Jump to content

Home

The question/answer thread....


Tyrion

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

1 question.what does "the light"mean?

 

My answers so far-

 

1.Our closest star,the sun,isnt 1000 years away.

2.1000 years away is not a measurement of length.

 

I'm trying my hardest to find out the answer-DO NOT TELL ME THE ANSWER IF I GET IT WRONG!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no it isnt 100 years away , thats not the point the figure could be 1000000000000000 or 10 years away its only off putting. Again the measurement of the speed of light is much the same.

 

A small clue. Light that we see does not travel at the same speed as the particle of light itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No i know that but when you state the planet is 1000 years away it basicly means. It takes a thousand years to get there. you didnt give us a lenth of measurement you gave us the exact measurement of time and asked how much time it would take to get there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok Higher physics dont work on every one by the looks of it (no offence but it obvisouly dont)

 

ok let me try re-phrase that

 

Imagine a particle of light (altho we dont actually know if it is made up of partiles , but that aint important). Now Light travels at 3x10 to the power of 8 m/s. Now how long does it take to travel 1 light year. It terms of Light. No payload , no Cargo , no weight. How long does the light take to get there. This is outta one of my physics books. It took me ages to find it out when I handed it in wrong. But i did tell you it was a trick question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"higher physics"I just graduated out of elementary school yesterday-I never studied physics:D Hell,I dont even know what m/s means...

 

But,onto my answer...I'll answer when I look up all this words....:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not that I'm disagreeing with you altoghether but the question is worded incorrectly. If the planet is 1000 Light Years away thats a different story.

 

 

but if I dumbed down the elements of the question and I said to you, I'm driving in my car to california, The border is 20 minutes away. My car is going 65/MPH. How long did it take me to get there.

 

The answer is 20 minutes... Speed is irrelivant in this situation.

 

 

Understand where i'm coming from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Zindell, that the question itself has the answer in it, with the way it has been written.

 

It says the closest star is 1000 years away, whether that be light years, or the actual time taken at whatever speed it is travelled at.

 

If you are insinuating that by travelling at the speed of light, that no time will pass, that time will be at a stand still when travelling at that speed. That by travelling at the speed of light, IF it was possible to see a clock, or watch, and travelled away from it at the speed of light, then it would APPEAR to look like it took no time at all to get there. That is more of an optical "trick" of using the basis of a object on Earth you travel away from.

 

I see this as a question that gives the answer away in the facts themselves, but I think Darth Seph has a different question in mind than the one posted, or the one posted doesn't present enough of the facts, or is asking us to use some lateral thinking...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...