Monkey Mania Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 This deserves it. This is actually real! Loonatics! More Info Edit: Poster *thanks IG-64* I am sick right now. Warner Bros. should die!
IG-64 Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 How sure are you that this is real? This looks incredibly fake. [EDIT] Nevermind, now that you added the Yahoo link. This is now looking incredibly stupid. OMGWTFBBQ
IG-64 Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 Originally posted by TK-8252 ...I don't get it. It's a new cartoon series on WB kids with fubar vertions of classic characters to be more "cool".
Mike Windu Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 Feh. Character design looks like something from Powerpuff Girls... All I'm asking for is a Space Jam 2. Please?
abcd1234 Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 I used to love watching the old Looney Toons. That is the worst thing they have ever done.
Monkey Mania Posted February 17, 2005 Author Posted February 17, 2005 It is sad that they have to make the characters look evil. This is what leads to kids liking evil things and buying mature videogames.
El Sitherino Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 Originally posted by Monkey Mania It is sad that they have to make the characters look evil. This is what leads to kids liking evil things and buying mature videogames. What? Whatever drugs you're doing give them to me. "This is a kids show intended for kids today who are growing up in the Internet age, an age of technology, an age of hip, cool animation, and something that we hope will resonate with that age group," explained Sander Schwartz, president of Warner Bros. Animation, in a phone interview from Hollywood. HA. Anyway they look like crap and I hope the designers are shot.
Mike Windu Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 It is sad that they have to make the characters look evil. This is what leads to kids liking evil things and buying mature videogames. What are you on dude? The appearance of "Buzz Bunny" would have little influence on kid's enjoyment of evil things, say satanic sacrifices... The design is crap, but I'll still end up watching it.
El Sitherino Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 They don't look evil, dark maybe, but not evil. I say they have a batman kind of twist to them. And I doubt Batman can be blamed for kids being evil. Kids are naturally evil, even the sheltered ones. It's how they are, they're physically weak so they attack emotionally and mentally.
Mike Windu Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 Silly designers... they forgot to add pupils!
El Sitherino Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 Originally posted by Mike Windu Silly designers... they forgot to add pupils! Batman didn't have pupils! But yeah, I don't really like the design, but I'll watch the first few eps to see if it'll be any good. I doubt it but you never know.
Tyrion Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 Among the improvements that are really scoring with kids: Buzz (née Bugs) Bunny ejaculates a gooey stream of Pokemon characters every time one of his pals sneaks up on him, the Tazmanian Devil’s aberrant behavior can be temporarily cured by swallowing a handful of glowing “happy pills,” and a newly-muscled Porky Pig finally gives up his courtship of Petunia to chase Elmer Fudd around the spaceship., Buggs Buzz ejaculates a gooey stream of pokemon characters everytime someone sneaks up on him?It's like there's two cartoons being intertwined here, and they're held together by loads of semen. Evil, vile semen. Taz has to take happy pills? Porky Pig is flamboyantly gay with Elmer Fud? WB has officially lost it.
El Sitherino Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 ... That sounds like the makings of a very bad, or very good porn. We'd have to see how it panned out though.
Mike Windu Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 Maybe they'll teach the damn pokemon to speak english...
Mike Windu Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 I'd like the design better if they didn't curve the hands into little crescent like thingies...
IG-64 Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 I'd like the design better if they looked like this:
Nerd_Annhilator Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 What a stupid idea.... ****ING **** **** **** ****ING ASS **** STUPID **** ****
Mike Windu Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 Originally posted by IG-64 I'd like the design better if they looked like this: *pic* Fool! It's not 23rd Century-ish!
TiE23 Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 Looney Toons is doomed...... *sniffle* Im gonna miss em. *Remembers days of watching Road Runner cartoons everyday from when I was 4 to 7 years old* TiE
El Sitherino Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 TiE, when you speak 3rd person, you don't use the word I. I think you're all blowing this out of proportion. It could actually have great story, I wasn't keen on Batman Beyond, but it turned out rather well.
IG-64 Posted February 17, 2005 Posted February 17, 2005 Originally posted by InsaneSith TiE, when you speak 3rd person, you don't use the word I. I think you're all blowing this out of proportion. It could actually have great story, I wasn't keen on Batman Beyond, but it turned out rather well. Only because it had old batman hitting people with his cane. Terry sucked IMO.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.