tFighterPilot Posted June 12, 2004 Share Posted June 12, 2004 If they added more polygons to the legs. They look rather squarish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountainforest Posted June 12, 2004 Share Posted June 12, 2004 Originally posted by tFighterPilot If they added more polygons to the legs. They look rather squarish They got a half year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormHammer Posted June 12, 2004 Share Posted June 12, 2004 Personally, I think they should have an option for higher poly models and textures for the PC version. I hope this is one game where they don't simply lump it all together as one development with the same 'options' across all platforms. It simply doesn't work using the lowest common denominator (the PS2) to set your standards and features. With most of the other games I play online, I can fiddle with quite a few options to get optimum performance, from texture resolution to model complexity, from dynamic lighting to decals. Low poly models may be a necessary evil on the PS2 to get a decent framerate...but they should include appropriate options for each platform. If they don't do this, it may fall to the mod community on the PC to try and make higher res models/textures and try to import them into the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prime Posted June 12, 2004 Share Posted June 12, 2004 Originally posted by StormHammer Personally, I think they should have an option for higher poly models and textures for the PC version. Indeed. Don't **** us over with a port from crap consoles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revlt Coranier Posted June 12, 2004 Share Posted June 12, 2004 I think all the characters and animals look horrible. They look like PS1 graphics. I hope the screenshots are for PS2, and the PC ones look much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yaebginn Posted June 13, 2004 Share Posted June 13, 2004 They look fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nevhision Posted June 13, 2004 Share Posted June 13, 2004 sure graphics look nice, but I just think they're overrated. I think of them as a bonus and put gampeplay first. I still play Quake 2 and homeworld, and I don't care about the graphics. Game devs should spend more time on AI or stability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tFighterPilot Posted June 13, 2004 Author Share Posted June 13, 2004 Originally posted by Nevhision sure graphics look nice, but I just think they're overrated. I think of them as a bonus and put gampeplay first. I still play Quake 2 and homeworld, and I don't care about the graphics. Game devs should spend more time on AI or stability. I don't care that much about the graphics either, but I still want more polygons in the legs god damnit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOdin Posted June 13, 2004 Share Posted June 13, 2004 Nevhision is right! What if you have the game with the best graphics ever, but a fun like going to the dentist? You will just play it 2 times or something and then kick it in your drawer.... I think all the games out there needs a lot more AI then better and better graphics. And the f***ing graphiccards are so expensive.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tFighterPilot Posted June 13, 2004 Author Share Posted June 13, 2004 Originally posted by SonOdin Nevhision is right! What if you have the game with the best graphics ever, but a fun like going to the dentist? You will just play it 2 times or something and then kick it in your drawer.... I think all the games out there needs a lot more AI then better and better graphics. And the f***ing graphiccards are so expensive.... That's why it should be cosumisable, unlike in the consoles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poggle Posted June 13, 2004 Share Posted June 13, 2004 Originally posted by StormHammer It simply doesn't work using the lowest common denominator (the PS2) to set your standards and features. couldn't agree more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabretooth Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 Good Graphics are a must, yet Gameplay comes first. I dunno about the graphics, they look okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nevhision Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 Gameplay is good but Gameplay comes through good concept people and design. As for hardware and the engine...AI takes all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountainforest Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 Yeah I agree. AI is nice, but since I am playing online most, AI isn't the big issue if you ask me. I think balance is the magic word. Graphics are at the end of the list, they are a nice extra. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabretooth Posted June 16, 2004 Share Posted June 16, 2004 Graphics? End of list? You want to play Battlefront as a 2D, 1980 video game? :eyeraise: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tFighterPilot Posted June 16, 2004 Author Share Posted June 16, 2004 Originally posted by sabretooth Graphics? End of list? You want to play Battlefront as a 2D, 1980 video game? :eyeraise: There were only like two colors back then... I would have trouble identifying the different kinds of clones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzzyfreaker Posted June 16, 2004 Share Posted June 16, 2004 Here you go! Lucasarts has looked into this post and changed their game so graphics are their last priority! First Screen! Although, i have to admit, gameplay does come a little bit ahead of graphics in my book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabretooth Posted June 16, 2004 Share Posted June 16, 2004 I'm with the black team! (They are the Imps, right?) Go my ping-pong bat!!! Hit 'em with the best lasers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountainforest Posted June 16, 2004 Share Posted June 16, 2004 No, I'd never like BF to be a 1980's 2D game, because nobody except me would buy the game. I could play the game agaisnt nobody, so there wouldn't be balance and gameplay (those are on the top of the list). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tFighterPilot Posted June 16, 2004 Author Share Posted June 16, 2004 Originally posted by jasperw No, I'd never like BF to be a 1980's 2D game, because nobody except me would buy the game. I could play the game agaisnt nobody, so there wouldn't be balance and gameplay (those are on the top of the list). I would get it because it has Star Wars in the title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountainforest Posted June 16, 2004 Share Posted June 16, 2004 That is somewhere on top of the list too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabretooth Posted June 17, 2004 Share Posted June 17, 2004 Star Wars Gaming Phreaks.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tFighterPilot Posted June 17, 2004 Author Share Posted June 17, 2004 Originally posted by sabretooth Star Wars Geeks.... fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.