Swedishman Posted September 15, 2003 Share Posted September 15, 2003 Whatta? I dont get it..., why does MI2 end the way it does??`I mean....., is Guybrush and evereyone else just a little boys daydream or what? And if so...., why has it not been mentioned in any other of the MI games??? Please answere me....., I´m going CRAZY!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien426 Posted September 15, 2003 Share Posted September 15, 2003 Many would disagree with me, but trust me, I know for sure! He's not a kid, nor is LeChuck his brother. The last scene with Elaine explains it all: LeChuck put a voodoo spell on Guybrush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshi Posted September 15, 2003 Share Posted September 15, 2003 Originally posted by Alien426 Many would disagree with me, but trust me, I know for sure! I'd really like to see your proof to back up that claim. A recent interview with one of the leads on CMI says that the ending is meant to make it out that he was just a boy in a theme park with an overactive imagination, and the stuff with elaine and the lechuck eyes were just to leave it open for a sequel should on ever come about (which it did, but with different leads on the project which is why they didn't dwell on the mi2 ending). So basically, the original intention was to have guybrush just be a small child, but that was axed because of the whole CMI thing. Of course, dave grossman seems to think that the MI2 ending was a result of coffee beans being switch to decafe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien426 Posted September 15, 2003 Share Posted September 15, 2003 Originally posted by Neil Joshi I'd really like to see your proof to back up that claim. Maybe I should make it clearer: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshi Posted September 15, 2003 Share Posted September 15, 2003 Maybe you should... ...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrik Posted September 15, 2003 Share Posted September 15, 2003 Swedishman, read this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swedishman Posted September 21, 2003 Author Share Posted September 21, 2003 thank you, Thrik, for the article..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anomonous Guy Posted September 28, 2003 Share Posted September 28, 2003 Interesting article indeed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Posted September 30, 2003 Share Posted September 30, 2003 What a great read. I really hope that the whole thing was a child's imagination and not some voodoo bollocks. It's a deeply satisfying answer to the secret of monkey island, and a really neat idea in itself. If only Mr.Gilbert were around to comment... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remi Posted September 30, 2003 Share Posted September 30, 2003 I doubt Gilbert will ever have anything to say about that. But still, as stated in the article (under the "Breaking news" part) and in other posts on this forum, the article has been confirmed to be pretty much spot on by people like Tim Schafer, Dave Grossman, Larry Ahern and Bill Tiller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anomonous Guy Posted September 30, 2003 Share Posted September 30, 2003 dudeish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bushmeister Posted September 30, 2003 Share Posted September 30, 2003 Dudes, it was meant to end the series, and I suppose Ron just wanted something interesting at the end of it. It pisses me off when people label it as "crap" when they can't figure it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.