El Sitherino Posted March 11, 2003 Share Posted March 11, 2003 america has never been a democratic government! people stop saying it is! bush is no worse than some of the other airheads that have been elected. true he has publicly released his decleration of war but many presidents have declared small terroristical wars such as carter who sent navy soldiers into african nations to "keep peace" meaning to kill innocent civilians. My uncle was one of the navy men who had to go in and do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C'jais Posted March 11, 2003 Share Posted March 11, 2003 Originally posted by griff38 Bush will be remembered as a tyrant long after history forgets about Sadam. That's pretty interesting. I'm thinking that the only thing history will remember from this conflict, is how Bush infuriated the entire middle east by poking his nose too far. The motives of the war, while noble, are very near sighted. This is not about disarming Hussein - this is about giving plenty of good reasons for hating USA, furthering global terrorism, and destabilizing the arab region. Believe me, I want Hussein removed as much as the next guy, but I think war is not the preferable choice here. Especially not considering USA is pushing for war so viciously - are they fearing a terror attack from Hussein in March? To push for war as madly as they are is completely ridiculous - it's like they're trying to hit some tight time schedule (the 4 year presidential term, maybe?). And then we can all sit back and wonder why Bush didn't do anything to remove Mugabe, the Chinese domination over Tibet, solve the Israel-Palestine conflict or wrestle with Il Jong, who's the only dictator capable of hitting US soil. All this talk about Hussein being connected to terror groups and actively wanting to hurt USA is not relevant. Even if he was cooperating with terrorist factions, what do you think will happen once he is removed? Those factions will be even more decentralized, as they don't even have to worry about ruling a country. Those factions hate USA with an even greater passion. Those factions are going to hit Israel and Kuwait, and they are going to be supported by other arab nations fearing and loathing USA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griff38 Posted March 11, 2003 Share Posted March 11, 2003 Originally posted by InsaneSith america has never been a democratic government! people stop saying it is! Not sure if you know what your talking about. If from your denial you mean to imply we are a republic why not say it so people have a clue what your talking about? Technically we are a republic, but then again so is any political order that is not a monarchy. We are a democratic nation per the constitution. Generally speaking the U.S. is a republic. Specifically speaking the U.S. is a democracy. Up untill bush jr. was given the presidency, The UNITED STATES was a Democratic goverment!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted March 11, 2003 Share Posted March 11, 2003 once again it was never democratic. we always voted for representatives to make decisions on what to do about things. if it was a democracy every citizen could have a part it what becomes law and what doesnt. every citizen would have part in how the budget of america is divided. we dont have a say in it at all, the senators do. we have discussed this before. if anything america is a democratic republic inwhich we elect officials to "speak" for us.(even though they only speak for the rich) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTeddyPaul Posted March 11, 2003 Share Posted March 11, 2003 Originally posted by JM Qui-Gon Jinn They were rebelling, after all Prove it. Prove it. Prove it. And why were they rebelling? Because Saddam is evil! Torture ummm okay how about when our pilots were shot down and were TORTURED into confessing on Iraqi TV. If you also hear stories of refugees and other people who have lived they will give you some very vividd accounts and even more vivid pictures. We just found some weapons in Iraq the other day. Iraq says we planted the weapons there so I will ask you who do you believe? Prove he killed his family members okay THEY ARE DEAD and didn't die naturally because he was afraid they wanted power. Even his own physician was cut up and put in a box and sent to his wife (account from the wife). The reason was because he asked to be sent home when Saddam needed him so Saddam said he could go home. He just neglected the pieces he would be in and the box. The main countries (Russia, China, GB, etc) have said they woud vote to search longer for the weapons. BigTeddyPaul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breton Posted March 11, 2003 Share Posted March 11, 2003 Originally posted by BigTeddyPaul And why were they rebelling? Because Saddam is evil! No, it was because USA convinced them into doing it. And btw, evil people does not excist. Torture ummm okay how about when our pilots were shot down and were TORTURED into confessing on Iraqi TV. What were the pilots doing there anyway? Prove he killed his