XERXES Posted September 25, 2002 Posted September 25, 2002 to me it seems 70x70 is fairly small, 100x100 wouldnt be too bad dont ya think? who agrees? and tyrion, aparently you are a cheerleader at UCLA, you did not witness me kill the gay emperor of china.
Sivy Posted September 25, 2002 Posted September 25, 2002 yeah and have the 20kb limit increased to 250mb
Jedi Spy Posted September 25, 2002 Posted September 25, 2002 i really think that is kinda a waste of time limited resources = bigger range of avatars
Sam Posted September 25, 2002 Posted September 25, 2002 I went to this one forum and there avatars were huge but it was a small forum.
NerfYoda Posted September 25, 2002 Posted September 25, 2002 Bigger avatars means more for the server to send which means more strain to put this poor web server under. Besides too big gets less asthetically pleasing. Make do with 70 I say.
OnlyOneCanoli Posted September 26, 2002 Posted September 26, 2002 Right, like this server isn't already down half the time. Anyway, I'll move this to Feedback so one of the admins may see it. I doubt it'll happen though.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.