Boba Rhett Posted September 30, 2003 Posted September 30, 2003 Turns out Return of the King clocks in at... drum roll please, ... ... Three hours and Thirty minutes! Thank you and good night.
Surfnshannon Posted September 30, 2003 Posted September 30, 2003 damn.... as long as it is better than the first!! I loved the second one - though the tree's were corny. That's a friggin long movie!!
Crazy_dog no.3 Posted September 30, 2003 Posted September 30, 2003 Just think of the Extended Edition!
Surfnshannon Posted September 30, 2003 Posted September 30, 2003 The extended edition..... I could think of so many better things to do with 10 hours of my life j.k
JediMasterEd Posted September 30, 2003 Posted September 30, 2003 Wow... Wow... Wow... Three hours and a half taken away from my life...which I normally spend playing games taken away from me...I feel cold... Maybe I shouldn't drink any soda that day...
Praetorian Posted September 30, 2003 Posted September 30, 2003 Originally posted by STTCT That's a friggin long movie!! Yeah, but its worth EVERY MINUTE OF IT!!! Right now though, I'm looking forward to the next release. Two Towers Extended. 40 extra minutes of cinematic bliss. Oh Yeah!
Surfnshannon Posted September 30, 2003 Posted September 30, 2003 Face it...they are stealing money from us all!!!!! I'm tired of it...first we buy VHS, then VHS - REVISED - then its SE and then its widescreen and fullscreen and then there's DVD and then there SE DVD, Fullscreen and widescreen and then theres the extended edition and then in 10 years they will release on some tiny little microchip w/ some new "never before" seen scenes!!! ahhhhhhh /endrant
Praetorian Posted September 30, 2003 Posted September 30, 2003 Originally posted by STTCT Face it...they are stealing money from us all!!!!! I'm tired of it...first we buy VHS, then VHS - REVISED - then its SE and then its widescreen and fullscreen and then there's DVD and then there SE DVD, Fullscreen and widescreen and then theres the extended edition and then in 10 years they will release on some tiny little microchip w/ some new "never before" seen scenes!!! ahhhhhhh /endrant There are even more "never before" seen scenes?!?!?! Anyone have a time machine so I can go 10 years into the future to get the microchip version??? It's not stealing BTW. I'm very happy to spend my $ on LOTR. I don't think they have LOTR on VHS. I only bought the DVDs. And do they even have a fullscreen DVD?
swphreak Posted September 30, 2003 Posted September 30, 2003 wow... they should insert an intermission at a boring part of the movie or something...
Clefo Posted September 30, 2003 Posted September 30, 2003 Originally posted by Boba Rhett Three hours and Thirty minutes! [/b] That's metric time, its really 2 hours and 23 minutes in American
ckcsaber Posted September 30, 2003 Posted September 30, 2003 The longer it is, the more we get to see of Pelennor Fields...
Snafu7 Posted October 1, 2003 Posted October 1, 2003 Jeeze! Thats long! Oh I just saw the trailer for it today, here's the link if yo want to see it. http://channelevents.aol.com/movies/lotr_keyword/ oops already posted in the forum, didn't see that.
TieDefender75 Posted October 1, 2003 Posted October 1, 2003 Thats going to be quite the show eh? Like Chase said, i wont drink before the show so i can se it from beginning to end without interruption.
another_trooper Posted October 1, 2003 Posted October 1, 2003 Excellent, the more the better !! I just hope there wont be any long boring scenes with Frodo or golem. . .
Zygomaticus Posted October 1, 2003 Posted October 1, 2003 Sweet chocolates of heaven! This is gonna be good
Sherack Nhar Posted October 1, 2003 Posted October 1, 2003 Longer does not necessarily mean better. Didn't Peter Jackson swear that the theatrical release of the movies would never go beyond 180 minutes for any of the three volumes? Did they just forget or what?
Zygomaticus Posted October 1, 2003 Posted October 1, 2003 Originally posted by Sherack Nhar Longer does not necessarily mean better. Didn't Peter Jackson swear that the theatrical release of the movies would never go beyond 180 minutes for any of the three volumes? Did they just forget or what? Did he put it in writing and sign it? Otherwise, I'm sure he can do what he's doing now... Either way, I agree, longer doesn't mean better, but Peter Jackson hasn't disappointed me so far, and I don't expect him to any time in the future. Hence my excitement over this news.
Jared Posted October 3, 2003 Posted October 3, 2003 Originally posted by Boba Rhett Turns out Return of the King clocks in at... drum roll please, ... ... Three hours and Thirty minutes! Thank you and good night. sweeet *rubs hands together*
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.