Nute Gunray Posted January 17, 2003 Posted January 17, 2003 Originally posted by K_Kinnison and people forget that man is the best EDURANCE runner on the earth. Why bother seeing who the fastest when we know the cheetah is the fastest land animal on the earth The Zebra did the 100m in 9.957 seconds. The fastest time the guy that raced the Zebra ever did the 100m was 9.94. He's capable of actually being faster than a Zebra. And he's not even close to the world record. Michael Johnson would have walked all over the zebra.
Gold leader Posted January 17, 2003 Posted January 17, 2003 Not if the zebra was hunting for a new pr. It's not fair this way. You should take an average zebra and an average man to compete. Or a trained zebra and a trained man.
Nute Gunray Posted January 17, 2003 Posted January 17, 2003 i assume the zebra was trained. all the other animals were.
Kylilin Posted January 17, 2003 Author Posted January 17, 2003 Maybe the Zebra was focused like Carl Lewis said it needed to be.
Zargon Posted January 17, 2003 Posted January 17, 2003 Originally posted by K_Kinnison Frankly, who is the wise guy that figured out 60 midgets equals 1 Elephant? or that a human being has the same appitite as a Bear? and people forget that man is the best EDURANCE runner on the earth. Why bother seeing who the fastest when we know the cheetah is the fastest land animal on the earth Frankly, this is a waste of time to even bother to watch, it is so messed up from the start. dude, endurance doesnt matter if you start in about hte same place the thing chasing you is alot faster, you have to get away first ya know......
Kylilin Posted January 17, 2003 Author Posted January 17, 2003 I think in the next edition there should be a man vs. and animal in some sort of swimming race. Or maybe just a swimsuit competition.
Nute Gunray Posted January 18, 2003 Posted January 18, 2003 Originally posted by Kylilin Maybe the Zebra was focused like Carl Lewis said it needed to be. You could tell by looking in it's eyes. That zebra was focused.
Kylilin Posted January 18, 2003 Author Posted January 18, 2003 I guess the trainers really got that Zebra psyched up...
Jabba The Hunt Posted January 19, 2003 Posted January 19, 2003 Originally posted by Admiral Simple, the producers know that a majority of people are dumb, don't like thinking for themselves, and will accept crappy shows. So instead fo making good ones they make crappy ones and hype it up. People then watch the shows out of fear of being excluded from others. This goes for any country, most people are idiots who like to follow others. Did any of your read this?
-s/<itzo- Posted January 23, 2003 Posted January 23, 2003 Originally posted by Kylilin I guess the trainers really got that Zebra psyched up... the zebra wasn't even tryin. the zebra was just havin a jog.
SuicidalXWing Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 I wanna see an elephant vs the Man of Steel. You know, Christopher Reeves in his wheelchair pulling the plane. LOL, can you picture that? Ok, that was bad. But just picture it, its funny. Shame what happened to him. How dare they remake the Superman movie. He is Superman, there is no other. And he always will be Superman damn it!
edlib Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 I think it would have been far more entertaining if the planes suddenly fired up their engines and started pulling down the runway with elephant and little people helplessly in tow. Now that would be GREAT TV! Think of the free publicity when PETA and the SPCA got a load of that one. Oh, and there just might be a few people upset about the little people too... Hmmmmm... perhaps I shouldn't be giving the producers any ideas.
Cmdr. Cracken Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 I'd pay good money to see 60 some odd midgets being towed by a 747. good money.
edlib Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 HEY! Why don't we get the planes out of the picture altogether and put the elephant and the little people in a death-match arena! To make it a totally fair match-up, the elephant should be completely armored head-to-toe and sufficiently enraged before the battle starts (I'm thinking cattle-prods and several gallons of PCP.) The little people should be completely naked and weaponless, except of course for thier hands, feet, and teeth. (And maybe a little PCP for them, too!)
Rogue Nine Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 You just have a naked little people fetish, don't you?
edlib Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Why? Do you happen to have any naked little people? ADDENDUM: Set-up huge P.A. speakers around the combat arena poining inward and blast (at least 130dB) a continuous loop of the chorus to Randy Newman's "Short People (Ain't Got No Reason To Live)" to further "inspire" the participants. What? Too far?
Admiral Odin Posted January 24, 2003 Posted January 24, 2003 Nah, your forgetting the pits of boiling oil, and other traps.
Kylilin Posted January 25, 2003 Author Posted January 25, 2003 Add a couple of brightly colored jumpsuits, and a few referees, and you've got a re-hash of the American Gladiators.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.