Jump to content

Home

My complaints about Rogue Nine

Redwing

By Redwing
in DownTime: The Pilot's Lounge

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Redwing Newbie

Redwing

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I just want a little editorial balance here. If you disagree with my claim that Comdr. Cracken's wheelings and dealings mean delays in getting things processed, errors in handling requests, inefficiency, and many more years of error from keeping an old system alive, then read no further. He maintains that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. Perhaps it would be best for him to awaken from his delusional narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that the central paradox of his sophistries, the twist that makes his actions so irresistible to inconsiderate pamphleteers, is that these people truly believe that he could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. The last time I told Comdr. Cracken's lieutenants that I want to inculcate in the reader an inquisitive spirit and a skepticism about beliefs that Comdr. Cracken's disciples take for granted, they declared in response, "But "the norm" shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel." Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant. It is certainly the height of ironies that Comdr. Cracken leads me to believe that he is complacent. Let's remember that.

 

This probably does not affect your daily life, but it is a fact. If you can go more than a minute without hearing him talk about interdenominationalism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial. Comdr. Cracken's taradiddles are worthy of a good flush down the toilet. That, in itself, will condemn us to live with mumpish, pusillanimous tax cheats in the coming days. I lost all respect for Comdr. Cracken when I heard he plans to destroy everything beautiful and good. Of that I am certain, because he presents himself as a disinterested classicist lamenting the infusion of politically motivated methods of pedagogy and analysis into higher education. Comdr. Cracken is eloquent in his denunciation of modern scholarship, claiming it favors scummy liars and cheats (especially the sullen type). And here we have the ultimate irony, because Comdr. Cracken thinks we want him to make my stomach turn. Excuse me, but maybe if you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem. Allow me to explain. Comdr. Cracken can't fool me. I've met malicious, power-hungry marauders before, so I know that throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to embrace diversity and those who wish to accelerate the natural tendency of civilization to devolve from order to chaos, liberty to tyranny, and virtue to vice. Naturally, Comdr. Cracken belongs to the latter category.

 

I have a problem with his use of the phrase, "We all know that...". With this phrase, Comdr. Cracken doesn't need to prove his claim that he is known for his sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends; he merely accepts it as fact. To put it another way, he contends that his op-ed pieces are not worth getting outraged about. Sounds rather savage, doesn't it? Well, that's Comdr. Cracken for you.

 

It's easy for him to bombastically declaim my proposals. But when is Comdr. Cracken going to provide an alternative proposal of his own? Unfortunately, I can't give a complete answer to that question in this limited space. But I can tell you that Comdr. Cracken flagrantly abuses rules and regulations and then complains vehemently when caught. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. None but the unstable can deny that I have one itsy-bitsy problem with his declamations. Videlicet, they increase society's cycle of hostility and violence. And that's saying nothing about how if it weren't for doctrinaire rapscallions, he would have no friends. This is particularly interesting when you consider that I wonder what would happen if Comdr. Cracken really did scapegoat easy, unpopular targets, thereby diverting responsibility from more culpable parties. There's a spooky thought.

 

When I was little, my father would sometimes pick me up, put me on his knee, and say "A number of soulless serpents have succumbed to excessive drug use, alcoholism, and other addictive behavior indicating maladaptive mechanisms." It is not uncommon for him to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole subversive affair as some great benefit to humanity. Comdr. Cracken will damage the debate about this issue, because we will have to spend lots of time correcting misunderstandings that are directly attributable to his stratagems.

 

When I say that this is a very real and serious concern, I don't just mean that he wants to throw us into a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation, that he wants to use psychological tools to trick us into doing whatever bitter mystics require of us, or that he wants to judge people based solely on hearsay. Sure, Comdr. Cracken really wants all that, but he also wants much more. He wants to reduce social and cultural awareness to a dictated set of guidelines to follow. After hearing about his depraved attempts to overthrow democratic political systems, I was saddened. I was saddened that he has lowered himself to this level. In asserting that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day, he demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision. I can't follow Comdr. Cracken's pretzel logic. I do, however, know that if you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. He provides none.

 

The sensationalism "debate" is not a debate. It is a harangue, a politically motivated, brilliantly publicized, mischievous attack on progressive ideas. Believe you me, there is no place in this country where we are safe from Comdr. Cracken's attendants, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. Please remember that Comdr. Cracken talks a lot about unilateralism and how wonderful it is. However, he's never actually defined what it means. How can he argue for something he's never defined? Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that this is kind of a touchy subject to some people. Let me recap that for you, because it really is extraordinarily important: He is addicted to the feeling of power, to the idea of controlling people. Sadly, he has no real concern for the welfare or the destiny of the people he desires to lead.

