millinniummany3 Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 Going by the Sith Lord's storyline and the role the Jedi Masters played in the game I think their allignment is open to interpretation, but you guys might be able to help me out with this. The Exile went to fight against the Mandalorian Wars with Revan, and the Jedi's reasoning is because of her betrayal she was cast out. When you confront them on Dantoine it is revealed that they are fearful of a wound in the Force and in a bid to heal it they seek to cut the Exile off from the Force completely. Kriea would comment that the reason why they wanted this, and why the Exile deafened herself to the Force, was because she was afraid. I think it's also said they used you as bait to lure out the Sith. And then there's Atris. At the Exile's trial she tried unsuccessfully to have the Council kill her. She also had them gather and then wiped out. How long was she influenced by the Sith, and how much did she influence the other Jedi? Now given the opportunity to kill them you gain a lot of Dark Side points for it, but just how much in the right were they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadYorick Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 I think that Atris was just influenced by Kreia and became darth Traya. Atris was just misunderstood. The Jedi masters were just afraid of the Exile's force wound. They were all just misunderstood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctrl Alt Del Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 Atris was just misunderstood. Oh sure. She plotted to excommunicate both Kreia and the Exile from the Jedi Order, trained herself a small army of non-Force sensitives, and decorated he bedroom with Sith Holocrons. She was just misunderstood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Bryddia Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 Ctrl_Alt_Del puts it well in a nut shell. Atris was hurt considerably when an individual she admired (perhaps even considered her heroine) had broken, no defied, the council's wishes and gone off to a war Atris (bieng a historian) thought poorely of. After that it was pride leading to arrogance, she and her 'innocent studies' to gain 'tactical information on the enemy' led her further into darkness. Still beset wit hypocrasy, the former member of the Jedi Council only embraced her status as a Sith adept whe nconfronted by Darth Traya. I think she ought to be considered seperately from the others here. As for the other masters, I'd not consider them evil so much as differing in opinion on a certain point of Jeid philosophy. As an aquantence of mine says, 'there are some hilltops to die on'. it seems to me the Council decided to die on the incorrect hilltop based on what we know of the background of the Mandalorian Wars and the 'True Sith'. (In other words very little.) There is evidence Rohlan Dyre, (KotOR Volume 2 Flashpoint, KotOR 2 itself) not to mention Revan and Malak's post Malachor descisians, that suggest there was some reason why it was NOT a good idea for the Revanchists to take an active part in the war. Or it could be Vrook being a control freak who resented how so many rallied to Revan's banner. I'd class the Masters you encounter (Atris excluded) as being light side still, if a tad incorrect. For one thing, if one defines following the Jedi model as good in Star Wars, than I would think the Council goofed by cloistering themselves away even though they still tried to influence the course of galactic events through Talia and the Khoonda administrator. On the other hand, if one were the leader of an army without one's army alive to command or protect, such a wait and see strategy might not be a bad idea. It seems certain that, tactically speaking, using Exile with her lovely blue eyes to attract Sith would actually be a smart move; a red herring if you will. Again, not exactly Jedi like but prudent behavior in a situation where one is out-manned, out-gunned, and facing an unseen foe who can consume a planet full of Force-sensatives. The fact that you killing them in game is an act of revenge for kicking you out could, perhaps contribute to the dark side points no matter why the player wants to kill them. All will become clear if Lucasfilm gets their act together and makes more games/comics/novels/anything new I may have forgotten, from this time period. I think the KotOR comics will answer some questions, for one thing they told us Malak used to have hair. Beat that! -Bearer of the Krijinia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jvstice Posted March 15, 2008 Share Posted March 15, 2008 In K1 & K2, the Sith were ruled by agression, while the remnants of the Jedi council were ruled by their fears. I wouldn't say that the Jedi were evil, but they were not strictly a force for good either and did many evil acts as well as good ones. I tend to see them as the lesser evil. The Sith actively caused harm, admittedly in the cases of some of the Sith in order to destroy what they saw as a greater evil. Some of the Jedi did this, but on the whole they did try to do the whole "hypocratic oath" thing and first do no harm. Where the Jedi council's evil came from is of inaction in the face of evil. "If good men and women do nothing in the face of evil, then it flourishes." And I know they were concerned with the people relying too much on them, like in Palpatine's rise to power in the clone wars era, but there are ways they could have helped subtlly, rather than a choice between being on the front lines vs ban every jedi everywhere from giving any help whatsoever or excommunicate them if they do. Of course, I think that Windu, Yoda, and co were influenced by the earlier history of 4000 years, and that's why Palpatine was able to manipulate them into making revan's mistake. They saw Kavar and Co's mistake with the benefit of hindsight, agreed with exile, disciple, handmaiden etc that the masters were wrong, and went to the exact opposite extreme. Of course this is the way real people do when they schism off a church (or other institution) because they get offended at the way it handled something. They look to create a new one that the abuses they saw in the original group could never be repeated, and go so far in the other direction that it sows the seeds of their own destruction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Strike Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 Personally, I see that the Jedi Masters in K! and K2, were seen as more teachers, or mentors, than actually masters.In KOTOR, they knew who Revan was, and tried to conceal it from him, or her, until the character completed the training, and could handle being told that they are Revan. And they do train Revan to become a Jedi, again. This is why I see the Jedi Council as more of mentors, or teachers, than actual masters. In 2, though, they become more of masters, but Atris see a padawan, that she has had a hand in training become something that she could not become, or easily become. If you play as a male, she is also attracted to you, at least in the beginning. The others, are somewhat teachers, as the ones alive teach you saber moves. But not much else, at least at the beginning. They also fill in some holes, and also they help you regain your powers, as a Jedi. Personally, I don't think any of the Masters were good or evil, but rather just various shades of grey. I think most of them wanted to join Revan, and fight against the