Adavardes

Indeed.

I just want to say that last night, I was a little tired, and wasn't properly communicating exactly what I was attempting to do in the thread. I apologise if I put you off or made you feel as if I were dismissing your advice. I wasn't, I was merely opting to attempt to make my point, and now that I feel I have, I'm done.

Sorry if I mislead you, I really don't want there to be hard feelings here, because I respect you as a debator, and an individual. I hope you can accept my apology.

I'm fine, a little brain-blasted after so much time discussing philosophy.

How about you? Up to anything new or interesting?

ENDY!

Endorennabennafofenna!

How's it shakin'? First chapter of the new SoD is soon to be released, kinda stoked about that, eh?

So, I'm stepping out from the debate, my friend.

Thank you for a stimulating discussion, it's been too long since I've had the opportunity. ^_^

I had a lot of fun, mate. Thanks for the stimulating discussion.

For me, those brain-boilers are always fun to revisit and mull over.

I just want you to know that what I'm doing in that thread is merely just sharing a concept, however wrong it may be, to garner other opinions, and have some fun doing it. I don't think I'm wrong, you don't think you're wrong, but this is all in good fun for me. All I ask is you respect my ideas, and not bash them with indirect insults.

Oh, btw, if my concept is right (I'll repeat myself, it can be wrong as any other concept), then "logic" could be a construct non-existent to reality. Just saying.

You know, I only started expressing that particular philosophy in a half-serious, let's-not-be-too-condemning-of-philosophy way, but now I'm just having fun hearing different views on it, and how offended and angry someone can get at the concept of not being able to know whether they're right or wrong, regardless of whether that concept holds any water. XD

I hear tell that you want me trapped.

http://www.lucasforums.com/showthread.php?p=2573429#post2573429

I think I'm in love with you. *_*

I know.

Btw, I'm declaring "NOT NEWSWEEK." to be your new catch phrase. XP

http://www.lucasforums.com/showthread.php?p=2572432#post2572432

They actually thought I was being literal. -_-

I've had about all I can stand from Garfield. T_T

^_^

vvvvv

I have a short temper. XD

Still, I've learned my lesson, however shaken I may be in regards to my faith in the LF staff's objectivity or fairness of prosecution. There won't be a repeat offense.

Thanks for the concern. ^_^

I'm conducting myself with the same discression as I would anywhere else on this forum, Jae. I have no desire to cause problems, I'd just like some answers to some questions that weren't properly addressed in the Obama thread. If it's really an issue, I'll drop it now.

Yeah, Newsbusters. You've used that before, and I believe that it's been discredited several times over, as it's a BLOG that is so painfully conservatively biased that it's ridiculous. If you don't mind, I'd like to see a different source than that garbage. If what you say is true, then it shouldn't be too hard to find something else, should it?

I wouldn't think so.

"Oh, and I'd love to hear what you have to say about EnderWiggin calling you out on outright lying about what O'Reilly and Hannity have said on this issue earlier, as you seem to have pulled a Palin and shifted right around that."

I still want my answer.

Thanks for the consideration, by the way. It's... refreshing, to have someone recognise your feelings about something.