Ray Stantz Posted July 24, 2004 Posted July 24, 2004 Well this is according to the "Just the Facts" page on TheForce.net Count Dooku's Ep3 role is brief. From what I hear about his death though, Dooku will never be the "Head" of the Sith Order. That is the way it is though. You get old and then you start to lose it.
Sivy Posted July 24, 2004 Posted July 24, 2004 well from all the info and rumours I’ve heard I think Anakin decapitates dooku after rescuing palpatine. He will probably strike him down in anger and in an unsporting fashion too, maybe dooku’s unarmed or something. Another step close to the darkside for Anakin. After this palatine makes Anakin his personal bodyguard. (which is probably the reason behind the whole fake kidnapping thing.)
Van Moob Posted October 5, 2004 Posted October 5, 2004 i agree with the ani kills dooku theory.....he has the most motive, because at the start of ep 4 admiral piett tellls the other imperial senators that vadar just disintigrated the rest of the council (meaning the ones who didn't die in ep2) so thats my theory. dooku doesn't kill mace...vadar does...
jedispy Posted May 21, 2005 Posted May 21, 2005 The circle is now complete. Let's see how I did on my prophesy: Originally posted by jedispy *Anakin will duel Dooku/Tyranus once more. <--- CORRECT!! *Anakin will seek revenge instead of justice.<--- CORRECT!! *Anakin will duel Dooku/Tyranus with all of the rage and hatred in his heart. He will best the Sith Lord. oooh....close *He will chop off Dooku/Tyranus' hand just as his was.<--- CORRECT!! *He will not kill Dooku/Tyranus immediately. Enter Sidious.<--- CORRECT!! *The Sith Master will walk on scene and suprise Anakin. Nah...not really. but it does happen later on *Anakin will turn to challenge the Sith Master, leaving the weakened Dooku/Tyranus alone. nah...not really *Still wearing the cloak, Sidius will duel Anakin (I predict with two red sabers.) Nah...not at all *Anakin will be no match for the Sith Master. again, not even close *Sidius will lower his blades and begin the all too familiar Emperor cackle. "Good boy. Very good." Pretty close on this one *Sidius will remove the hood to reveal his true identity. Nope *Anakin, confused and dismayed, will lower his lightsaber in allegience. <---CORRECT!! *Palpatine: "You have done well. Now finish him," pointing to Dooku "and take his place at my side." Pretty much correct *Anakin will lift his head, and in rage will kill Dooku. Kinda correct *Anakin Skywalker now ceases to exist as Palpatine coronates the Sith birth of Darth Vader. <--- CORRECT!! I swear that I did not look at any spoilers either. I refused to read one spoiler this entire time. Let me tell you, it was hard, but I finally made it. I'm just that fricking smart!!!!!!!!!!!
Ranre Posted May 21, 2005 Posted May 21, 2005 It wasnt smarts, but intuition and good instincts. But I have to admit, that was pretty good.
redsaberpro Posted September 30, 2005 Posted September 30, 2005 Count Dooku, better known as Darth Tyrannus, was killed while Anakin and Obi-Wan were trying to rescue the chancellor, and it was before the jedi went after Gen. Grievous
Van Moob Posted September 30, 2005 Posted September 30, 2005 Yeah...we know that, thanx mate. the movie has been out for like 3 months now. also he is better known as dooku not tyrannas
jedispy Posted September 30, 2005 Posted September 30, 2005 LOL. It's aight. no foul. Hey...did you guys know that Leia is Luke's sister?
Kain Posted September 30, 2005 Posted September 30, 2005 Did you guys know that thread revival is bad?
Kurgan Posted September 30, 2005 Posted September 30, 2005 LOL. It's aight. no foul. Hey...did you guys know that Leia is Luke's sister? I know. Somehow, I've always known...
Van Moob Posted September 30, 2005 Posted September 30, 2005 Wow. i found something else out on this top secret 'everything revealed' site, did you guys know that Darth Vadar is really lukes father?? hehehe and yeh thread revival is bad so you should ban redsabrepro lol
Kurgan Posted October 1, 2005 Posted October 1, 2005 redsaberpro is new here, prehaps he doesn't realize how "annoying" he's being by reply mostly to old threads. But he's certainly no criminal for doing so. See, it wouldn't be a problem if people contributed to a "revived" thread. We really have no rule against such a practice. It becomes a problem because people immediately go "on no you revived a thread!" and start spamming (as we've seen above). So next time, at least put in something meaningful. That goes for all of you. Moving on then...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.