Obi_Kwiet Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 What's with the graphis in the screens? I thought this was supposed to be a new game. It looks like something from 5 years ago. The modles look like they have 100 pollies in them. What's up with this? That kind of graphis may ok for a conslole but not a PC.
Master William Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 what the heck are you talking about? some screenshots have crappy graphics but some are really good looking
Revlt Coranier Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 Environments and vehicles: Great Player models: Ok/pretty good Weapon models: Lame
nakedtoad Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 Sometimes the screens are worse than the actual gameplay. Those screens are pretty much of close ups...
SITH_ShadowCat Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 How can something with such high PC system requirements have such crappy graphics? Although the requirments aren't the biggest, I'm sure it'll be hard to play at max settings without having top of the line graphics hardware.
insanellama Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 yeah screens never look too much like the game itself i have the demo and i think the graphics are pretty nice, and the gameplay is pretty sweet
nakedtoad Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 Originally posted by insanellama yeah screens never look too much like the game itself i have the demo and i think the graphics are pretty nice, and the gameplay is pretty sweet Exactly, the socom 2 screens are prettycrappy too, but when your playin its great.
Revlt Coranier Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 And plus, in the middle of a crazy firefight, there won't be much time to look closely at player models and the like
Oidar Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 The graphics are fine. Nothing wrong with them infact. If your looking for eye candy then wait for Repbulic commando, this games main focus in on multiplayer you want to run around with a game character that has 50,000 polys, fine goto it and lag like a crazy mofo. I like the looks of most of the character models, some I feel could use a little tweaking thats nothing major though. when bf1942 came out it didn't look like anything great but it had a style of game play that had yet to be done in any other game. Thats what made it so huge, game play!!! not graphics. geezus I can't stand graphic kiddies that are like "OMG, that game looks like total crap, I won't play it cause the graphics suck" they only want games that have graphics so intense that if a nuke goes off on their screen they get a tan from it...like wtf most games like that are absolute crap and play like crap. give me less in the graphics department and more in the game play. CS has crap graphics but people still play it cause its a great freaking game. Its all about the game play, looks are 2nd to that.
JawaJoey Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 Screenshots often look worse than the actual gameplay, if only because of distortion from making them smaller. But more importantly, a lot of the screens that are out come from early development, not the final product. Which means that many of the screens look bad because at that point, the game wasn't polished.
Mountainforest Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 Don't you wory. Reread al previews and press event reports. I believe there isn't one that says this game has crapy graphics.
Mountainforest Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 Mountainforest to all moderators, I repeat, Mountainforest to all moderators, Close this thread untill the game is out, I repeat, Close this thread untill the game is out, lol, this thread is what's crap. You really can't judge the game's graphics better then people who actually played it.
ExplodingMonkey Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 Originally posted by Obi_Kwiet What's with the graphis in the screens? I thought this was supposed to be a new game. It looks like something from 5 years ago... Five years ago we were playing Quake, and Half Life soon after. If you think this looks as old as Quake then you need to go to the eye doctor. It's on par with the Battlefiled engines and they look about a year and a half out of date. It's like that because it was built for the consols the same time as the PC. The only thing I hate is the weapons in 1st person mode. But then again, the modders will change that...
Clone_Fighter Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 I play CS... The graphics ain't very good, but the gameplay rocks!!
BobaFett123456 Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 Originally posted by Obi_Kwiet What's with the graphis in the screens? I thought this was supposed to be a new game. It looks like something from 5 years ago. The modles look like they have 100 pollies in them. What's up with this? That kind of graphis may ok for a conslole but not a PC. Whats it matter!!!! I still will sometimes play Daggerfal or Might and Magic 6 and believe me not for the graphics,but because there fun!EDIT OMG five years ago was 1999 almost 2000.....I feel older now.
Obi_Kwiet Posted September 4, 2004 Author Posted September 4, 2004 I'd say the player modles look ~UT '99 quallity. They may look a little better in the game play, but you can tell what the char. modles look like. Low pollie. And if it's just game play were after I think I'll just go instal JK again. I suppose this is what you get when you dev. for PS2 and GC and then put the same game on the PC. Consolse just can't handle what PC can take. I suppose this is why all the truly great PC games have been PC only or upgraded a whole lot from console.
ExplodingMonkey Posted September 4, 2004 Posted September 4, 2004 Don't worry. People are gonna mod this. They're gonna create high poly/high res stuff in addtion to total conversions and full scale enhancements of the base game. All the wanted vechs will be added in time... All the character models will be upgraded to uber... Maps will be abound... Weapons will get super detailed treatments... and total conversions will ensue... ...all done by the modding community.
rut-wa jodar Posted September 5, 2004 Posted September 5, 2004 You only have to look at magazines like OP2M to see that screenshots "NEVER" do a game justice.
Droniac Posted September 5, 2004 Posted September 5, 2004 I thought the game looked pretty crappy as well. Until I saw a gameplay video at IGN (or some other online game site) with PC footage.... If the game looks anything like the footage, you won't have anything to complain about.
Schetter Posted September 5, 2004 Posted September 5, 2004 Most screenies you'll see out there are taken from the console versions or a very early build of the PC version. No need to get your panties in a bunch - given the minimum system specs for PC, there should be plenty of eye candy.
WICKET_STBF Posted September 5, 2004 Posted September 5, 2004 Dont trust the screen wait until the game come's out !!!
Clone_Fighter Posted September 5, 2004 Posted September 5, 2004 Originally posted by Schetter Most screenies you'll see out there are taken from the console versions or a very early build of the PC version. Console demo got better graphics than that Must be early version of console maybe.
Alegis Posted September 5, 2004 Posted September 5, 2004 Yeah.. console can take better graphics (yes yes even PS2), the cross platform is not an excuse its bad compared to most games nowadays, but it seems gameplay will make up for that
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.