Jump to content

Home

real life vs the internet


Natty

Recommended Posts

Posted

Pink: so big boy...

Red: you're not a REAL girl

Pink: What? Yes I am!

Red: a REAL girl?

Guy in background: Who's a girl?? I like girls!

Red: Shutup you

Pink: Yes. I really am a girl hee hee hee hee hee

Red: Send me a naked picture

Pink: ... OK!

Guy in background: I LOVE ANGELINA JOLIE! Does anyone else like Angelina Jolie? She's got ENOURMOUS lips!!

Posted
  Mr Flibble said:
I was going to make that joke, but then I thought better of it.
I was going to make that joke and then I thought better of it too, but then I came back to this thread in a drunken stupour and thought better of it again, cancelling out the first better for it equalling a worse for it.
Posted

Why? it makes perfect sense to me.

 

Maybe you should get raped...twice. Maybe then you'll feel different.

 

 

Yes, I do feel worse for it.

Posted

Leave him alone, you monsters!! He can't help it. He has... may god have mercy... he has Linux... *sob* As if that wasn't bad enough already, now you heartless people make his life even worse!!

Posted

The audio stream is broken, or at least not standard conform... That's what it sounds like on my end... Also, there are quite alot "lavc_audio: error" lines in the debug output of MPlayer...

Posted

standard:

"5. Something, such as a practice or a product, that is widely recognized or employed, especially because of its excellence."

--dictionary.com

 

It's not necessarily what some people decided, but what the masses do.

Posted

From The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing (19 Sep 2003) [foldoc]:

 standard

    <standard> Standards are necessary for [b]interworking,
    portability, and reusability[/b].  They may be de facto
    standards for various communities, or officially recognised
    national or international standards.

    Andrew Tanenbaum, in his Computer Networks book, once said,
    "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of
    them to choose from", a reference to the fact that [b]competing
    standards become a source of confusion, division,
    obsolescence[/b], and duplication of effort instead of an
    enhancement to the usefulness of products.

    Some bodies concerned in one way or another with computing
    standards are IAB (RFC and STD), ISO, ANSI, DoD,
    ECMA, IEEE, IETF, OSF, W3C.

 

(Emphasis mine)

Posted
  Mr Flibble said:
The ironing is delicious.
You meant irony, right? :p

 

I'd say that was a Freudian slip, but I don't know what that would actually mean...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...