 

Consider the following, which I'll address in greater detail later: Even when Comdr. Cracken isn't lying, he's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable him to regulate antidisestablishmentarianism. He doesn't realize just how tenuous his grasp of reality is. So let him call me nit-picky. I call him obstreperous. Snooty, exhibitionism-prone drug lords must be treated with political justice, not with civil justice, as they are surely not real citizens, but given the way things are these days, we must remember that Comdr. Cracken believes that I'm too ccky to work beyond the predatory plasticity of his ravings. That's just wrong. He further believes that everyone with a different set of beliefs from his is going to get a one-way ticket to Hell. Wrong again!

 

It seems ironic that he accepts superstition for science, hokum and magic for medicine, monotone chanting for music, and lethargic passivity in lieu of discovery and inquiry, given that in these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, his understrappers are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is Cracken, who wants nothing less than to lash out at everyone and everything in sight. For one thing, we can't let ugly goofballs ram his canards down our throats. But more important, he doesn't want us to oppose him and all he stands for. He would rather we settle for the meatless bone of imperialism. Comdr. Cracken's surly announcements convince me of only one thing: that Comdr. Cracken has certainly never given evidence of thinking extensively. Or at all, for that matter.

 

He is inherently lethargic, effrontive, and hypocritical. Oh, and he also has a bookish mode of existence. Why does egotism exist? What causes it? And what provoked Comdr. Cracken to destroy any resistance by channeling it into ineffective paths? To understand the answers to those questions, you first have to realize that we must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that analogy, the chains symbolize Comdr. Cracken's sententious proposed social programs, and the light represents the goal of getting all of us to tell you things that he doesn't want you to know.) That's all I'm going to say in this letter, because if I were to write everything I want to write, I'd be here all night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Camus Newbie

Camus

Posted
Posted
Originally posted by Grand_Admiral_Ice

Wow, Americans really are getting dumber. Why don't you read what we told Cal on the first page.

 

 

...

~tries not to jump out and strangle Ice~

...

~is really really pissed about that last statement~

...

~cant hold out much longer~

:mad:

~snaps and jumps ofter Ice strangling him tell his head pops off~

jk

lol!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jan Gaarni Newbie

Jan Gaarni

Posted
Posted

And yet again I'm being adressed as "princess".

*sigh* :rolleyes:

 

Very well, let the sideshow begin.

 

I wanted to respond to Redwing earlier, but I was so busy, I simply did not have the time. Nevertheless, what I need to say is so important, I knew I simply had to allocate a few minutes to make a brief post on the subject. One of the first facts we should face is that I undeniably dislike Redwing. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to observed facts, such as that there is a simple answer to the question of what to do about Redwing's ****-and-bull stories (scuse the foul language). The difficult part is in implementing the answer. The answer is that we must reach the broadest possible audience with the message that Redwing contributes nothing to society. Now, I am all for freedom of speech, but benighted Marxism has come to occupy a delusional place in the national dialogue. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that the picture I am presenting need not be confined to his smears. It applies to everything Redwing says and does. He should not push our efforts two steps backward. Not now, not ever. Please remember that Redwing's helots often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear.

 

Whether or not you realize this, I wonder if Redwing really believes the things he says. He knows they're not true, doesn't he? To rephrase that question, what in perdition does Redwing think he's doing? Unfortunately, I can't give a complete answer to that question in this limited space. But I can tell you that Redwing's "I'm right and you're wrong" attitude is unstable, because it leaves no room for compromise. Those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to address the continued social injustice shown by peevish, apolaustic adolescents have no right to complain when he and his deputies create an atmosphere of mistrust, in which speculations and rumors gain the appearance of viability and compete openly with more carefully considered theories. Redwing's practices defy common sense. Now, that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true. At the very least, Redwing can't possibly believe that he is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. He's stupid, but he's not that stupid.

 

The underlying message is that his premise (that he never engages in snivelling, crapulous, or materialistic politics) is his morality disguised as pretended neutrality. Redwing uses this disguised morality to support his campaigns, thereby making his argument self-refuting. In the course of my work, I regularly come in contact with what I call malodorous fickle-types, and most of them also feel that it's unfortunate that he has no real education. It's impossible to debate important topics with someone who is so mentally handicapped. Redwing's cause is not glorious. It is not wonderful. It is not good.

 

Impetuous. Semi-intelligible. Delusional. In case you can't tell, I'm

making a direct reference to Redwing. Permit me this forum to rant.

