Alegis Posted August 8, 2004 Posted August 8, 2004 indeed. In ET i was medic so i could heal myself and regenerate others (gave lots of medpcis if i didnt need em)..the downside was my lack of ammo for which i always needed a field ops. Give me more ammo there, and medic is the pwnage class
Virtuosis Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 Same here Alegis, I did the same thing in ET, medics were basically soldiers without the heavy weapons but with the ability to heal. I agree though, giving soldiers the ability to heal would throw off the balance of the game. Though I'm sure since it isn't even out yet, it wouldn't really matter.
reelguy227 Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 Originally posted by joesdomain I personally want to see background civilians added to the game so it looks more realistic. Sorta lame to have Tatoonie map with Mos Eisley and just have buildings only. i agree it would be stupid to be playing battles on a planet that your fighting for ,and its a barren planet and city ,there should be civs walking around.
DieStarWarsGeek Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 Their won't be a lot of civilians. Star Wars Galaxies was supposed to have bustling cities just like the movies, but every city is virtually deserted. Why? because they didn't want all this extra crap confusing players and slowing the game down. Pretty dumb IMO, yet another reason I left that game :/
joesdomain Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 Having a deserted planet that suppose to have a city like Mos Eisley, Theed City, Cloud City, Tipoca City, etc. would be boring! Just like not having background wildlife like Rancors, Wampas, etc. Civilivans are a must in the game. Star Wars Bounty Hunter had a good number of civilians in the game like in Courscant part. Can't see why they could not do it here.
Mountainforest Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 Maybe there will be cicilians in Mos Eisley in the form of a third faction doing nothing but run away. I know that Tuscans are the third faction if Tatooine, but Tatooine has two maps. If one map is Mos Eisley, there shouldn't be any tuskans there.
reelguy227 Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 Originally posted by jasperw Maybe there will be cicilians in Mos Eisley in the form of a third faction doing nothing but run away. I know that Tuscans are the third faction if Tatooine, but Tatooine has two maps. If one map is Mos Eisley, there shouldn't be any tuskans there. ya there should be people walking around ,and they should run away or if they get mad at you they could take a side and be neutral and start shooting people.
Super Clone Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 Yeah they should have civilians that take sides and stuff, like the tuskens...well...shoot everything in sight.Like :jawas.
reelguy227 Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 ya ,it should be like the imps are trying to put a planet or town in line and the rebs are defending the town from the imps and for the towns freedom ,like mos eisley.
Super Clone Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 Yeah, and then... EVERYTHING IS DESTOYED! HA HA HA HA HAA!
tFighterPilot Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 Originally posted by DieStarWarsGeek Their won't be a lot of civilians. Star Wars Galaxies was supposed to have bustling cities just like the movies, but every city is virtually deserted. Why? because they didn't want all this extra crap confusing players and slowing the game down. Pretty dumb IMO, yet another reason I left that game :/ There are many people in Mos Eisly's cantina. There were even the musicians from episode 4.
DieStarWarsGeek Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 Originally posted by tFighterPilot There are many people in Mos Eisly's cantina. There were even the musicians from episode 4. Yeah, but other than that? a bartender? The fact is the cantinas look nothing like the bubble of activity like the movies. The streets are deserted except for a few trainers here and there. THey did a horrible job making it feel like star wars. Horrible.
JDKnite188 Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 I think civilians would be a great feature in the game, but I don't expect Pandemic Studios to include them. That is just based on experience with other FPS games and applying the fact that BF is going to primarily an multiplayer game.
tFighterPilot Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 Originally posted by DieStarWarsGeek Yeah, but other than that? a bartender? The fact is the cantinas look nothing like the bubble of activity like the movies. The streets are deserted except for a few trainers here and there. THey did a horrible job making it feel like star wars. Horrible. Actually, there were many civilians there. The Mos Eisly cantina is the only thing I liked about SWG
Super Clone Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 There will hopefully have civilians and stuff.
reelguy227 Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 calm down mango ,calm down,its ok ,think puppies and candy canes,lol.
Super Clone Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 *breath heavily* *count to ten* Ok fine now, sorry about that.
Virtuosis Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 I don't think I've ever played a FPS with some type of civilian in the game, well black hawk down but not online. But do they really belong there, don't you think they would have fled if there was a fight going on right in front of them. Whether or not civilians are in the game won't really bother me. I just hope there is solid game play without lag.
reelguy227 Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 they should be in there ,it would add to the sw feeling ,the rebs and imps or clones and seps ,fighting over territories and the freedom of the galaxy.the civs would be the people they are fighting over ,like the inhabitants of mos eisley.
Virtuosis Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 Good point, it would add a little more to the game. If they do implement it hopefully they it won't cause lag. Lag can make a great game horrible!
reelguy227 Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 ya lag can make a great game horrible.what system yu gettin it on?
Virtuosis Posted August 10, 2004 Posted August 10, 2004 I'm going to be getting it on Playstation 2. lag in SOCOM II sucks, because you can be unloading on someone, but than they will appear behind you and get one shot and you die. It definetly can ruin any good game, and make an experience frustrating!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.