Jump to content

Home

Sexual UN-education!


El Sitherino

Recommended Posts

Its like some sort of brainwashing

 

'What do you also hear will keep you safe?' she asked. 'Condoms,' they answered.

 

'Do they keep you safe?' she asked. 'No,' they chorused.

 

Why? is it so important for Bush to force his ideals on a nation? and why is he so against sex before marage?

 

ridiculus, most of the teenages will still have sex, they just won't use comdoms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by TiE 23

Keep one in your wallet, rip it open, roll it on, ready to go?

:p

Keeping it in your wallet is bad. And condoms tend to tear rather easily, it's kind of a strategy to get those things (or perhaps that's just a problem stuck with the mediums and larges.... *shrugs*)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm, I've just read the link.

 

With a bit of luck, these lying censor-happy morons will, by their own teaching, abstain themselves into extinction leaving the rest of us to make our own decisions. :rolleyes: Be they informed decisions or otherwise. ;)

 

Edit:

 

A recent report led by Californian Democratic Congressman Henry Waxman revealed some federally funded programmes taught pupils that Aids could be spread through sweat and tears, abortion led to sterility and suicide, pregnancy could result from touching someone's genitals and oral sex could give you cancer.

:indif:

 

B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Leper Messiah

the more you fight an enemy, the more like them you become, in Americas case that means becoming a nation governed by religious extremists.

 

It is quite true, when any leader starts twisting the words of a religion for their own ends it is a bad thing. George W Bush will soon be no better than the "terrorists" he is fighting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Herminator

It seems that marriage makes you immune to sexual transmittable diseases...

 

 

 

 

 

:confused:

They are saying, sex with one person is safer than 50 people having sex with one person.

 

I for one totally agree with sex after marriage......but in this day and time...that's just not gonna happen. A few will wait, sure, but overall...it's not going to happen. They are attempting to bring back a "safer" generation. You gotta admit, there's sluts and whores all over the places these days.

 

I'd prefer a society where I know when I marry my wife, that she has no chance of having STDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Besides; principles or not, your government shouldn't force lies onto you. I mean, if Bush wouldn't tell the people that aliens were staying in the White House, people would be angry at the government. But something like this IS acceptable? I don't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by RpTheHotrod

They are saying, sex with one person is safer than 50 people having sex with one person.

but would you prefer them having sex with one person unprotected and not being cautious, or them being protected and cautious about it?

 

Originally posted by RpTheHotrod

I for one totally agree with sex after marriage.

I agree with it too. Do I follow it? no.

 

Originally posted by RpTheHotrod

They are attempting to bring back a "safer" generation.

no what they're doing is neglecting to teach kids to be safe and spreading lies. I don't mind if a kid waits, but telling kids that condoms don't work, and sex before marriage will cause you to get cancer and whatever other crap they say, I don't agree with.

 

Originally posted by RpTheHotrod

You gotta admit, there's sluts and whores all over the places these days.

there have ALWAYS been sluts and whores, especially in the western societies.

 

Originally posted by RpTheHotrod

I'd prefer a society where I know when I marry my wife, that she has no chance of having STDs.

Abstinence has nothing to do with making society safer, it's just a belief and lifestyle. What they need to teach is safe sex, get yourself and your partner tested, take precautions.

 

Me, I get bloodtest. Myself and my partner, if she doesn't want to take one, then too bad for her, I will no longer bother with anything with her. But most girls are willing to do bloodtests and when we get that result of "you're clean" back, we express our love. Abstinence isn't the only way you can be 100% sure of being disease free, just get a blood test, everytime before I do it, blood test, even if we've done it before. Things happen ya know.

 

The thing is, just be careful and don't do stupid ****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah......that's stupid.

 

And I'm not sure what you mean by bringing back a safer generation RP...back in the day promiscuity was done, it just wasn't TALKED about, it was a quiet thing.

 

At least, back in early days of the U.S.

 

Back in ancient civilizations anyone of high rank/standing had sex with pretty much who they wanted when they wanted.

 

STD's became widespread mainly because most people didn't undestand them, and they thought that having sex with a virgin cured STD's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...