RicardoLuigi... Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 well...yesterday i was watching vh1 for some reason... anyway, i saw the show "the fabulous life...of the hilton sisters". it was pretty interesting if i do say so myself...they're estimated to make $30,000,000 a year on handbag sales and once their dad passes away, they're both supposed to inherit $150,000,000 each. i also found out that nikki once wore a ten million dollar necklace to an award show because she couldn't find any other jewelry. for those of you that don't know who the hilton sisters are...they're the heiresses to the hilton hotel empire...their great-grandfather found the hilton hotels. but now to my question...which sister do you like better: nikki (a.k.a. nicky, i guess) or paris? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remi Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 I can't say I lose any sleep thinking about this, but I hate Paris. So I'll vote for the other one, who I don't know who is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Jones Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 i think a am now supposed to say something like .. hhmmm.. both.. .. on the otherhand.. it maybe possible thats its like throwing a salami into a corridor.. errmm.. ..?? .. both. they still have heads to uuhhmmm.. talk to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernil Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 They sound hot. Eh? Yeah? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien426 Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 You betcha. $150,000,000. You could buy a lot of jelly donuts for that. They also look good, if that's what you meant. On a side note: I voted for the wrong gal. Paris is prettier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shivermetimbers Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 I hate both of them. Just because you are rich doens't mean you should be idolized. If you actually did something worthwhile to get yourself tehre, I can see a few television interviews or something. But all these new shows about how great life is for people who have too much money (and yes, I think there is such a thing as too much money, no, I'm not poor but I think it's bad to have too much) sicken me. Neither of the Hiltons do anything worthwhile, and never will because they have huge fortunes wauiting for them and their idle lifestyles. Please don't jump on my throat becasue of my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remi Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Paris does star in her own private "artful" films, that has gotta count for something. ;-* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shivermetimbers Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Thats even worse. And ehre she is on the cover of magazines aimed at 13 year old girls. Ugh. I am soooo disgusted. People ought to just live their lives without all this disgusting publicity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptdc Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 They're both female, alive and not related to me. They pass the ptdc test Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alia Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Hmm... They look alike. However, Paris is a cooler name, so I pick her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RicardoLuigi... Posted November 26, 2003 Author Share Posted November 26, 2003 i don't think they look alike at all. i mean, at first i did but then after seeing a couple of shows with them on it...i could tell the difference. and you'd think they're twins...but they're not! paris is 22, and nikki is 19. i personally like paris better, she seems to be the one that actually tries to do anything at all. and i can't wait until paris' new show comes on: "the simple life". in case you haven't heard of it yet, she basically lives on an arkansas farm for a month with a family. her friend is with her as well. anyway...i like paris more, i think she's better looking, plus you hear about her more often. but that's just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shivermetimbers Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 HATE HATE HATE I hate both of them. I am disgusted by most of popular culture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RicardoLuigi... Posted November 26, 2003 Author Share Posted November 26, 2003 why do you hate them? i understand that it's kind of unfair that some people get to sit on their asses all day long and make money doing next to nothing, however i also think it's unfair to hate them just because they were born (into wealth and fame). also- i noticed that in nearly every big mtv show or any award show, the camera always seems to snap to a three-second shot of the hilton sisters. maybe to keep people watching? "oh the hilton sisters are there. this must be a really great show. i'm gonna keep watching." now that is stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shivermetimbers Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Because they are worthless people. They have never done, and probably never will do anything of any truly good use to anyone directly. Just donating money to a charity doesn't cut it. They didn't do anything to get the money they donated. When they start being useful and productive members of society (NOT "society" as in a rich cult) then my opinion will probably change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alia Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 If I'm understanding this correctly, they're only famous because they're really rich, right? (Excuse the fact that I'm a little out of the pop culture swing...I had never heard of them before this thread.) And with all that money, they can have what they want...in this case it appears to be fame. Why do you care? Because they're not "useful?" And pop stars who do the same thing under a facade of being "musicians" are? You know the kind of pop stars I'm talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remi Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Bottom line is that you all should worship me, so I become famous. That's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alia Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Not until you're freakishly wealthy. Then we'll worship you. And then you'll be famous. Or something closely akin to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shivermetimbers Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 Originally posted by Alia If I'm understanding this correctly, they're only famous because they're really rich, right? (Excuse the fact that I'm a little out of the pop culture swing...I had never heard of them before this thread.) And with all that money, they can have what they want...in this case it appears to be fame. Why do you care? Because they're not "useful?" And pop stars who do the same thing under a facade of being "musicians" are? You know the kind of pop stars I'm talking about. It irritates me that they do nothing. At least pop stars pretend to sing and do stuff. Not that I think they are good. But in general i dislike people who never do anything to make any sort of difference to anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptdc Posted November 26, 2003 Share Posted November 26, 2003 I will worship the dog ;D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernil Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 Bottom line is that you all should worship me, so I become famous. That's all. Done and...done. If they are the grandkids of a hotel-founder, where'd they get their amazingly good looks? Hotel-makers aren't usually considered to have extremely good looks. It makes me wonder... Yet I voted for Paris. In the above picture, she seemed to actually be happy and enjoying the spot-light, when the sister just seemed like she expected to be so obsessed over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natty Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 Paris is fantastic. I love her. She's so trashy. I had to say one of her home movies was hysterical. She looked so bored as this guy screwed her seneless. While she was here in Australia a few weeks ago for the Melbourne Cup racing carnival she hooked up with one of the rejects from Aus Idol. They met at the premier of Matrix Revolutions and then for the rest of the Melbourne Cup Carnival he followed her around like some lovesick puppydog. Quite sad really. I wonder if him and Paris made any home movies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RicardoLuigi... Posted November 27, 2003 Author Share Posted November 27, 2003 yeah, paris is the one you'd see dancing on a table at a club...nikki would just sit around and do nothing. i would have to say that paris is more...active. in a few more ways than one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shivermetimbers Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 What a good image of fame for young'ns everywhere. A trashy, lazy rich girl who make amature "movies". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Jones Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 i would say most of the guys think "a nice girl to do" most of the girls think either "what a biatch" or same as the guys. i dont know any people saying "hey. i just argued with her about crossing the road when the lights are red. .. damn. she is right. only do it if you have a road crossing chicken at your side!!" prft. and if i wanted i could have my own movie about whatever in the net. everybody can. wait.. I have .. and most people have sex too. the one or the other way. so what should be special about that video? so what is special about her at all??? she is nice? it depends to the eye of the beyolder.. .. .. stars? tse. all about publicitynothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien426 Posted November 27, 2003 Share Posted November 27, 2003 Originally posted by Shivermetimbers Because they are worthless people. They have never done, and probably never will do anything of any truly good use to anyone directly. Just donating money to a charity doesn't cut it. They didn't do anything to get the money they donated. When they start being useful and productive members of society (NOT "society" as in a rich cult) then my opinion will probably change. I'm actually thankful that they don't (yet?) try to sing. I frankly don't get what it is you expect of them. Do they have to visit orphanages and hospitals? Donor some organs and all their blood? Live with lepers? Money for charity does fully count in my opinion. I don't get why they whould work for the money they donate either. Are they to take another persons employment away? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.