micks75au Posted November 30, 2004 Posted November 30, 2004 Well, what would your sith name be? And Does it have a meaning
Darth Windu Posted November 30, 2004 Posted November 30, 2004 ...Darth Windu As for why, it sounded good at the time. As for a real Sith name, Darth Ragous doesnt sound too bad.
saberhagen Posted November 30, 2004 Posted November 30, 2004 As a former Spurs fan, I'd have to be Darth Crooks. I'll get me coat...
lukeiamyourdad Posted November 30, 2004 Posted November 30, 2004 I sense DMUK closing this thread... Eh I'll answer anyway. Darth Cross. Don't ask.
DK_Viceroy Posted November 30, 2004 Posted November 30, 2004 I doubt that since The guru isn't here Conversation is thin on the ground and since there's no imminent news of details about our new RTS this place is quieter than an exam hall.
swphreak Posted November 30, 2004 Posted November 30, 2004 Sithra... yeah.... I like it though, sounds cool. And yeah, if that BFME thread was locked, this is gonna get locked as well.
DK_Viceroy Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 Maybe but since this is just barely Star Wars related and I mean just barely there's a chance it might stay open.
DK_Viceroy Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 It wouldn't nessacerily have to be a Darth name after all Assajj Ventress a "Sith Chick" doesn't have a Darth incarnation.
saberhagen Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 Originally posted by DK_Viceroy It wouldn't nessacerily have to be a Darth name after all Assajj Ventress a "Sith Chick" doesn't have a Darth incarnation. Who??? Let's face it, every sith in the films is a Darth. Someone's got to keep the purist pedantry going while Vostok's away.
swphreak Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 In the OT, Palpatine isn't called Darth Palpatine, or even Darth Sidious. He was called Emperor [Palpatine]. So.... no.
DK_Viceroy Posted December 2, 2004 Posted December 2, 2004 Saber your not as frequent as Vostok was I need someone to give a good Mauling with the Rightoeus Truth that is the EU.
Nairb Notneb Posted December 9, 2004 Posted December 9, 2004 Originally posted by DK_Viceroy It wouldn't nessacerily have to be a Darth name after all Assajj Ventress a "Sith Chick" doesn't have a Darth incarnation. Oh Viceroy, mister Truist. You know better. This bald "Sith Chick" can't be labeled "Darth" because she is not a Sith. She claims to be Sith but if you remember correctly Dooku corrects her and tells her that she is not a Sith. Also, she cannot be a Sith because there are presently two Sith and their code prevents her then from being one. Therefore she is not a Sith and cannot be called "Darth" anything. She is simply a Dark Force user that is working for the Sith. But she is cool. I would be DARTH LOTS!
DK_Viceroy Posted December 9, 2004 Posted December 9, 2004 During the times when there were more than 2 sith they were all Called Darth InsertNameHere anyway and Assajj Ventress would have been viewed as a sith by the Jedi Council. However said that Dooku would follow that particular rule about there being only 2? he needed all the help he could get and if it meant bending a rule or two maybe saying there could only b2 2 male and female sith then he would have done it.
Nairb Notneb Posted December 9, 2004 Posted December 9, 2004 Oh come on now, I think you're stretching it a bit now to cover yourself. But this is off topic I think isn't it?
Darth Windu Posted December 9, 2004 Posted December 9, 2004 Oh good grief. From a film purist point of view, Assajj Ventress wouldn't exist anyway. Also, Yoda and Mace Windu made it quite clear when they said there are only ever two Sith, a Master and an Apprentice. Phreak - true, but then the 'Darth Whatever' name is only one name by which they go by. For example, Darth Sidious is Senator/Supreme Chancellor/Emporer Palpatine; Darth Tyrannus is Count Dooku; Darth Vader is Anbakin Skywalker. However, you can tell that is different from what Lucas originally created because in the final battle between Obi-Wan and Vader, Obi keeps calling him 'Darth' instead of 'Vader' - so Darth was like his first name.
FroZticles Posted December 9, 2004 Posted December 9, 2004 Yes only 2 Sith but there could be hidden Dark Jedi out there who class themselves as Sith before the only 2 rule was put together there were thousands of Sith but this led to power struggles leading to the only 2 law.
DK_Viceroy Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 yes Froz most Sith were like that there were a few exceptions. Notice how the emporer doesn't have a Darth incarnation in the OT. I wonder why he looks radically different as sidious when he looks fine as normal palpatine. I just like Assajj Ventress and her rehtoric it sounds so cool. She's an Icon of how the empire later succeeded in destroying the Jedi, or so they thought...
FroZticles Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 He looks terrible even as Palpatine he looks aged and very pale not evil Sith pale but pale non the less.
DK_Viceroy Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 There must be some Radical thing to happen for Palpatine to go from how some pictures have him to how he is as sidious How could he go from that http://www.starwars.com/databank/character/palpatine/img/movie3_sm.jpg to how he is in the trailer missing several teeth
Nairb Notneb Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 I think that Palpatine only goes by "Emperor Palpatine" in the OT by design. I believe that he is hiding his Dark Powers from the general public. I think that only his most closest advisers are aware that he is a Sith, or at best a user of the Force. One point is that in ANH Moff Tarkin says to Vader when DV tells him that he felt the presence of Kenobi in the Death Star that "Surely he (meaning Kenobi) is dead by now. You are the last of the ancient religion" or something like that. He meant that Vader was the last Jedi, which in a way he was (except Yoda, but nobody but Ben knew of Yoda). It was as if Tarkin had no idea that Palpatine was a Sith too like Vader was. Everyone knew Vader used the Force.
DK_Viceroy Posted December 10, 2004 Posted December 10, 2004 I think him using the Dark Side of the force would have been a Major boost for him being an Emporer that way there wouldn't be any mass important planatery uprisings while he was "alive"
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.