Dagobahn Eagle Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 I have no idea who this Bill Donohue is, but he's made global headlines by attacking a full-size crucified Jesus Christ - made out of chocolate and wearing nothing but a chocolate smile. Call me a cold-hearted ole atheist, but I personally cannot understand how this chocolate messiah is so offensive. Is it that it's naked? That it's made out of chocolate? That he's dark-skinned? Bill Donahue, completely out of perspective with the rest of the "assaults on Christian sensibilities in the world", calls it "one of the worst assaults on Christian sensibilities ever". What are your opinions? Oh, and forgive me for the thread's title (a fundamentalist a spokesman for Catholics?). I seriously need sleep and I guess my brain's partly shut itself down for the day:o. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jae Onasi Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 I think it was the fact that he was naked. I think it's kind of tasteless (pun not intended), but I don't feel particularly offended. He was naked on the cross, after all. Doing it up in chocolate is kind of a weird media, but oh well. I'm trying desperately to keep my mind out of the gutter about what happens as one eats their way through the chocolate anatomy [Jae failz, loses a Purity Point] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gargoyle King Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 I have no idea who this Bill Donohue is, but he's made global headlines by attacking a full-size crucified Jesus Christ - made out of chocolate and wearing nothing but a chocolate smile. Personally, i think the guy is a whacko for doing so! Call me a cold-hearted ole atheist, but I personally cannot understand how this chocolate messiah is so offensive. Is it that it's naked? That it's made out of chocolate? That he's dark-skinned? Well different people have different opinions on this, its hard to define what is offensive anymore really. Bill Donahue, completely out of perspective with the rest of the "assaults on Christian sensibilities in the world", calls it "one of the worst assaults on Christian sensibilities ever". What are your opinions? I suppose i can see his point in someway. Oh, and forgive me for the thread's title (a fundamentalist a spokesman for Catholics?). I seriously need sleep and I guess my brain's partly shut itself down for the day:o. Only one answer for that then, GET SOME SLEEP DUDE!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mace MacLeod Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 I believe the expression is: "There's no such thing as bad publicity." And between some Christians and Muslims, indignant moral outrage seems to be a perpetual lifestyle choice. [totally off-topic]Man, Kavar's Corner really cleaned this place out... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samnmax221 Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 I'm personally waiting for the Mohammad Jawbreaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hallucination Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 The problem is that the Jesus statue contains peanuts, and Bill Donohue thinks it's wrong that someone could hurt himself by chewing on the chocolaty Saviour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Det. Bart Lasiter Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 It should have been made from white chocolate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jae Onasi Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 The problem is that the Jesus statue contains peanuts, and Bill Donohue thinks it's wrong that someone could hurt himself by chewing on the chocolaty Saviour. I checked the ingredient list--those weren't peanuts, Hall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tk102 Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 I have no idea who this Bill Donohue is, but he's made global headlines by attacking a full-size crucified Jesus Christ Lucky him. I can only attack these little chocolate eggs. I'd take communion everyday -- what a great incentive chocolate host wafers would be. I personally cannot understand how this chocolate messiah is so offensive. Is it that it's naked? That it's made out of chocolate? That he's dark-skinned? Actually he's pissed because he made Jesus hollow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hallucination Posted April 11, 2007 Share Posted April 11, 2007 I checked the ingredient list--those weren't peanuts, Hall. I was taking ED's word for it, I guess someone should tell him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.