Astrotoy7 Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 OK. Ive decided to put this up here as a reference more than anything else, but will leave it open for discussion for the time being. So, please post any canon related queries and comments HERE The EU and canonical classification are intrinsically linked, and depending on who has produced that particular piece of EU and what it is about, it occupies a different part of the canon... Kurgan and Keralys are our resident canon experts, but I will list Kurgans famous canon liturgy here, which is taken from sources at starwars.com and wizards.com... * * * quoting Kurgan ....the canon policy, it's changed a bit over time. Here's the latest on it: http://forums.starwars.com/thread.j...t=15&msRange=15 Paraphrasing the comments of others on other forums (thanks Lord Poe): Lucasfilm's Leeland Chee, aka "Tasty Taste" runs an official database called the "Holocron" which details the various levels of Star Wars canon. Are the entries in the Holocron sorted as cannonical & non-cannonical? Are there various degress of officialness? The database does indeed have a canon field. Anything in the films and from George Lucas (including unpublished internal notes that we might receive from him or from the film production department) is considered "G" canon. Next we have what we call continuity "C" canon which is pretty much everything else. There is secondary "S" continuity canon which we use for some older published materials and things that may or may not fit just right. But, if it is referenced in something else it becomes "C". Similarly, any "C" canon item that makes it into the films can become "G" canon. Lastly there is non-continuity "N" which we rarely use except in the case of a blatant contradiction or for things that have been cut. I will not go into specifics as to what is considered "S" canon or what items that are seemingly "C" canon are actually "G" canon. Okay, I know that the novels are C-level, and I assume that most of the newer comics are also C-level. Where on the continuity spectrum to the Video games come in? "...continuity "C" canon which is pretty much everything else. " By everything else I mean EVERYthing else. Novels, comics, junior novels, videogames, trading card games, roleplaying games, toys, websites, television. As I've mentioned earlier, any contradictions that arise are dealt on a case-by-case. This has been our general approach to continuity since we began using the Holocron database to track it. In a nutshell, anything created by the author would be C-level. Anything in the the novels created by George Lucas (whether it comes from unpublished early script versions, unpublished author interviews with George, or George's revisions to the novelization manuscript) would be G-level unless contradicted by the films. It gets a little more complicated when something is seen on-screen but not named. So the "shuura fruit" mentioned in the AOTC novel would be G because you see it in the film, although the author came up with the name. Is there anything post-Return of the Jedi that is G level? Not in the database, no. If there is anything anywhere, only George knows. Though I don't discuss specific continuity issues in this thread, I do want to the address the fact that in the Holocron, we track continuity by Holocron entry and not by source. What that means is, a particular source would never be discounted in its entirety, only those elements of that source that are contradictory. Hence, while there may be individual elements of say the Marvel Comics or the Holiday Special that are considered non-continuity, all the other parts can still be valid. Interview: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?...w20031204leland Everything is looked at on a case-by-case basis. Among the factors we consider: In how many sources does this particular fact appear? Which source has the largest audience? Which explanation is the coolest? Have we been told by George Lucas to avoid this topic? If, after weighing all those variables, the answer isn't yet clear, the issue is presented to an internal group that makes the final determination as to which source is "correct." So there you have it... * * * mtfbwya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.