kipperthefrog Posted December 3, 2004 Share Posted December 3, 2004 The Story Personaly, police should have done this long ago. remember in Pinochio, they used a theme park to draw in kids to turn them into donkeys? Micheal Jacskon uses a theme park to draw in kids for his own unspeackable pleasures. They think they're above the law. Wynona Rider, OJ "Peewee herman" guy Michael too. You think Micheal is guilty? Discuss... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted December 3, 2004 Share Posted December 3, 2004 Originally posted by kipperthefrog "Peewee herman" guy all he did was masturbate in a freaking porno theatre. :x what else would you do in that place? eat popcorn and admire the story? Personally I dunno if he molested anyone or not. Personally, I really don't care. These parents they hear this crap on the news, yet they still let their kids go? wtf, you don't want em touched, don't let them go. The parents should be arrested for idiocy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spider AL Posted December 4, 2004 Share Posted December 4, 2004 Evidence would suggest that he is in fact, a freaky perv. And the only odd skin condition he suffers from begins with "blea", and ends with "ching". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapNColostomy Posted December 4, 2004 Share Posted December 4, 2004 Originally posted by InsaneSith all he did was masturbate in a freaking porno theatre. :x Actually, no. He was busted a while back swapping kiddie porn with that guy that played the principal from Feris Buelers Day Off. >.> <.< I'm serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kipperthefrog Posted December 4, 2004 Author Share Posted December 4, 2004 Originally posted by InsaneSith all he did was masturbate in a freaking porno theatre. :x what else would you do in that place? eat popcorn and admire the story? Lets consider this IS a public place. You can't do that in Public. Originally posted by InsaneSith Personally I dunno if he molested anyone or not. Personally, I really don't care. These parents they hear this crap on the news, yet they still let their kids go? wtf, you don't want em touched, don't let them go. The parents should be arrested for idiocy. I agree on that. Parents should know better than to let kids go with someone who's been nown to do this trash. Why would anyone WANT to be with a kid? I say it is either to be gross, or he has been with too many women and he gets tired of them and needs somthing different to.. you know.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_hill987 Posted December 4, 2004 Share Posted December 4, 2004 I agree, after all of the storys so far would any parent let their kid go to his ranch? no. not unless they thought they could say their child was molested and sue. I think jacko is very missunderstood, I think he just likes chilldren, I don't think he would mean to harm them in any way, but he definatly does have isues. If I had kids I wouldn't let him near them. I say wait and see what they find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kipperthefrog Posted December 4, 2004 Author Share Posted December 4, 2004 Originally posted by jon_hill987 I say wait and see what they find. What could they find? unless he made porno videos with kids, i doub they would find enough evidence to convict him. Take OJ for example, they had enough evidence to hang him and "not guilty" was the verdict. ...but that's just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leper Messiah Posted December 4, 2004 Share Posted December 4, 2004 why has it taken so long to search his house for evidence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kipperthefrog Posted December 4, 2004 Author Share Posted December 4, 2004 Originally posted by Leper Messiah why has it taken so long to search his house for evidence? Maybie he ia getting speacial treatment becuase he is upper class and a celebrity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurgan Posted December 13, 2004 Share Posted December 13, 2004 That last I heard in the sordid Paul Reubens (Pee Wee Herman) story was that they suspected he may have gotten some kiddie porn, like the Ferris Beuller's day off actor. But the trouble is that the guy's porn stash is SO HUGE that it would take them a long time to investigate everything to see if it was in fact in his possession. Anyway, I tend to avoid celebrity court cases. What's the point anyway? One on the one hand you can say a famous person will always be hurt by the publicity because they can't escape it. On the other hand since they are famous their fans may think they innocent no matter what. On still the other hand, they tend to have so much money that they can get off from these kinds of things compared to the average person. Then again, isn't MJJ basically broke? Like MC Hammer, he's squandered his fortunes and failed to bounce his career back, so he's in big trouble. Then again he has so many friends he can probably put up a good enough fight if he wants to. In any case, for now he still holds onto a lot of property, so that could explain why it's taking so long (other than any artificial delays using his celebrity status, etc). I feel sorry for the guy (he's obviously got some severe emotional and self-image issues), but if he's guilty, well, he needs to be punished, for the victim's sake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_hill987 Posted December 15, 2004 Share Posted December 15, 2004 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/music/4097417.stm just in case anyone is interested in the latest developments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kipperthefrog Posted December 15, 2004 Author Share Posted December 15, 2004 Sounds like another OJ trial to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted December 15, 2004 Share Posted December 15, 2004 Originally posted by kipperthefrog Maybie he ia getting speacial treatment becuase he is upper class and a celebrity. hardly, people have basically hung him up to dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kipperthefrog Posted January 5, 2005 Author Share Posted January 5, 2005 Originally posted by InsaneSith hardly, people