Jump to content

Home

Getting rid of HK-47


vader815

Keep or destroy HK-47  

206 members have voted

  1. 1. Keep or destroy HK-47

    • Keep!!!! :)
      186
    • Destroy. :(
      20


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I almost want to dare any of the three people (so far) who have voted to have HK-47 destroyed instead of voting and running. :D

Posted

I love Hk but the thing is i dont think you he/she (beacuse he/she dosnt exactley have genitiles) shouldnt be able to tag along with you. He/she should still be in the story though with the exile, T3 should also go with the exile!

Posted
Getting rid of HK is as stupid as Getting rid of T3. You would get rid of 3PO would you? Besides HK is better than 3PO, he not only can do everything 3PO can (aside from complaining about violence) plus he can blow some sentients head off. Can you get any better than that?

 

Wtf are sentients it is always sed on kotor & it obviously is refring to am living thing thing such as the main charcther.

Posted
Three people? (Takes a look at the poll results)

THREE PEOPLE???

I JUST CAN'T BELIEVE MY EYES!!!

Now it's four. Another person decided to vote and run. :D
Posted
Wtf are sentients it is always sed on kotor & it obviously is refring to am living thing thing such as the main charcther.

 

You almost answered your own question: Sentients refer to living beings.

Posted

Threatening Statement: Too much gibberish makes my behavior core hurt. You will learn proper use of language, meatbags, unless you wish to serve as target practice for my new upgraded Charric.

Posted

Actually JK:

sen·tient

adj.

1. Having sense perception; conscious: “The living knew themselves just sentient puppets on God's stage” (T.E. Lawrence).

So a sentient would most likely mean a conscious creature. :)

Posted

Can you guys please answer me a question? How are you going to rebuild HK47 if he doesn't get destroyed first? Huh? Huh?

 

The only correct answer is of course *both*, but since this is no possible choice I vote for destruction.

Posted
Now it's four. Another person decided to vote and run. :D

Why? Oh, why??!! (Damn it, now it's five!!)

 

It's very interesting how those who voted for HK's destruction don't want to explain their decision (except Buzz1978, though I don't quite understand why he thinks HK will be destroyed between K2 and the possible K3), they don't want to face the majority who voted to keep him. Or did those few people vote for HK's destruction only to annoy the rest of us?

Posted

Buzz, why not just keep him in the first place? If you have a good reason to vote to not have him at all in K3 (this is the question), then please, speak your mind, or forever hold your peace. Oops, unintentional cross-reference to weddings...

Posted

We do. So he "lives" no matter what happens between K2 and K3, and beyond. Though personally I don't like to think about his appearance in Galaxies, or what kind of mal-logic was used to justify it.

Posted
Why? Oh, why??!! (Damn it, now it's five!!)
This shows why you can't please everybody.

 

It's very interesting how those who voted for HK's destruction don't want to explain their decision (except Buzz1978, though I don't quite understand why he thinks HK will be destroyed between K2 and the possible K3), they don't want to face the majority who voted to keep him. Or did those few people vote for HK's destruction only to annoy the rest of us?
I'm actually looking for someone to say that they just can't stand HK-47.
Posted

C-3PO and HK-47 can't and shouldn't be compared. They are both great characters in their different ways. 3PO was a great comedy relief for the SW movies and HK is a great one (besides looking cool and evil) for the game. HK would just be too funny for the movies. I mean just imagine a movie scene with HK instead of 3PO (example, Bespin, the scene where Chewie attaches the droid's head backwards:''You stupid Wookie, when I'm fully reassembled I'll personally turn you into a rug. It will be painful for you, but very satisfying for me!'').

Posted
Buzz, why not just keep him in the first place? If you have a good reason to vote to not have him at all in K3 (this is the question), then please, speak your mind, or forever hold your peace. Oops, unintentional cross-reference to weddings...

Man, how can anyone take this serious? This whole thread is a joke.

Let's say if I see that 95% voted for something I can't do anything else but vote against it. It's a habit or a Advocatus Diaboli sort of thing and unlike the other four guys I stand up for it.

Sorry about ... no, wait a minute ... I'm not sorry. Well, sorry for not being sorry...

 

For me HK47 isn't so much of a C3PO but more a Marvin - a more aggressive one that is. And as much as I like to see him return I like to see him suffer...

Posted

Yes Prime. Had I known that people would have vited against HK I would have glady ripped out their computer's entrails right then.

Still I think the poll shows in of itself that there are a lot of people who just love HK and those that for some reason or other just hate everything about him from the look of his head to his murdering personality.

Posted

The only question left unanswered is why do those five people hate HK? I mean that's just... well... almost impossible, thanks to those five.

 

Kidding aside, I would really like to hear their reasons, instead of being stunned and confused by their votes.

Posted
Kidding aside, I would really like to hear their reasons, instead of being stunned and confused by their votes.
Oh, so would I. I would find it assuming. Besides, they should have nothing to be afraid of. This is a message board and flaming is against the rules. ;):D
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

keep that funny robot he s hillarious :)

 

statement: master should i kill winny meatbags for you? no hk help me pass my exam eliminate my proffesor that s an order :)))

 

Edit by Darth333: double posts merged

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...