Jump to content

Home

It's true! Sniper Rifle = Disruptor


Scav

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Originally posted by waazzuupp

lol saberpro...you must be from the usa like me :) if you call someone mate over here...then you get labeled as a queer :)

 

I only lived in USA for about 5 years :) but still, mate sounds like:

classmate - Communist calling

jailmate - Whenever your in jail

or just mate - I aint your boyfriend/girlfriend

 

:lol: :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah, I use lots of voices. Announcer voices, <i>Australian</i> voices, baby voices.

 

Sometimes, I opt to talk like an Ozzie, and it drives people nuts. :)

 

No, you're not my boyfriend//girlfriend! How did you get that in your head?!

 

Wazzzupp, I don't know you, you should have kept your mouth shut. :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by waazzuupp

hey man..i'm just kiddn with you. why would i leave the forums of the coolest game of the year? i'de have to be crazy

 

[RECEIVE TRANSMISSION]

[FROM: TSG-SELS-SCAV:Computer-of-Language1]

[bEGIN PLAYBACK]

*bzzzt* Overload. Sarcasm comprehension//understanding matrix destabilizing; recommend immediate//prompt shutdown! OVERloa... *bzzt-static*

[END PLAYBACK]

[END TRANSMISSION]

 

Would you like to view this message again? Y/N _

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Scav

 

[RECEIVE TRANSMISSION]

[FROM: TSG-SELS-SCAV:Computer-of-Language1]

[bEGIN PLAYBACK]

*bzzzt* Overload. Sarcasm comprehension//understanding matrix destabilizing; recommend immediate//prompt shutdown! OVERloa... *bzzt-static*

[END PLAYBACK]

[END TRANSMISSION]

 

Would you like to view this message again? Y/N _

 

Y

[ENTER]

 

:D:p;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<font color=cbcbff> You austrailian folk do get a raw deal as far as games. Grand Theft Auto III's banning for example. I hope they don't ban Jedi Outcast over there because of the dismemberment. If they did, we'd all know that they had finally lost their <i>heads</i>.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Obi

<font color=cbcbff> You austrailian folk do get a raw deal as far as games. Grand Theft Auto III's banning for example. I hope they don't ban Jedi Outcast over there because of the dismemberment. If they did, we'd all know that they had finally lost their <i>heads</i>.

 

nah they have no reason to ban it....errr did they have a reason to ban GTA 3 ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<font color=cbcbff> Are you kidding? GTA III is the most wholesome incarnation of family gameplay this century! Quiet car rides, rifle practice(there are many garbage cans and targets to shoot in the game), classical music radio stations, making friends with the locals, quiet drives through parks etc..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Obi

<font color=cbcbff> Are you kidding? GTA III is the most wholesome incarnation of family gameplay this century! Quiet car rides, rifle practice(there are many garbage cans and targets to shoot in the game), classical music radio stations, making friends with the locals, quiet drives through parks etc..

 

[8-bit Theatre Fighter-esque]You can beat whores.[/8-bit Theatre Fighter-esque]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Obi

<font color=cbcbff> You austrailian folk do get a raw deal as far as games. Grand Theft Auto III's banning for example. I hope they don't ban Jedi Outcast over there because of the dismemberment. If they did, we'd all know that they had finally lost their <i>heads</i>.

 

Nah JKII won't get banned. From what I read, they group GTAIII as PORNOGRAPHY. So as long as JKII not having anything to do with being a criminal, or other innappropriate stuff, it won't be banned.

 

Although Singapore bans everything. Music == Banned. TV == Banned (more like government control). Gum == Banned. T-Shirt Untugged == Banned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Obi

<font color=cbcbff> Star Wars weapons are fictional things. If it was actually possible to explain how they worked, it would actually be possible to create such a weapon. Don't try to explain something that can't be explained.

 

Sorry to bring us back to the argument (not really), but here I go.

 

Point one: We don't know that it is not "actually possible" to explain and make these things. We just know that it isn't possble to make them with our current technology.

 

Point two: Being able to explain something, even being able to provide step by step instructions, is much different from being able to make it. Examples for this.

Real life examples. I recently did a research project on nanotechnology. We (the human race as a whole) can explain in full how to make some wonderous little devices that could do stuff such as let people hold their breath for four hours, build buildings in a matter of days from nothing but different kinds of dirt, stuff like that. The problem is that we can't manipulate stuff on a fine enough level to be able to yet. We can push around atoms with an SPM, even make pyramids of them, we can manufacture nanotubes and buckyballs, but we can't make all those nifty atoms into machinery just yet. And even if we could it would be sloooow. (just as an interesting note, if we could rearange atoms however we felt like, we could make any food in the world from dirt water and air)

The second real life example is a proposed modular car chasis. I don't know much about this, but the basics are: all the mechanics of the car (fuel cell, hydrogen fuel tank, gears, cranks, shafts, steering etc.) would be put into a base that would be all at wheel level, then you could purchase any top you wanted to slap on top. You could have a sports car and a pickup sitting in your garage with only one of the bases, and be able to get up in the morning and decide which one you wanted to drive. The problem with this one is we can't get fuel cells small enough to fit in even a large car yet.

 

Now for a fictional example. If we could go back in time, I would bet you whatever you wanted that you couldn't go back to...say...ancient rome and build a computer, no matter what information you took back with you. At least not in a relatively short period of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...