Majin Boba Fett Posted August 12, 2004 Posted August 12, 2004 What exactly is the definition of rush? I always thought it was t1/t2 trooper/mountie raid. Some people say anytime after all players agree. Well, I just got done playing an RM. It was no rush, which i never do anyways. Anyways, 40 minutes (according to the clock) have passed and I've been in T4 for a while. I do a pummel drop. What else is new? The guy goes crazy saying I rushed. Him and his partner (it was 2 v 2) continue to play. When they lose to me and my ally they go insane. I was not aware that attacking at T4 was a rush. Anyhoot, what is the true definition of a "rush"?
lukeiamyourdad Posted August 12, 2004 Posted August 12, 2004 Early game attack. 40 min isn't early game. T4 isn't early game. The guy's an idiot. You did not rush him at all.
Nairb Notneb Posted August 12, 2004 Posted August 12, 2004 Sounds like sore losers to me. I agree w/your def. of a rush, unless I'm wrong too (it has happened once already today). I mean if a pansy is going to cry every time you drop a few units off at her doorstep then tell her to play the "Build a monument" scenario so she won't get her nails dirty then. Why play a game with a "no rush" rule? Why stop there, why not play a game with a no troops until I build my army first rule? Ask her that why don't ya? I hate whiners. Next time rush that whiner with a barrage of air cruisers up his ying yang and ask 'em how he likes them apples.
Admiral Vostok Posted August 12, 2004 Posted August 12, 2004 Congrats on the win, Nitro. But as Luke's Dad and Nairb have already said, a pummel drop in T4 is not a rush, no matter how you look at it. Even if it was a rush, what was the guy complaining about? "Hey u cant rush me u might win da game dat way!!!!!1!!!!11!!!one!"
Majin Boba Fett Posted August 12, 2004 Author Posted August 12, 2004 hahaha. Well, the main purpose of my ventures on zone today was revenge. My freinds finally beat me yesterday. It was a 1 v 3, yes, it took three of them to bring me down over the course of 40 minutes after the initial attack.
swphreak Posted August 12, 2004 Posted August 12, 2004 A rush is when pbugy wipes me out in less than 10 minutes A 1v3 eh? I actually did that. It was me vs some friends (that were worse than me) in #echonet. I stomped 2 of them, and was moving onto my third when the game crashed...
DK_Viceroy Posted August 15, 2004 Posted August 15, 2004 Nitro the only possible way that could even remotley even be conceviable seen as a rush was if it was on fast and the 40 minutes on the clock was 15-20 minutes in reality. and even then that's pushing it to a whole new level of extreme.
saberhagen Posted August 15, 2004 Posted August 15, 2004 If it's not in the first 20 minutes of game time, then you can't call it a rush. And if it's a T2 trooper rush, it wouldn't even be much of a rush if it took 20 minutes.
DK_Viceroy Posted August 15, 2004 Posted August 15, 2004 That's why i said possible way that could even remotley even be conceviable In very exagerated language strechting out the point as far as i could making it very long and almost annoyingly obviuosly streched to try and make an important point.
Majin Boba Fett Posted August 16, 2004 Author Posted August 16, 2004 I guess my pummels are just too deadly...
DK_Viceroy Posted August 16, 2004 Posted August 16, 2004 No just annoying to be on the receiving end of them since when you play as the emp you don't have the best heavy weapons but you do have good ones. now Confederacy of Wookie Pummels now they're deadly.
FroZticles Posted August 16, 2004 Posted August 16, 2004 I'd say before 15mins, 20 mins most would be t3.
saberhagen Posted August 16, 2004 Posted August 16, 2004 True, for 15 to 20 I meant T3 strike rush, obviously.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.