The Hidden One Posted March 19, 2005 Share Posted March 19, 2005 Yes defintley. That guy is crazy and should be locked up immediatley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jblue789 Posted March 19, 2005 Share Posted March 19, 2005 Most likely so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaV™ Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 Yes he should be guilty, it's totally obvious hes a molester. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedHawke Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 *Once again, RedHawke gets out a ten-foot pole!* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
messle01 Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 most definitley he's guilty Who would dangle his baby over a high up hotell balconey with a blanket over it's head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaV™ Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 Red Hawke i wouldnt even want to touch him with a ten foot pole it would have to be like a football feild long pole Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goukistar Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 I have not been following the trial, and as such am in no position to pass judgement on the man based on any hard evidence. However, the fact that so many have been so quick to damn him based largely on how "odd" he is - an oddness that has extended to self-mutilation and may well be steeped in serious mental health issues - is something I find somewhat disturbing and does not reflect well upon us as a society as a whole. That being said, if I was a billionaire paedophile, I'd sure as hell build an amusement park in my backyard. Pretty damning when you think abpout it, he's guilty as sin! That kiddie fiddler deserves the chair! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue15 Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 i would hate to be on that jury..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
messle01 Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 so would i i wont be surprised if they found him inosent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Saturnine Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 I'd say it's 50-50% chance. While M.J. is definately a suspicious person, I don't rule out the possibility that the kid is just an attention whore after big money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Smaug Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 Saturnine : there are more kids that claim that Micheal abused them.AND i think he is guilty but picture yourself this : Micheal was a succes he could sing he could do moonwalks he was rich so he could ahve sex with any women he wants so WHY the little kids??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keiko Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 Guilty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedHawke Posted March 23, 2005 Share Posted March 23, 2005 Originally posted by Darth_Krow Red Hawke i wouldnt even want to touch him with a ten foot pole it would have to be like a football feild long pole Actually I meant I wouldn't want to touch the subject of M. Jackson with a ten-foot pole. But I do agree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
messle01 Posted March 24, 2005 Share Posted March 24, 2005 and latley they found desturbing images on his home pc and some pics of babys and littie kids on a lap top now if that dosent prove that he is guilty I dont know what dose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.