Revan Solo Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 I think there will be a similar game in the next year(s) but not such a game called Battlefront 2. I guess, they will call it a other name than Battlefront 2 because it would sound a little bit like Battlefield 2.
ParanoidAndroid Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 They would probably give it a name like Star wars Battlefront: The revenge of the Sith expansion or somthing like that i bet they will around when the next movie comes out
sup3rsnail Posted February 14, 2005 Posted February 14, 2005 The most we'll see is a really big patch or new maps. There's really nothing more they can expand on... Unless they go EU.
TK-8252 Posted February 14, 2005 Posted February 14, 2005 Originally posted by sup3rsnail Unless they go EU. They already did.
sup3rsnail Posted February 14, 2005 Posted February 14, 2005 Originally posted by TK-8252 They already did. Very slight EU, you mean. I'm talking about REAL EU. With new species and the like. Like those creatures with vehicles and weapons that are actually living things.
Revan Solo Posted February 15, 2005 Posted February 15, 2005 Most of the game is EU! Because every place they created and that we haven't seen in any movies, is EU.
Redtech Posted February 15, 2005 Posted February 15, 2005 The whole game is EU. You can win as the Empire, Storm Troopers are actually dangerous.. Personally, they don't need to use the Vong, they have dozens of planets mentioned in the books and other games. I mean how cool would it be to visit places from the Clone Wars Game or Naboo's moon, or Nul Hutta etc.
Pho3nix Posted February 15, 2005 Posted February 15, 2005 Nope, I don't think so. Battlefront is a fairly new game.
Redtech Posted February 16, 2005 Posted February 16, 2005 What's the age of a game got to do with the locations you visit? Empire @ war isn't around yet and has more levels.
Revan Solo Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 Empire at War is at the time of the Empire and it is a RTS.
Redtech Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 I know that. I was one of the first people to know about Petroglyph's new game, being a follower of Westwood Studio's Command and Conquer series. But let's put it this way. You don't exactly have to create an extensive number of single player maps and multiplayer ones, like in Halo 1/2. They're all multiplayer, so it shouldn't be too difficult for a group of people who work 9-5 creating maps to create some that reach the mid double-digits. Heck, have you ever played a game that had too many? Battle For Middle Earth takes the trend that all the multiplayer maps are the single-player ones, as does battlefront. Ultimately, it saves time.
Revan Solo Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 Empire at War is a Commando and Conquer? I thought Battle for Middleearth is a follower of C&C?
Redtech Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 You should visit Planetcnc.com sometimes. EA bought out Westwood studios and the rights to the CnC Franchise, but a lot of the core Westwood staff (or staff that were sacked) formed Petroglyph. BTW, I'm not being abusive, it's a known fact in the CnC community that Generals is not a "true" Command and Conquer (and BfME by association). It's the equivalent of Speilberg doing Star Wars episodes 7,8,9.
Masterme5 Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 If a SWBF II comes out, it will probably be an expansion pack.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.