generalvaklu321 Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 You're kidding, right? OK, let's compromise. They should get life in prison, but it must be spent among the general prison population. They should get no special treatment. Considering that this kind of thing happens to them on a regular basis; wouldn't it be more humane just to execute them? No I'm not kidding about the cost of chemicals. I should correct myself, it's not just the chemicals, it's the legal procedings, you have to go trough another phase after being found guily. So yeah, it is more expensive. But I do agree for no special treatment for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 And, after some reflection, I agree that a lifetime spent in prison among the general population is probably a more appropriate punishment for these people than execution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BongoBob Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 If they get put on death row, they get better conditions until they die, and there's people that have been on death row almost until they die of natural causes. **** that, put em in regular prison with the regular population. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTV2 Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Sick Bastard. He deserved it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
generalvaklu321 Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 And, after some reflection, I agree that a lifetime spent in prison among the general population is probably a more appropriate punishment for these people than . Yup, loads of beatings a day is probably worse than dying painlessly . Pedo's are on THE lowest social level in prisons, they are treated so inferior by everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davinq Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 ^ You know that from experience? Well this makes my day, to think that I deferred some fellow forumites from the violent thoughts of the dark side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoxStar Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 I in the US, we execute murderers. Wrong Each state has its position on the death penatly. Texas supports it, Illinois doesn't, I honestly don't know about other states off the top of my head. And equating child molesters with killers (I know this guy did both) doesn't make he or she a murderer, therefore, he or she would not be executed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BongoBob Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 Sorry Roxstar, but I equate child molesters with killers. It's one of the lowest and sickest things you can do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoxStar Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 Sorry Roxstar, but I equate child molesters with killers. It's one of the lowest and sickest things you can do. I do too, but there are those who have mental problems on top of that, so its not as if they all conciously think, "hmm... today, i'm going to rape a child". And they can be equated but the death penalty is reserved for actual killers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BongoBob Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 And they can be equated but the death penalty is reserved for actual killers. Quoted for truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTV2 Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 Give me a Gun and a list of Addresses. Problem Solved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TiE23 Posted October 4, 2006 Author Share Posted October 4, 2006 I don't think the Amish killer actually thought "Hmm, I should go execute some Amish school girls today." And if he lived he would get off scott free cause he was mentally unstable? **** that, give him the chair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoxStar Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 Wrong thread, TiE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
generalvaklu321 Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 Give me a Gun and a list of Addresses. Problem Solved. Going on a homocidal rampage against child molesters is worse than child molesting. I dont care if it's a joke, I still dont agree with the policy of "Eye for a Head" as most people here like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BongoBob Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 I don't think the Amish killer actually thought "Hmm, I should go execute some Amish school girls today." And if he lived he would get off scott free cause he was mentally unstable? **** that, give him the chair. Fail ;_; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TiE23 Posted October 4, 2006 Author Share Posted October 4, 2006 No, right thread, was directed @ Roxstar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTV2 Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Going on a homocidal rampage against child molesters is worse than child molesting. I dont care if it's a joke, I still dont agree with the policy of "Eye for a Head" as most people here like. I beleive its an "Eye For An Eye" but whats wrong with going Vigilante and getting all the child molesters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET Warrior Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Keep this thread civil, lest she be closed. This is a mighty serious topic of discussion, so I will close this the second I see any post I deem to be flaming or flame-baiting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue Nine Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 I beleive its an "Eye For An Eye" but whats wrong with going Vigilante and getting all the child molesters? Uh, it undermines the entire criminal justice system? And allows for too much arbitrariness? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toms Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 I for one like that we have agreed that the best arbitrators of justice are violent criminals. I can't think of anone i'd trust more to determine the guilt and appropriate punishment of someone than a guy who killed his wife. I say we get rid of all the judges and lawyers and just throw defendants in a ring with a load of viiolent psychopaths. Sorted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.