have basically hung him up to dry. if it was anyone else he would be in prison already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 Originally posted by kipperthefrog if it was anyone else he would be in prison already. no. Infact, this one is going quicker than most you never hear about on the news, simply due to the fact that the person commiting the crime wasn't a celebrity. This is probably one of the fastest moving investigations of child molestation I've read about in a while. He owns the Neverland Ranch, that's a lot of place to search. What I think about him having kids there is that, well he missed pretty much his entire childhood, with all the singing and touring he was forced to do. People like that tend to build an inner child type of complex. What they usually do to get rid of it is try to relive their childhood, but as a child instead of however they lived it originally. In his case, he just wanted to play around at the carnival and all that with his friends, but instead he had to tour pretty much his entire childhood. I can't really blame the guy for wanting to fix it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kipperthefrog Posted January 6, 2005 Author Share Posted January 6, 2005 Originally posted by InsaneSith no. Infact, this one is going quicker than most you never hear about on the news, simply due to the fact that the person commiting the crime wasn't a celebrity. This is probably one of the fastest moving investigations of child molestation I've read about in a while. He owns the Neverland Ranch, that's a lot of place to search. years ago he was acused of molestion before and he didn't get sentance yet. he got away with it last time. anyone else would have got jailed the first time. What I think about him having kids there is that, well he missed pretty much his entire childhood, with all the singing and touring he was forced to do. People like that tend to build an inner child type of complex. What they usually do to get rid of it is try to relive their childhood, but as a child instead of however they lived it originally. In his case, he just wanted to play around at the carnival and all that with his friends, but instead he had to tour pretty much his entire childhood. so you are saying to recover his "lost childhood" he has to sleep with a child? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Originally posted by kipperthefrog years ago he was acused of molestion before and he didn't get sentance yet. he got away with it last time. anyone else would have got jailed the first time. The parents of the child that accused him asked for an out of court settlement. Of course he didn't get charged, charges were dropped when they recieved payment. Originally posted by kipperthefrog so you are saying to recover his "lost childhood" he has to sleep with a child? No. Don't be stupid. also you don't know if he's sleeping with children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_hill987 Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Originally posted by InsaneSith also you don't know if he's sleeping with children. Yes he is, he addmited as much in an interveiw, however that does not imply he had sex with the children or molested them in any way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Wrong, he said he would allow children to sleep in his bed, but not with him in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapNColostomy Posted January 7, 2005 Share Posted January 7, 2005 Originally posted by InsaneSith The parents of the child that accused him asked for an out of court settlement. Of course he didn't get charged, charges were dropped when they recieved payment. In ANY other case the state would've picked up the charges. Money makes the world go round, I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kipperthefrog Posted January 8, 2005 Author Share Posted January 8, 2005 Originally posted by InsaneSith The parents of the child that accused him asked for an out of court settlement. Of course he didn't get charged, charges were dropped when they recieved payment. THAT is called a BRIBE! The rich people do that to avoid puplic punishment. he still got away with it becuase he's rich. Originally posted by InsaneSith No. Don't be stupid. also you don't know if he's sleeping with children. YOU don't know if he is not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 Originally posted by kipperthefrog THAT is called a BRIBE! The rich people do that to avoid puplic punishment. he still got away with it becuase he's rich. THE PARENTS! asked for money. He didn't approach them, they asked. I would do the same even if innocent. Because going to court you'd lose millions in a case like that. Originally posted by kipperthefrog YOU don't know if he is not! True, but unlike a majority of people, and the police, I believe in innocent until proven guilty. Prove to me he's guilty, find evidence that tells he did it. I'll admit he's guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kipperthefrog Posted January 9, 2005 Author Share Posted January 9, 2005 Originally posted by InsaneSith THE PARENTS! asked for money. He didn't approach them, they asked. I would do the same even if innocent. Because going to court you'd lose millions in a case like that. they aproached him with the lawsuit. and then he offered the bribe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_hill987 Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 Originally posted by InsaneSith THE PARENTS! asked for money. He didn't approach them, they asked. I would do the same even if innocent. Because going to court you'd lose millions in a case like that. True, but unlike a majority of people, and the police, I believe in innocent until proven guilty. Prove to me he's guilty, find evidence that tells he did it. I'll admit he's guilty. Well said, the parents are just money grabbing, and i don't know what the law says in the US but here in the UK it is innocent until proven guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 Originally posted by kipperthefrog they aproached him with the lawsuit. and then he offered the bribe. wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.