Madalorians, but due to the trappings of their teachings, and after what the Exile went through, I think they were frightened that it could happen to them, and into inaction. I think that they were going to be more like a cadre of trainers, rather than actually fighting, but some were going to get their hands dirty, so to speak. Or at least, this is the impression I get when I talk to the various masters, and the council room on Coruscant, when I play 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCarter426 Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 No, they weren't evil. They were just misguided--but then again, that's the first step towards evil, isn't it? They were also hypocritical. Take Zez-Kai Ell, for instance. Besides Atris, he spoke against the Exile the most during the trial, and yet even then he had decided to leave the Order, as the Exile did. He left because he thought the others had forgotten what it means to be a Jedi, and then what did he do? He hid on a moon full of people in need of a Jedi's help, and all he did was ignore them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKA-001 Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 If anyone in the situation is evil then it's Revan and the Exile. Never mind the masters, because they actually knew something about what was going on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Strike Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 JCarter, you are right. I don't think that he was evil, just misguided. Zez-Kai Ell could have done more, I think. And he probably did what he could. However, he didn't turn to the dark side, just left the order. The rest, though, aren't evil, nor are they exactly good. Except for two people Atris, though, does go to the dark side, at the end. She happens to follow the path that was laid down by Kreia, and possibly others. Kreia is also one who isn't good, or even neutral, but rather evil. When I first played the game, I had a feeling that she was a Sith, or at least going towards the dark side. Whenever other characters would go towards the light side, and she remained neutral, I knew something was wrong with her. Oh, and the above was only for TSL, not KOTOR. I'll have to replay KOTOR, sometime, and get the feel of the masters there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCarter426 Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 The Jedi in KOTOR didn't seem evil, and you didn't really get that "misguided" vibe, either. They were, however, complete liars. Oh, and about Atris. She was perhaps the most extreme example of how "misguided" can easily turn to "evil". Kreia too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctrl Alt Del Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 Oh, and about Atris. She was perhaps the most extreme example of how "misguided" can easily turn to "evil". Kreia too. Agreed. Though I would hardly classify Kreia as ever misguided. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKA-001 Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 Looking at it from an in-universe perspective, Kreia is something of an anti-hero. Her ultimate goal certainly was unquestionably an admirable one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCarter426 Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 ...yet she did evil things in order to carry it out--as I said, misguided. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKA-001 Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 Whether that's misguided is more of an opinion than anything else. Yeah, she did evil things, hence the "anti-hero" description. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCarter426 Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 Well, she did evil things in order to carry out a greater good. That's misguided in my book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cygnus Q'ol Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 Kreia's actions were purely selfish and spurred by jealousy. She coveted the Exile's strength and ability to recover, thrive and even grow stronger after being separated from the force. She was just in a bad mood. You'd think there was a pharmacy somewhere on Nar Shadda that sold Midol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCarter426 Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 And yet she didn't try to hurt the Exile, or take anything from her. Her goal was to make the Exile--someone who had done what she could not--even stronger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKA-001 Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 I thought she wanted to kill the force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCarter426 Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 Yes, but she couldn't do that. So she did the second best thing by making the Exile stronger, as the Exile had managed to kill the Force within herself. That's what Malachor was (supposed to be) about (before it was cut). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctrl Alt Del Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 Yes, but she couldn't do that. So she did the second best thing by making the Exile stronger, as the Exile had managed to kill the Force within herself. That's what Malachor was (supposed to be) about (before it was cut). I see it other way. As she couldn't kill the Force by herself, she fed the only one who managed to at least show that wasn't controlled by it (on her views) until he/she got stronger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCarter426 Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 That's what I said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totenkopf Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 Yeah, she was basically an evil b*****. She twisted the Exile for her own misguided selfish agenda spurred by her own rage and impotence. The Jedi masters on the other hand had become increasingly irrelevant in the wake of Revan's crusade. The were most likely just flawed. Good in the sense of wanting to not cause evil, but blind to the fact their their own intransigent dawdling condemned the galaxy to further misery. They had become merely reactive rather than proactive and assiduously clung to their rigid understanding of their own code. No doubt why Jolee wanted no part of the council/order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCarter426 Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 What she did made the Exile stronger, though. For all the evil she did, she did as much good. Well, if the Exile listened to her, anyway. DS Exile is another matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev7 Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 I think that the Jedi Masters were probably just trying to stop a threat that they saw in the force. My thinking is that if the rid the force (use?) from the Exile, there would be no threat of Kreia destroying or killing the force. And of course, we all know that that never happened. But that is just my interpretation... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCarter426 Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 Oh, they had no idea about Kreia. It was Nihilus they were concerned about, and they thought cutting the Exile off from the Force would end the threat. Or, in the DS version, they never knew about Nihilus, and thought the Exile actually was the threat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.