 

Considering the corruption and foolishness that characterize headlong rascals, all he has managed to attain with his jibes is a jab at hardworking individuals. But you knew that already. So let me add that he would have us believe that he can cause riots in the streets and get away with it. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Redwing is surrounded by illogical deadbeats who parrot the same nonsense, which is why it is easy to see faults in others. But it takes perseverance to put to rest the animosities that have kept various groups of people from enjoying anything other than superficial unity. It will not be easy to show principle, gumption, verve, and nerve. Nevertheless, we must attempt to do exactly that, for the overriding reason that I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because if one could get a Ph.D. in Nativism, he would be the first in line to have one. Why am I furious? Because Redwing keeps telling us that his musings are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. Are we also supposed to believe that everyone and everything discriminates against him -- including the writing on the bathroom stalls? I didn't think so. And why am I embarrassed? Because if he continues to make widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up, I will be obliged to do something about him. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations.

 

Shooting one's mouth off in a public forum on the basis of flimsy facts is neither prudent nor smart, at least insofar as this post is concerned. And, more important, Redwing is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore! For those of you out there who don't know what I'm talking about, let me give you a quick explanation: he likes maneuvers that make my blood curdle. Could there be a conflict of interest there? If you were to ask me, I'd say that it's about time the public realized that they are being duped by him and his accomplices. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to review the basic issues at the root of the debate. Perhaps Redwing is not above the law, but remember that by opting for the easy, short-term, feel-good path, he will empty garbage pails full of the vilest slanders and defamations on the clean garments of honorable people sooner or later, which by the way seems to already have started. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but his subordinates think that "Redwing would sooner give up money, fame, power, and happiness than perform a pusillanimous act." First off, that's a lousy sentence. If they had written that the most perceptive members of our society respond positively to my message that we will need to use diverse skills and tactics if we are to reach out for things with permanence, things beyond wealth and comfort and pleasure, things that have real meaning, then that quote would have had more validity. As it stands, Redwing really struck a nerve with me when he said that without his superior guidance, we will go nowhere. That lie is a painful reminder that if you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem. My goal for this post was to report as best as possible the facts and circumstances surrounding Redwing's rotten nostrums. Know that I have done my best while trying always to embark on a new path towards change. Let an honest history judge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Redwing Newbie

Redwing

Posted
  • Author
Posted

(Sorry, but you aren't living that title down :D)

 

Princess Jan Gaarni has had his say, and this is mine. Note that some of the facts I plan to use in this letter were provided to me by a highly educated person who managed to escape Jan's vulgar indoctrination and is consequently believable. A person who wants to get ahead should try to understand the long-range consequences of his/her stances. Jan has never had that faculty. He always does what he wants to do at the moment and figures he'll be able to lie himself out of any problems that arise. He likes to imply that divine ichor flows through his veins. This is what his tricks amount to, although, of course, they're daubed over with the viscid slobber of dangerous drivel devised by his subordinates and mindlessly multiplied by execrable, unrestrained survivalists. Jan tries to make us think the way he wants us to think, not by showing us evidence and reasoning with us, but by understanding how to push our emotional buttons.

 

I oppose his convictions because they are subhuman. I oppose them because they are unenlightened. And I oppose them because they will pamper putrid narrow-minded-types as soon as our backs are turned. If Jan continues to kill the messenger and control the message, I will definitely be obliged to do something about him. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations. His ruses are worse than the Black Death of olden times. I know because I have experienced that personally.

 

He likes to spoon-feed us his pabulum. Such activity can flourish only in the dark, however. If you drag it into the open, Jan and his legates will run for cover, like ****roaches in a dirty kitchen when the light is turned on suddenly during the night. That's why we must create a world in which careerism, commercialism, and authoritarianism are all but forgotten. His effusions are the direct result of a policy of abandonment and neglect. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that I would like to register my strong objection to his teachings? What does Jan have to say about all of this? The answer, as expected, is nothing.

 

When I was little, my father would sometimes pick me up, put me on his knee, and say "Jan labels everything that conflicts with his established way of thinking as debauched propaganda." Please don't ask me to work hand-in-glove with improvident drug addicts. I simply can't do that. What's more, if he is going to break down ages-old institutions and customs, then he should at least have the self-respect to remind himself of a few things: First, I once had a nightmare in which he was free to level filth and slime at everyone opposed to his subliminal psywar campaigns. And second, you, of course, now need some hard evidence that his left hand doesn't know what his right hand is doing. Well, how about this for evidence: Jan's morals are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? To rephrase that question, whatever happened to good sportsmanship? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that we've all heard Jan yammer and whine about how he's being scapegoated again, the poor dear. Jan is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore!

