Jump to content

Home

Was 'Greedo shooting first' George Lucas' worst idea?


Sivy

Was 'Greedo shooting first' George Lucas' worst idea?  

23 members have voted

  1. 1. Was 'Greedo shooting first' George Lucas' worst idea?

    • Hell yeah!
      6
    • I can think of something worst
      17


Recommended Posts

Was 'Greedo shooting first' George Lucas' worst idea?

 

Ok so what are your thoughts? Can you think of something in Star Wars worst than chaging a scene that didn't need changing and making it look ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Darklighter

No, I can think of something worst...

 

 

...does anyone know who...Jar Jar Binks is???!!!:mad::D

 

 

 

 

Yes I would of argeed, but seeing Ep II, I realised that Jar-Jar had an important role

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think it looks better when greedo shoots first. Cuz Han moves his head cuz.....uhh....he's cool......and his son is a jedi. Anyways George knows he made a mistake putting Jar Jar in Ep 1 so he made the part very small for Ep 2. Sux for Ahmed Best!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greedo shooting first was a bad idea. It even looks bad on film. I dunno why George Lucas was trying to make Han Solo look like such an angel. He was a smuggler for petes sake with a price on his head, he is looking out only for himself. As the trilogy progresses Han Solo's character matures over time. It is better to meet Han Solo as the selfish smuggler who becomes a more mature person looking out for others throughout the trilogy. But no! GL had to change to make Han Solo fire the second shot so he will be a better role model :rolleyes:

 

I think the Ewoks were a worse idea however. If GL had used wookies instead it would have made ROTJ 35.565% better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree wholeheartedly with darth lando, the ewoks were a major mistake. but i think that the absoulte stupidest thing GL did was.............. (drumroll please)..................... EPISODE ONE!!!! (this is just my opinion please do not flame me for having a thought) ok not ALL the movie sucked, but most of it really blew. the saber scene at the end and a few choice moments inside a kiddy movie full of stupid animals and crappy actors (jar jar and anakin mostly). GL could have made such a cooler movie by just adding a bit more action and killing jar jar, and alas the most important getting a better casting director for Anakin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course he's dead either way, but now the story has changed. What if Luke had killed Vader and the Emperor? They'd both be dead either way, but the story would be changed.

 

It makes a big difference in the way you percieve Han Solo. Everyone who grew up with the original now gets to see Solo get pussified. Maybe it doesn't matter to you because you didn't grow up seeing the orginal? I could then understand how changing the story wouldn't matter to you, as you never knew the original story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In defense of Anakin in Ep I, he is only nine. As GL said, finding an actor of that age who could give an oscar-winning performance is impossible (apart from perhaps Haley Joel Osment).

In my opinion, Mark Hamill performance in ANH wasn't that great, but in no way did it diminish the quality of the film, and thats how I feel about Ep I

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i really dont get it. Jake Llyod, i think, did a great job as Arnold Swarzeneggar's son in Jingle All The Way. Yes that was him. And there he was only 7 or 8. I think one of the major reasons Jake sucked so bad was because GL cant direct worth ****!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...