Jump to content

Home

Daniel's parting words...


Darnn

Recommended Posts

It seems he's banned. For hating homosexuals. I knew about this (as anyone who has read the 'about the author' section on his site did), and didn't like him the better for it, but so long as he kept his mouth shut, I wasn't going to say anything...

 

I hereby reproduce his email to me.

 

 

 

Thank you for your support Darnn. I know you're just a moderator of only the

one forum and can't have me unbanned, and if you can then please do so. Due

to my religion I was banned by thoes who beleive I did something to deserve

being banned, see http://www.lucasforums.com/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=132

for refrence.

 

I am sorry I've been forced to leave the forums, I know you'll not forget

me. Please tell everyone at the mojo board I wish the best for them in the

future, and that I'll never forget them. You could mention my email address

and that I have Messenger, my ICQ number 120383319 and tell them I'm still

floating around. One day I may return, but for now I will accept the unfair

punnishment I have been expecting. Tell them they have my support and that I

have theirs.

 

I wish you the best Darnn, you've always been a good member to the forums, I

know my mojo experience hasn't had me banned on this forum as was the old,

and I feel I was welcome there. Please tell me if I am welcome to return in

the future.

 

All the best Darnn,

-Daniel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, thats a bit extreme. I mean, I disagree with his viewpoint, but to ban him? that's just silly. By banning him, we are saying that we are narrow-minded too. We say that we are open-minded and accept everyone for who they are, but then go and ban someone for expressing their views?

hmmm..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It DOES appear as if the intolerance doorway swings BOTH ways, here.

 

I've read his posts. I find his thinking unfathomable, but he was only generally offensive. Some of his respondents were specifically offensive, attacking him "below the belt." It seemed to me that they deserved to be banned before him.

 

Or perhaps, there is more to the story...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

homophobia (for whatever reason, be it religion or morals) is considered unacceptable in the society we live in and therefore offensive. To keep those opinions to yourself is one thing, but to openly express them as being true on a public forum is quite another.

 

There were many reasons why mek was banned, that was just the last straw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't shut out someone just because they express opinions other than what's acceptable in society. Daniel is free to tell us we should all be christian or heterosexual or stick bananas in our ears or whatever, and we are free to ignore him. I mean, if he's harassing people or slandering people that's different, but I didn't see any of that in the thread. Of course, that's the only one I read, so I wouldn't really know what else he's done.

 

He's got a history of having really strange ideas, but that makes it all the more fun to argue with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by remio

I partly agree, but this is a private board, and the owners decide what's acceptable and what's not. Much like Dal Net says: "IRC is a service - not a right." - the same goes for these boards.

 

True. If he really wants to he can go make his own posting board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...