Jump to content

Home

Rebel Assault II on Vista


Marius Fett

Recommended Posts

nope, been there done that ;) Too many differences from direct 3d downwards

 

Once I started dual booting(xp in my case), this and similar compatibility issues for older games vanished :)

 

So unless you are keen on dual on booting, pop it back in the cupbaord > its not that good a game, and the eye candy vids can be seen on youtube nowdays, without needing to play the game ;)

 

mtfbwya

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Microsoft doesn't want you looking back. You must look ahead to the future, a dark and ominous future filled with ruling by an iron fist.

 

aw, cmon sithy :p

 

Why maintain backwards compatability with legacy 3D rendering, video and sound standards. When Toyota is designing their 2009 Prius, are they worried about making it retro-compatible with parts from your grandmoms 82 corolla ??

 

answer >> no.

 

To make complex, modern games that can fully utilise the capabilities of modern hardware, anything <DX8 just cant hack it.

 

There is no compatability mode that will allow you to play RA2. (The compatibility modes built into XP/Vista have limitations of course, and aren't really aimed at gaming)

 

For those really wanting to play the old titles...Dual boot, or forget about it. The choice is yours :D

 

The same goes for pretty much all of the old LA titles. Heck, even KOTOR/2 craps itself in Vista. No one is to blame, the game was made when Vista and the DX10 SDK were still on the drawing board.

 

such is the mode and pattern of life :violin:

 

mtfbwya

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the DOSBox page for RAII, you see these words in the comments:

Use this configuration:

[sblaster]

sbtype=sb16

sbbase=220

irq=7

dma=1

hdma=5

mixer=true

oplmode=auto

oplrate=22050

 

Also you need to set up the sound using the setup program, DO NOT use auto detect or the game will crash, manually enter the irq, base and dma and select sound blaster 16 as your soundcard.

Maybe that's your problem or something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vista has DX10, and can have DX9 installed along it it... I dont get how running a DX7? game will work.

 

If someone does get it working > I want screenies and a detailed explanation why!!

 

@Ray. That is a great option for those that dont own xp install discs ;) Im quite happy with my dual boot setup. XP is only intermittently used, but when required, is extremely handy to have.

 

mtfbwya

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vista has DX10, and can have DX9 installed along it it... I dont get how running a DX7? game will work.
What often fails to work is not DirectX but the old executable under an actual windows, like it is the case above. The exe is calling Windows functions/API calls which are not there anymore/have changed, like when you try to run a XP program under 2000 etc.

 

If someone does get it working > I want screenies and a detailed explanation why!!
Because DOSBox simply satisfies the needs (APIs etc) of older games.

 

@Ray. That is a great option for those that dont own xp install discs ;) Im quite happy with my dual boot setup. XP is only intermittently used, but when required, is extremely handy to have.
I don't like the idea to boot back and forth and back and forth and back and forth to switch between different games, or applications. Being able to start it all off from *one* system makes me happy. ATARI/Amiga/PSX/N64/DS/Gameboy/XBOX/DOS/Windows/Linux/younameit-based software without a single reboot simply kicks moar butt. XD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATARI/Amiga/PSX/N64/DS/Gameboy

 

Being able to start it all off from *one* system makes me happy...

 

which can be achieved by sticking to XP :D

 

I also have a dislike for retro gaming on the PC. Unless youre running in poxy windowed mode, 320x240(or less) looks shyte across a 30" native 1600p monitor :p

 

I wonder what shady and feverish reverse engineering will be able to achieve when the DX10 only games come out.

 

mtfbwya

Link to comment
Share on other sites

XP is a far better OS yeah, and by choice it would have been what I had on my PC.

Unfortunately all we could find was XP.

 

I'm sure Microsoft will update and fix the system as time goes by...

 

We just need to be patient. :)

 

I dont think they'll bother, and they shouldnt need to. If people are big on legacy apps, they should stick to a legacy OS. Building a complete backwards compatibility into an OS will make it more top heavy than it needs to be.

 

XP will give you that bridge between the old and new, and Linux can fill in some gaps too for those on vista without access to an XP disc.

 

mtfbwya

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...