 

Look, his reason is not true reason. It does not seek the truth, but only dim-witted answers, scurrilous resolutions to conflicts. I believe I have found my calling. My calling is to do something about the continuing -- make that the escalating -- effort on Jan's part to expose and neutralize Jan's enemies rather than sit at the same table and negotiate. And just let him try and stop me. Some ruthless scofflaws actually suspect that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty. This is the kind of muddled thinking that Jan is encouraging with his scare tactics. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as sadistic devotees of conspiracy theories. Now that you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a complete surprise that Princess Jan Gaarni and his surrogates are wolves in sheep's clothing who will instill distrust and thereby create a need for his fastidious views sooner than you think. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would lay all of society open to the predations of organized criminality. I am referring, of course, to the likes of Jan Gaarni.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Redwing Newbie

Redwing

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Originally posted by whitedragon

what i want to know is why people from other countrys dislike america. when someone really wants to insult me on the net they say something like "firgures. american, no brain, big mouth" (i kinda edited that comment). is it because of the way we live. WHAT IS IT :confused:

 

There are a number of things I can't stand about America, and I would just love to share them with you. If you disagree with my claim that it's been well documented that America prizes wealth and celebrity over and above decent morals and sound judgment, then read no further. Might I suggest that America search for a hobby? It seems it has entirely too much time on its hands, given how often it tries to distract attention from more important issues. If we call a spade a spade, then the sea of revanchism, on which America so heavily relies, will begin to dry up. Too many emotions to count raced through my mind when I first realized that America is every bit as obdurate as irritating clunks. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that each rung on the ladder of particularism is a crisis of some kind. Each crisis supplies an excuse for America to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools. That is the standard process by which out-of-touch beatniks create anomie. There is a simple answer to the question of what to do about America's beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments). The difficult part is in implementing the answer. The answer is that we must convince the government to clamp down hard on America's musings.

 

In these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, America has an uncanny ability to completely miss the point of any given issue. Am I aware of how America will react when it reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because it shouldn't promote promiscuity and obscene language. That would be like asking a question at a news conference and, too angry and passionate to wait for the answer, exiting the auditorium before the response. Both of those actions play on people's conscious and unconscious belief structures. Nobody wants America to force its moral code on the rest of us, but America insists on doing it anyway. It's really not bloody-mindedness that compels me to protect innocent, little children from disruptive perverts like America. It's my sense of responsibility to you, the reader. America's excuses will have consequences -- very serious consequences. And we ought to begin doing something about that. I could go on and on about America's special form of gangsterism, but you get the general idea.

 

America says it is within its legal right to instill a subconscious feeling of guilt in those of us who disagree with its ventures. Whether or not it indeed has such a right, today, we might have let America interfere with the most important principles of democracy. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will solve the problems that are important to most people. America has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that many people are incredulous when I tell them that it intends to dump effluent into creeks, lakes, streams, and rivers. "How could America be so brutish?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is doubtlessly possible, and now I'll explain exactly how America plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that it coins polysyllabic neologisms to make its tracts sound like they're actually important. In fact, its treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. As that last sentence suggests, America's idiotic claim that everything is happy and fine and good is just that, an idiotic claim. From secret-handshake societies meeting at "the usual place" to back-door admissions committees, America's proxies have always found a way to substitute rumor and gossip for bona fide evidence. Although America has unfairly depicted me and those who share my beliefs as soi-disant do-gooders and sensualists, we are neither. Yes, the time has come to fight to the end for our ideas and ideals, but America's formula for nativism is more sex-crazed than ever. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that some people say that that isn't sufficient evidence to prove that America is secretly scheming to repeat the mistakes of the past. And I must agree; one needs much more evidence than that. But the evidence is there, for anyone who isn't afraid to look at it. Just look at the way that it just reported that its solutions won't be used for political retribution. Do you think that that's merely sloppy reporting on America's part? I don't. I think that it's a deliberate attempt to befuddle the public and make sin seem like merely a sophisticated fashion.

 

America condones the irrational rodomontades that will progressively enlarge and increasingly centralize the means of oppression, exploitation, violence, and destruction. Frankly, I myself do not propose a supernatural solution to the problems we're having with America. Instead, I propose a practical, realistic, down-to-earth approach that requires only that I introduce an important, but underrepresented, angle on its ignorant ravings.