family members okay THEY ARE DEAD No they aren't. Dunno who's made you belive that, but he does have family (alive). . Even his own physician was cut up and put in a box and sent to his wife (account from the wife). I can say it like this: That is excactly what Bush& friends want you to belive. The main countries (Russia, China, GB, etc) have said they woud vote to search longer for the weapons. GB, Spain and Bulgaria are those who intends to vote with US. Russia, China, France, Germany, and one other are those who are going to vote no. So 6 countries have yet not decided, and US need totally 9 votes to manage to get it through. But they won't make it anyway, as both Russia and France have said they will use veto against it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTeddyPaul Posted March 11, 2003 Share Posted March 11, 2003 Do you not watch TV? Do you not read or hear the reports of refugees fleeing his country? Do you not hear the sworn testimony of some of his peeps (bodyguards, aids, officials)? The men were bombing. Fine. Shoot them down kill them that is fine. It is war. You do not however torture prisoners of war. That is a faux pas. You choose not to believe these thousands of reports from existing non-American sources then go ahead. I cannot convince you otherwise. Evil people do exist. People who go out and kill for no apparent good reason (self defense/self preservation), are evil. Evil is a state of mind but it is also an adjective. BigTeddyPaul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breton Posted March 11, 2003 Share Posted March 11, 2003 Originally posted by BigTeddyPaul Do you not watch TV? I do. And luckily, it's TV that's not taking sides. I'm afraid it seems you weren't that lucky. Do you not read or hear the reports of refugees fleeing his country? Far from all of them make such reports about how horrible Saddam is. And refugees can be made into saying anything. The men were bombing. Fine. Shoot them down kill them that is fine. It is war. Is it? If so, I may inform you that if US have started war already, they have broken about 100 UN rules. You choose not to believe these thousands of reports from existing non-American sources then go ahead. I cannot convince you otherwise. In such matters, I choose not to put too much trust into any of the two sides. I do not belive one side is good and one side is evil, since evil doesn't excist anyway. You may say that there's two grey sides instead of one black and one white. Evil people do exist. Evil is not in human nature, whatever religion have made you belive. Just think about it for a second. Take Osama bin Laden for instance. Why does he want to kill off Americans? Because he belives they are evil and the world is better off without them. Thus, he is beliving he is doing the right thing, meaning he isn't evil. People who go out and kill for no apparent good reason (self defense/self preservation), are evil. Saddam doesn't kill for no apparent good reason. Actually, the only ones who fit to your description of evil is people killing because they enjoy it. But this is always caused by a mental disease, so they are sick, not evil. Evil is a state of mind but it is also an adjective. Evil is nothing but a product of naive black-white vision on things. Evil does not excist, it's just an extremely simplified view belonging to those who does not manage to see things from another's point of view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C'jais Posted March 11, 2003 Share Posted March 11, 2003 Originally posted by BigTeddyPaul You do not however torture prisoners of war. That is a faux pas. Actually, have you heard the latest news about two afghan prisoners getting tortured to death during interrogations at camp delta? And just what exactly are you two arguing about here? We all know Saddam is a bad guy. He is a dictator. However, there's no need to believe all the hype about him ripping people's hearts out and eating family members for breakfast. While a mad person, he's not that mad. EDIT: Mi kan no spel gut tunait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTeddyPaul Posted March 11, 2003 Share Posted March 11, 2003 I didn't hear about those prsoners at all. I believe it could happen. I am not going to get into a philosophical dispute with you about evil. To me he is evil plain and simple. I never said he ate someone's heart. As I said earlier I belive the reports and have made up my mind. Unless Powell comes out and says they are all lies and Iwill probably continue to see it this way. We jsut have differing opionions on how EVIL (mwhaha) Saddam is. BigTeddyPaul I was just joking about the heart bit, y'know (: -C' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinWalker Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 Originally posted by InsaneSith once again it was never democratic. we always voted for representatives to make decisions on what to do about things. if it was a democracy every citizen could have a part it what becomes law and what doesnt. every citizen would have part in how the budget of america is divided. we dont have a say in it at all, the senators do. we have discussed this before. if anything america is a democratic republic inwhich we elect officials to "speak" for us.