. now we gave saddm 12 years and days and days of we will attack soon we will attack soon boy oh boy this is just the skirmish we will begin kicking serious ass any day now, howerever if you guys could sort of initiate a middle eastern 'bay of pigs' sort of thing and oust your leader for us we would appreciate it. (and i mean we did not punish) saddam the first time for the catostophic enviromental terrorism he commited blowign those oil wells. hell the UN if it really had teeth should have banished Iraq to non world status forever for that one, and the US and all the allies should have gone in and liberated Iraq and brought Saddam to justice for that, but we only wanted to weaken the country just enough so that we could get some coin out of the oil. now unlike fiction; oil is not the spice melange yet the middle east is dune and the arab nations are the fremen. and if you ever read dune you would know that fremen even their women and children will fight to make sure not one single Harkohnen lives and even sadurkar against them is not a good idea. so we the west the G7 or 8 world should simply switch to solar, and all other alt power sources. tell the 3 car manufacturrers to start producing. set up wind turbines learnt how cold fusion works. and stop dealing with the middle east completely. after all they have one and only one viable export, and are in need of everything else from us. let them have their oil they can't eat it. and we should charge $100 dollars per orange, per needle, per bandage, per anything technological, or elsewise since it costs $100 dollars US per barrel of oil. and americans jumped the gun with the japanese in WW2 now we are all so PC that we should almost be doing it now, or rather all middle eastern people who feel that america is a bad place and americans are souless infedels in league with satan, well here's a parachute for when we fly you over and dump you back into the country you came from. since it is so ideologically pure. please don't let the door bite your ass on the way out. also all these middle eastern countries who say they are against terrorism yet they fund them, why does anyone americans included need anonymous bank accounts in switzerland or the caymans? all those funds should be taken. case and point. and all these terrorist and religious leaders coming to america to educate themselves and then return home so that they can fill illiterate peoples heads full of anti western propoganda. and all the while here at least in canada the canadian arab federations president has the following to say: 'if islamic terrorists can sneak into canada and get past your security good for them! it's your problem that your not vigilent enough.' 'and media and journalists should not use or introduce the term islamic terrorist into the common venacular. yes these people are middle eastern and yes they are islamic and yes they are terrorists and yes they say that alah has commanded that they kill every single israelite and american and that they will die and go to our islamic version of heaven and get 70 wives and 70 mistress' but that does not make them fundamentalist islamic terrorists. *anyways you'll have noticed it stopped being a speach, and became a rant; oh say when i began really* anyhwo americans as your president i just want to say this to you all: we are bombing them with cruise missiles (i would say they qualify as) weapons of mass destruction. and we have high tech satelities in space, and we have B52 bombers always up their spying, er rather collecting topographical information. <if Saddam had this technology it would be evil> but we have it so it okay. and we will send bombs into Iraq from way outside their borders and these missiles will fly under the radar, so they can not be detectected <and if Saddam, sent missiles such as these at us it would be evil> but because we do it is okay. and Iraqis will learn how humane our soldiers really are. <and Saddam is bad, real bad, an agent of evil, because he builds government and military instalations inside populated areas where civilians can get hurt> but we have ourselves the White House and The Pentagon inside a populated area, where civilians and tourists can get hurt; but that is okay, cause we are the good guys. and we deffend the world. after all we won WW2, don't let the fact that we sat out 2\3rds or more of it before getting involved. anyhow america this is why we go to war. don't let anyone tell you it is an illegal war, (as if such an oxymoron even exists) yes God Bless America! and the only good Saddam is a Dead Saddam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tall Guy Posted March 21, 2003 Share Posted March 21, 2003 I'm for the war. Not because I like to see innocent women and children killed but I want to see Iraq liberated and its leader overthrown. How the world can stand back and let Saddam continually beef up his supply of weapons of mass destruction and treat 'his' people how he does is beyond me... In my opinion peace protesters are very nieve people, you have to understand that the people of Iraq don't want to live under the rule of Saddam any londer, they hate his regime and long to be free. Sure, there are some who support him but many don't. This war is just, it is needed and the world will be a better place once it's finished and the people of Iraq liberated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scabb Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 You also have to understand the reasons why the American government have chosen to liberate Iraq rather than other nations that are suffering a great deal more. North Korea are also known to have "tha bomb" and hundreds of thousands are starving because Jong spends too much on purchasing guns and explosives. The Palestineans and the Israelites have suffered for long enough too. Blah Blah etc. I do see the benefits of this war, but I don't think this is the best way to go about it. The Iraqis who want to be liberated will leave the country anyway, and probably never return, and in order to "liberate" them, we will first have to kill them. America forced the sanctions upon Iraq, profited from them, enforced them, bombed Iraqi civilians regularly, and now, for some reason, they've just decided to "liberate" them without finding any weapons of mass destruction or "liberating" the more obvious targets first. It's pure coincidence that Iraq holds a certain natural resource that the US are running out of / losing control of. There is really only one reason the US will be bombing Iraq, the others are just bonuses. In the long run, this is just going to increase the number of terrorist attacks on the US. Protestors only want to get out of work, Protesting never really helps when it's just people waving signs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Eggplant Posted March 22, 2003 Share Posted March 22, 2003 *the following may sound oddball and kooky* I wonder about something personally, George W spoke on and on about Saddam's vast store of Biological and Chemical warfare capabilities; ANd just before the War beginns and everyone assumes Bush got the first licks in SARS suddenly is coming to the USA and the UK and I bet Australia next. I mean it is sudden, and scientists and doctors have never seen it's like before. (someone reported to knowing how to produce Anthrax and Small Pox, well SARS couldn't be that much more difficult and it is only hollywood but Osmosis Jones the virus villian Drax, he planned to invade Frank with something as innocuos as the common cold. so there are islamic factions in the far east now. so if I was going to mastermind a viral assault I would do the following (A) start it as far away from me as possible. Asia is pretty far. (B) I would infect non arabic people. © I would target a group of people who would have reason to visit the USA, the UK, Australia and Europe. *I do not seem to sound racist and if this is I appologize in advance* but people from Hong Kong or other parts of Asia are more likely to visit the rest of the world than the middle east. I mean most of here in North America will never visit the middle east especially if a war is on. so starting a disease in the far east and letting it sweep across to the west is a plan indeed. (D) lastly a antidote. Saddam might have an antidote which he is not going to share with non islamic people. or he may be wanting to go down in flames with all his people coming with him. *at any rate because I do not have a life I tend to think of stuff like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tall Guy Posted March 25, 2003 Share Posted March 25, 2003 http://www.studentsforwar.org/ pro-war propaganda take a look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.