Jump to content

Home

Bush Runs Away with Heisman.


Jeff

Recommended Posts

I think Reggie will be one of the top running backs in the league next year already. He dominates so much in college, he just seems like he's been ready for the nfl all year. But of course the college game is different so there's always the possibility for failure.

 

EDIT: Running Back @ Obi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As sick as I'm getting of USC, He definitely deserves it.

I'm also thankful for them not putting Leinart up against Archie:D (that's your plan D-Mo, I just know it;))

 

As for the NFL, He is an undeniably good athlete...who's going to end up on an undeniably bad team;) He could be one of the greatest NFL backs, but if he's behind a bad line and qb then he's going nowhere.

I actually saw a commentary on the Titans/Texans game the other day, it seemed to be a poor performance on both sides, and the main question was who was trying the hardest to get reggie bush;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EDIT: Running Back @ Obi

Hey, anyone want to debate the difference between running back and tailback? :smirk2:

 

Yeah, I don't know about the guidelines Heisman voters are given to help them determine who to vote for, most outstanding versus most valuable.

 

In my mind, Reggie Bush had a fantastic year but if you take Reggie Bush out of the USC lineup USC still would have been a very formidable team, perhaps not undefeated, but still a team to be reckoned with and definitely ranked among the top 10 teams. Take Vince Young out of the Texas lineup though and I think you're looking at a team that would not have done nearly as well. In short, I think Vince Young is worth more to Texas than Reggie Bush is to USC because USC has so many other weapons to go to besides Bush.

 

All I know is that I'm looking forward to the Rose Bowl as the Heisman situation has certainly cast a new log onto the already roaring fire for the game that will determine this year's college football champion.

*** rubs hands in anticipation ***

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you can't put that on the player. It's not Reggie Bush's fault that his team is amazing and they would still be good without him. I think they vote by most talented, that way it takes away the stuff that the players can't control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^

Yes, well that is true but IMHO it's still such a subjective criteria that it doesn't make a difference. Was Reggie Bush that much more spectacular than Vince Young to have garnered 89% of the Heisman votes? I, for one, don't think so. When it comes to comparing an elite tailback against an elite quarterback it's really an apples vs. oranges comparison as far as I'm concerned. In the end it seems like it's just a popularity contest which is unfortunate but also unavoidable with the way the sports media works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carson Palmer, Barry Sanders, Marcus Allen, O.J Simpson, Ricky Williams (before the pot), Eddie George, Roger Staubach, Earl Campbell... I could go on.

 

Eric Crouch, Jason White*, Chris Weinkie, Ron Dayne, Danny Wuerffel, Rashaan Salaam, Charlie Ward, Gino Torretta, Desmond Howard (good returner, thats it), Ty Detmer, Andre Ware.... I could go on too.

 

I was mostly making a joke, but the Heisman does not mean NFL success.

 

Ricky Williams was nothing special before the pot either. He had one 1000 yard season with the Saints and had a tendency to fumble, a lot. Basically, his running style is this- Run hard up the middle, make contact, and look for a place to fall. He had no heart, ever. Williams only made it in college because he was so physically impressive. The only good year he had was his first season with Miami.

 

*hehe- thanks Darth Moeller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait a sec, DM. Aren't you the one who stated you thought Bush would win but were surprised at Bush's margin of victory? I reread the article you linked to and I incorrectly stated in my previous post that Bush got 89% of the total votes. According to the ESPN article, Bush actually received 91.7% of the total points available and 84.9% of the 1st place votes in the Heisman vote. I quote from the article:

The USC junior tailback won the highest percentage of first-place votes and the highest percentage of points (awarded on a 3-2-1 basis) in the 71-year history of the award.

So 84.9% of the Heisman voters thought Reggie Bush was a more outstanding player than Vince Young, right? That's what I don't understand. I personally would have had a hard time choosing between Reggie Bush and Vince Young if I were a Heisman voter. I don't necessarily think that Reggie Bush shouldn't have won the Heisman but IMO there is no way he should have won by that kind of margin. Vince Young had an outstanding year as well but to have finished so far behind Bush in the voting is still inconceivable to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...