Dragonlancer Posted September 22, 2002 Posted September 22, 2002 If you all recall, GL stated that aurra sing was going to have a larger roll in episode II. Think about it, it makes sense! Aurra Sing was supposed to be in episode II rather then Zam Wesell (spelling?). Did something perhaps happen to the actress? Or was she maybe unwilling to come back? My guess is that George Lucas just decided to bring in a new character.
Sivy Posted September 22, 2002 Posted September 22, 2002 He probably changed it as he wanted a shape-shifter, to add more depth to the chase. or Aurra Sing going to take little boba under her wing in ep III
Admiral Vostok Posted September 22, 2002 Posted September 22, 2002 Who cares? Aurra Sing was just a podrace spectator as far as I'm concerned (and please don't quote me any EU stuff).
AgentSmith Posted September 22, 2002 Posted September 22, 2002 I think they replaced Aurra Sing with Zam Wessell because Zam was set up to die in the scenario. And since Aurra Sing had such a huge fanbase already George Lucas may have decided to replace her with a new bounty hunter he could kill off without too many consequences towards the fans. Just an idea...
Darth Kaan Posted September 30, 2002 Posted September 30, 2002 Maybe we will see her in EP3, maybe not. She is such a unique character, I cant believe Lucas wont use her. Then again who knows...
Sarlacc Food Posted October 1, 2002 Posted October 1, 2002 my friend had a stupit feeling that she would married boba fett after ep. 6... shes to old for that aint she?!
Darth Kaan Posted October 18, 2002 Posted October 18, 2002 As best I can figure based on EU comic series she is in, she would be around 30 by EP 3. The only reference to her age I can find was when she was on nar shaadda as a pre teen.
Hannibal Posted October 18, 2002 Posted October 18, 2002 Originally posted by AgentSmith And since Aurra Sing had such a huge fanbase already George Lucas may have decided to replace her with a new bounty hunter he could kill off without too many consequences towards the fans. Hmmm. I could see why this would make you happy(me too.) Cause that would mean that Lucas will not kill off Aayla Secura. Because of her huge....*cough**cough*....fanbase.
ckcsaber Posted October 18, 2002 Posted October 18, 2002 Why would'nt Lucas kill her off? For her fanbase?? No way! Look at what he did to Boba!
ZBomber Posted October 19, 2002 Posted October 19, 2002 Originally posted by ckcsaber Why would'nt Lucas kill her off? For her fanbase?? No way! Look at what he did to Boba! grr! Boba NEVER died. Even if you don't want a quote from EU, it never shows hi mdying. he just falls into it. He has alot of armor and weapons. He could easliy get out.
Khier Posted October 19, 2002 Posted October 19, 2002 ya Z's right, and no i spose i won't spout any EU either if it gets on ur nerves
gorganfloss Posted October 19, 2002 Posted October 19, 2002 Im glad Aurra wasnt in ep2 because I think she sucks, whilst Zam kicks ass.
Hannibal Posted October 19, 2002 Posted October 19, 2002 Originally posted by ckcsaber Why would'nt Lucas kill her off? For her fanbase?? No way! Look at what he did to Boba! ckcsaber, I was talking to AgentSmith. If you read the Aayla Secura thread(which I started ) you'd know how much he loves Aayla. I think you misunderstood my message. I'm betting Smith didn't. Did ya smith?
ckcsaber Posted October 19, 2002 Posted October 19, 2002 All im saying is that GL is completly willing to knock off a charcater who's not important to the storyline.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.