Alegis Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 Originally posted by tFighterPilot I have GeforceFX5200. It looks like it will barely run the game if it's only recomended. Same for the RAM. An FX is a good card. I recently upgraded from geforce 4 mx 420 to ati radeon 9800 pro, did some benchmarkings etc. Its 14 months old, but with the graphics bf has... recommended means you'll be able to play the game easily. Minimum is where the game can be played and minor issues may occur
Whoopknacker Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 Forget this specs junk and getting people in a tiffy. LucasArts should just get us a demo and call it that. There are so many factors invovled with your PCs performance. I think that the best bet is the demo.
Mountainforest Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 I got a real small hard disk. Only 20 gigs.
Clone_Fighter Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 Originally posted by Mountainforest I got a real small hard disk. Only 20 gigs. Lucky you... I got 8.6.....
Master William Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 Originally posted by tFighterPilot I have GeforceFX5200. It looks like it will barely run the game if it's only recomended. Same for the RAM. no, that's in the Minimum case. If it's recommended, then you're in a good position
JDKnite188 Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 Finally! My current system won't run it just because of the processor speed. I have everything else required. Wow. With these high requirements, the game is going to obviously look astounding.
tFighterPilot Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 Originally posted by Alegis An FX is a good card. I recently upgraded from geforce 4 mx 420 to ati radeon 9800 pro, did some benchmarkings etc. Its 14 months old, but with the graphics bf has... recommended means you'll be able to play the game easily. Minimum is where the game can be played and minor issues may occur In theory perhaps. In the real world you usually need more than the recomended. The companies usually lower the requirements so more people would buy it
Master William Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 Well crap... I wanna upgrade my RAM but it seems I've fallen into a messy hole. Goddamn PCs
Whoopknacker Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 This is another reason why the consoles are popular. You have more people turning away from PCs because of some of the high specs which means more $$$. Counter Strike is the most popular online game hands down and that has to do with good game play and the fact that you only need a Pentium II, 16mb graphics, 128 ram, and a dial up. Editorial: I think its crazy when people shell a grand or more towards a system. You can build a top of the line gaming system for $700. IMO Alienware and gamer systems are a rip off. You want a gamer system best bet is to build one.
Master William Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 Yeah but that's still a lot of money. My parents have money, but I doubt they would actually buy me parts, not to mention actually inserting them into the damn PC is a mystery, I want someone to do it for me.
Schetter Posted September 3, 2004 Author Posted September 3, 2004 Originally posted by Whoopknacker You can build a top of the line gaming system for $700. I beg to differ. Sure, building your own machine will run cheaper than the brand names, but for a hands-down top of the line machine at any given time you're going to have to put down at least $1500. Hell, the best graphics cards on the market always run about $400...by your figure that doesn't leave room for much else...
SITH_ShadowCat Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 I know there would be no problem running this game on my comp (upgraded just for this game), but will it run on max settings? P4 2.1 GHz 1GB RAM ATI RADEON 9800 Pro 128MB I can run UT2004 at max setting and get really god frame rate 40-50fps. Hmmm, we'll just have to wait and see how this game really runs. And I've never seen a difference of 1 GHz for the processor going from minimum to recommended, what's up with that?
Master William Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 Damn, I really wanna go get it for Xbox and play Xbox Live or something.... but then again I want it for my PC... but then again my PC isn't exactly the best thing out there... 1,67 GHZ 256 RAM Geforce 4 MX 420 64 MB AMD ATHLON XP 2000+ Well that's all I know, I want more RAM but I need to know what kind of RAM I already do have, and another 100 things that sort of make me go
THE BADGER: Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 Mine is a dinosaur!!!! 767 mhz 64 mb ram 40 gb drive and it gets worse from there. I will be buying a new one when I get my income taxes in this coming year. Until then I will play with my PS2 for gaming. LOL:D
Tyler_Durden Posted September 3, 2004 Posted September 3, 2004 Originally posted by _reTrY How will the game run with a 64mb nvidia geforce mx 4 video card? Can someone tell me? Yeah i have a 64 MB card and i can run battlefield vietnam in 1024x768 setting with medium to high detail. The game runs at a smooth 60 fps, don't worry. Their requirements are actually higher than this game's i think.
lukeskywalker1 Posted September 5, 2004 Posted September 5, 2004 Think it will run on mine, I only have one problem 512 RAM Intel Celeron 2.8 Ghz About 50 Gigs left AND... the problem: Intel 845G with 64 RAM. I know it doesn't support Hardware Transform and Lighting (T&L) Capability, and most likley not that pixel.. thing *CRIES Well, with a few graphics fixes, I was able to run Max Payne 2, KOTOR and ROTK on this PC, with minor FPS issues. And those are some system intensive games!
Mountainforest Posted September 5, 2004 Posted September 5, 2004 You guys really need to update your site! System requirments are not on it, waepons are not on it, armies are not on it, etc.
tFighterPilot Posted September 5, 2004 Posted September 5, 2004 Yeah, I noticed it also. They didn't update none of these since the game was announced.
Schetter Posted September 5, 2004 Author Posted September 5, 2004 Originally posted by lukeskywalker1 Intel 845G with 64 RAM. Is that 'integrated graphics'? I'm guessing you've got 'integrated sound' too. I'd be real suprised if you'd be able to run this game at a playable framerate, if at all.
WICKET_STBF Posted September 5, 2004 Posted September 5, 2004 Everything on my pc is good to support the game its only my processor 900mhz!!!and I have a ''ATI RADEON 9800 pro''!!
Darth_ToMeR Posted September 5, 2004 Posted September 5, 2004 Originally posted by Alegis Good idea. Will be taken care of Yeah. this game has the most unupdated site i ever seen. They should have put all the information until now but they still have to update a lot.
WICKET_STBF Posted September 5, 2004 Posted September 5, 2004 If there is a pc demo i will dwld it a try it.I will know if my pc can support it!!
Schetter Posted September 5, 2004 Author Posted September 5, 2004 Originally posted by Darth_ToMeR Yeah. this game has the most unupdated site i ever seen. They should have put all the information until now but they still have to update a lot. This is not an official site pal.
Darth_ToMeR Posted September 5, 2004 Posted September 5, 2004 Originally posted by Schetter This is not an official site pal. I'm talking about http://lucasarts.com/games/swbattlefront/
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.