(even though they only speak for the rich) Every citizen old enough to vote does have a say in what does/doesn't become law, the national budget, etc. True, we often vote for representatives to make the decisions, but if not for that proceedure, our lives would center around governing our country instead of living our lives. We vote for those that think the most like us. In many cases, we vote directly for issues and propositions at the polls along with officials. Insane, you're a cool dude (and a homie), but don't think that you can say "America is not a democracy" and it'll be so. Being a Republic and a Democracy are not mutually exclusive. Oh... just being registered to vote makes a difference. It means that your demographic has to be considered. Care to guess how many 18 - 27 year olds are registered to vote versus 28 - 37 or 38 - 50 year old demographics? Which do you think candidates attempt to please when discussing their platforms? I give you a hint: think of the last candidate that enjoyed Britany Spears and pledged to lower the drinking age, fight for lower insurance rates for young drivers, and defend skateboarding as a potential olympic sport. SkinWalker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinWalker Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 My vote is....... [DrumRoll.mid]....... Dubya! Damn... don't tell anyone I voted for George W. Bush! They might not understand the context! Bush is, in my opinion is the more dangerous. He appears willing to go to extremes to obtain as much power as he can. He usually has a very condescending tone in his voice when addressing the public. In a recent speech, I distinctly heard him say "my government" along with several other phrases that indicated his "power" over the people. Bush is a tyrant. Bush has betrayed the trust of the American people. We trusted him to deal with the terrorism problem. Instead, he squandered the good will our country received from the world in the aftermath of 9/11 on his unilateral push for war with Iraq. Bin Laden goes free. Al Quada is functioning in regions such as Columbia, Indonisia, and Africa. The "axis of evil" statement sparked the nuclear reaction of N. Korea. The U.S. economy is tanking, jobless rate is up, and the Kyoto protocol goes by unnoticed and uncared for. Those who betray their countrymen are called traitors in other circumstances. Who's the more dangerous? If saddam had an armed nuclear weapon and launched it at anyone in range... he still wouldn't be the more dangerous. Saddam is an enemy we know and an enemy the world is watching. If he were to do the things he did in the past, the world would like nothing better than an excuse to flush it's toilet of his filth. That's what makes him safe. He knows this. Our danger lies within... lurking in the dark recesses of this building, plotting and planning to take away our freedoms. Compensating for his ego by exercising power over the masses. SkinWalker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc Solar Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 I just saw on the news that you Americans are SHOCKED and FURIOUS about the fact that the price of gas has gone SKY HIGH! Did you now that I had to pay 80 € (...85 $?) when I filled up my tank the other day! That's 1,25 € per litre! Now you Yankees are bitching about having to pay, what.. 0,30 € per litre?! (I'd use "gallons", but I have no idea how much that is. The ratio is still the same so who cares.) You pay 0,30 and I pay 1,25. That means you get more than FOUR gallons whereas I get ONE! Think about that for a moment. Think about that every time you feel like life sucks or is unfair in one way or another. Think about that when your gf dumps you after you got fired and noticed you have chlamydia. And to those who are wondering what the hell this post has to do with the topic: Let me ask you this; would you prefer if I started a new thread about it, huh?! Now if you excuse me I have to go and sell my DVD-player in order to get enough money to buy gas for my damn petrol wasting car so that I can get to work tomorrow and earn enough money for the gas it takes to get me back home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigTeddyPaul Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 I remember we always used to take the bus (double stacker or something like that), the subway (I believe it is called the tube or something), or walk when I lived in Wales. Used to walk 2.2 kilometers to the nearest arcade to play Golden Axe one a week and then walk back. I miss being 7 and living with a castle no less than a mile from my house. We were too poor to have a car but it didn't matter. School right around the corner, shops on almost every street, a tavern every 3rd house (JK about that one but where I lived there were a lot of pubs), and a mall just a bus stop away. BigTeddyPaul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.