Jump to content

Home

Yoda's Swamp: Ep.2


DiRtY $oUtH™

Recommended Posts

well, nothing personal, understand, I am not trying to create conflict, or anything of the nature, but off topic whatnots go to the swamp. A follw link will be left, however. ;)

 

For a topic-

 

Should we go to war with Iraq?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OOhhhhhh good question!

 

I think that Saddam has to be a little bit more cooperative with the UN, that's first.

 

I'm not at all an expert on the situation........but if someone doesn't want you in a place lookin' around, my feeling is they are hiding something from you. :(

 

I'd rather not go to war, but you gotta do wat'cha gotta do.....and I'm really tired of Saddam....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read an article in the paper today about how an Iraqi Vice President said the US/Iraq conflict should be settled by a personal duel between Gworge Bush Jr & Saddam Husseion.. referred by none other than Kofi Annan. It was the first time I laughed out loud at the usual depressing morning paper. The Iraqi VP's idea was that this would save the lives of US and Iraqi troops & civilians. The Bush Administration said they weren't taking the suggestion seriously... but I dunno. At least It would make good television. Imagine the pay per view ratings. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, but we don't need to go to war for the head of one guy... People there hate him, again, I'm no scholar at this either, but how hard could it be to get sleeper agents in there, and just put a bullet in his head? Why do we need to blow up innocent people?

 

-edit- lmfao NerfYoda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if we send weapons inspectors, they might get taken prisoners of war(declared by Iraq). I don't know if I can really explain why I think that, It's just a gut feeling.

 

As for full scale war, I hope it doesn't come to that. But if it does, the UN will be ready, I feel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem I have with bombing is that is gonna kill not only realitivly innocent Iraqi troops, but whenever we bomb, we always seem to screw it up, and blow up a hospitel or something...

 

And bombing always leads to a follow-through land invasion... And that's just putting our troops at risk, I mean, we already KNOW there was somethin screwy in the air during Desert Storm... now it's only MORE likely that our troops will get posioned and other bad stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok listen...

 

just becasue you kill saddam does not mean it is over, they will still have the "weapons of mass destruction", all the troops will be alive and probaly angered in to an attack, and do you really think he just sleeps with out like an army out side of his house?

 

i think this will come to bombing(a lot) and some small invasions into weakened areas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I am a weapon expert or anything, but if you bomb the mass destruction weapons, wouldn't they go off?

 

In addition, just to inform you Datheus...the United States attempts to strike non-civilian areas during war..that is what sets us apart from other countries...I think we need to do what i in our best interest..

 

Sure, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki was non-civillian areas too, right? Hundreds of thousands civillian killed just because the US wanted to test their nuclear bombs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...