Jump to content

Home

Rogue Squadron 3 Announced


Recommended Posts

I may not sound like it but i'm picky too... I mean I'm VERY lucky to have gotten Prime on the first day it was out. Most other times I would have gotten a game a year after it's release date...

 

But my next target now is The Wind Waker :p which comes out May 3rd down here, can't wait :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I had no idea! How was I suppose to know that if they didn't put Rogue Squadron II: Rogue Leader on Playstion, Playstation 2, or PC. Because those are the only systems I have. I don't have a Gamecube and I won't buy one. If Lucasarts would quit their policy of just releasing certain games on one system then maybe they would make more money and sell more copies of video games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'll give u a couple of points on why Factor 5 (LucasArts doesn't sound like it has much of a say on anything in the RS series except to provide the SW theme) is the way it is with it's games.

 

1. Factor 5 is a 2nd party developer for Nintendo. They also helped with the developing of the GameCube (very little but still)...

 

2. Factor 5 told us in many interviews that (and this is my favourite part) the PS2 would just not handle Rogue Leader's graphics at all.

 

3. and I have a strong feeling Factor 5 doesn't want to be involved with Microsoft :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes Rogue Leader is fully capable of running on PC, but Rogue Leader was also designed specifically for the GameCube by Factor 5. It was a test of what the GCN could achieve with it's first generation games. Yeah afterwards it coulda been released on PC but I don't think Factor 5 had any interest in doing that in the first place... they were already busy developing new software for games for the GCN after RL was made. And it takes a lot to convert a game, more than people realise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by StarWarsPhreak

Not really. Just crash into the command bridge and it's dead :p .... but one thing I don't get. SDs have an Auxilitory(sp?) Bridge (back-up). Why didn't they regain control?

 

I think that's up there with "Why does the game say that the Star Destroyer's reactor is a third shield generator?" :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1)I don't have a GC, so this makes me more angry than when i heard the second Rogue Suqadron came out for GC only.

 

2)I think they didn't get control of the SSD because they never thought they needed to use the aux. bridge, so it was probably poorly maintained, and no-one drilled to get down there fast enough. That, and the C.O kinda died..... ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Lynk Former

I like the fact that such tight turns can be made in space when the only propulsion is coming from a couple of engines at the back.

 

Actually there's thruster jets or repulsors or...something. I don't remember, but I do remember there's an explanation.

 

I wondered about the fire myself ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...