 

I frequently talk about how nonrepresentationalism, in this case, is a tactic tied to a broader strategy of granting America the ability to cashier anyone who tries to instill a sense a responsibility and maturity in those who confuse, disorient, and disunify. I would drop the subject, except that if it had done its homework, it'd know that I find that some of its choices of words in its utterances would not have been mine. For example, I would have substituted "ruthless" for "thyroparathyroidectomize" and "deluded" for "formaldehydesulphoxylic." An armed revolt against America is morally justified. However, I believe that it is not yet strategically justified. Considering the corruption and foolishness that characterize unimaginative pinheads, you don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: America says that it knows the "right" way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli. Yet it also wants to subvert time-tested societal norms. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask, because its scribblings manifest themselves in two phases. Phase one: supplant national heroes with self-deceiving lugs. Phase two: mobilize support for the special interests that dominate state and private activity.

 

By and large, America claims that anyone who dares to address the real issues faced by mankind can expect to suffer hair loss and tooth decay as a result. I think that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves, although I should add that America's method (or school, or ideology -- it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of "America-ism". It is an atrabilious and avowedly prissy philosophy that aims to cause the destruction of human ambition and joy. The problem with America is not that it's negligent. It's that it wants to promote the lie of conformism. I can only operate on today's real -- not tomorrow's ideal -- political terrain if America's army of pugnacious, vengeful knee-biters is decimated down to those whose inborn lack of character permits them to betray anyone and everyone for the well-known thirty pieces of silver. There is no such thing as evil in the abstract. It exists only in the evil deeds of evil organizations like America.

 

America's bons mots are just a rhetorical ploy to get away from the obvious fact that if I hear America's cult followers say, "America's ideas are our final line of defense against tyrrany" one more time, I'm going to throw up. Wage an odd sort of warfare upon a largely unprepared and unrecognizing public if you like, America, because I simply don't care. If America got its way, it'd be able to make excessive use of foul language. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. "America" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone make America's prank phone calls a key dynamic in modern metagrobolism by viscerally defining "phenomenalistic" through the experience of childish extremism, I tell him or her to stop "America-ing".

 

America's reasoning is circular and therefore invalid. In other words, it always begins an argument with its conclusion (e.g., that we should avoid personal responsibility) and therefore -- not surprisingly -- it always arrives at that very conclusion.

 

If an attempt to raise extortionate demands isn't inconsiderate, it certainly is lecherous. So America thinks that it could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else? Interesting viewpoint. Here's another: No one need be surprised if our culture's personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of America. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that every time America tells its hangers-on that divine ichor flows through its veins, their eyes roll into the backs of their heads as they become mindless receptacles of unsubstantiated information, which they accept without question. America's malicious expostulations leave the current power structure untouched while simultaneously killing countless children through starvation and disease. Are these children its enemies? That is, why do its helpers want to ingratiate themselves with it? Fortunately for us, the key to the answer is obvious: If there's an untold story here, it's that it wants to bring about a wonderland of racialism. Why it wants that, I don't know, but that's what it wants.

 

Let me move now from the abstract to the concrete. That is, let me give you a (mercifully) few examples of America's outrageous ineptitude. For starters, its brown-nosing, licentious fairy tales revive an arcadian past that never existed. News of this deviousness must spread like wildfire if we are ever to carry out the famous French admonition, écrasez l'infâme!, against its viewpoints. It is easy for the public at large to dismiss despicable power brokers as beer-guzzling social outcasts. What I mean to say is that America's eccentricity is surpassed only by its vanity. And its vanity is surpassed only by its empty theorizing. (Remember its theory that society is supposed to be lenient towards vitriolic fiends?) Finally, any mistakes in this letter are strictly my fault. But if you find any factual error or have more updated information on the subject of America, America-inspired versions of fetishism, etc., please tell me, so I can write an even stronger letter next time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
whitedragon Newbie

whitedragon

Posted
Posted
Originally posted by Redwing

It's quite easy, actually...

 

;)

ok i dont give a **** where your from any more but im so pissed off that i could go looking for your ass but im not that type of guy. i dident read half of your bull**** that you posted but i got the general idea. america is evil. have you seen my posts and have known me ok. DO I ACT LIKE A ****ING DEVIL WORSHIPER. if were so evil then why have we for the entire time weve been a country went out of our way to help others in need and even fought other peoples wars. even now wew giveing food to the afgan people who are innosent for the tragity on sep 11.

another thing about your bull**** post that really pisses me off, you concentrated on showing every little tiny thing wrong with my country instead of trying to find the good things that weve done in the past. im not saying that my countrys perfect im sick of alot of things in america but im not acting like the devil is running the ****ing country.

 

so dont try to make me your ****ing enemy because you wouldent like it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...