jonathan7 Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 <snip> TO be honest SS001, I see this all as posturing and nothing more; I think there will eventually be a WW3, but I don't think it will be started by the U.S and Russia; I think it will be Middle East in origin.
Arcesious Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 One thing all politicians need to learn: Bluffs and compromises only work for so long.
Rev7 Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 One thing that I have to say is, if they (Russia) has nuclear weapons, who says that they can't use them? A threat is a threat. Russia and America are not friends, as I am sure all of you already know. They would probably just be an excuse to attack. I think that we should take it seriously, though. All that we can really do is make assumptions. I certainly hope that it doesn't happen. :/ This potential attack could be nuclear or conventional. I hope that neither happen...
Arcesious Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 Indeed. It would be nice if leaders of countries started being reasonable for once. However, I do not think that the defense system is needed too much. Enough with all the walls, secrets, and century-old grudges- let's start working together on these things for once, and be more open-minded. We'll still need walls against idiots, but nothing will work unless if we have walls of united countries, instead of seperated ones. The problem is that we spend too much time speculating and bickering. WWII proved that immediate action works. We've disucssed all these things quite a bit. We should know by now what works and doesn't work. And now that we do, let's start seeing some more coordinated immediate action.
Rev7 Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 I really do wish that there was (is, I guess) peace. World peace. That meaning no more wars, threats, ect. What a world that would be.... :/
Nedak Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 World peace would be impossible. We just aren't designed that way.
jonathan7 Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 World peace would be impossible. We just aren't designed that way. People like you disgust me, world peace is possible, just as soon as I've killed you The Mugabe way.... 'We shall have peace'.
Rev7 Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 World peace would be impossible. We just aren't designed that way. I wish that I could prove you wrong. :/ People like you disgust me, world peace is possible, just as soon as I've killed you The Mugabe way.... 'We shall have peace'.
Arcesious Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 World peace would be impossible. We just aren't designed that way. Heh, world peace may never be, but a stable, free, peaceful system of sorts for a considerable portion of mankind is possible.
JediAthos Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 I would wager that the military, the state department, CIA, NSA, and whatever alphabet soup agency you can name have examined possible outcomes to this process before they went ahead with it. I would also wager that they are fully aware of Russia's capabilities, and most likely where their missiles are and what the likelihood(sp) is that they would use them. Since the cold war ended Russia's economy has been in the toilet, and their military is a mere shadow of what it once was. I'm not saying that they shouldn't be listened to, but I am saying is that their possible actions were considered way before the Czechs were even approached.
Achilles Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 We will have world peace ...the moment we discover an alien civilization with abundant natural resources and comparable-or-lesser technology.
Achilles Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 I hope that we pick a better name than that Also, I vote that Rev7 gets to be Locutus.
Totenkopf Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 At the rate we seem to be going, I'd wager on world piece(s).
Rev7 Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 I hope that we pick a better name than that Also, I vote that Rev7 gets to be Locutus. Might I ask why? :/
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.