Taak Farst Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 Like the new season of House, which starts at 8pm Tuesday on Fox? _EW_ thats strange, unless ur getting a series 5 now - coz we in england just had series 4. I luv that programme - but usually dislike hospital soaps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blix Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 I remember seeing a preview for it while at Clone Wars and it said the release date was to be around Fall 2008 (iirc) then I looked it up on Wikipedia and that's when I got the bad news. Also I wasn't aware Deathly Hollows was going to be a two-parter, they will likely film both parts at the same time but release them separately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taak Farst Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 I remember seeing a preview for it while at Clone Wars and it said the release date was to be around Fall 2008 (iirc) then I looked it up on Wikipedia and that's when I got the bad news. Also I wasn't aware Deathly Hollows was going to be a two-parter, they will likely film both parts at the same time but release them separately. are u sayin they will release half of deathly hallows - do some to be continued crap - then release it like 3 months into future? CRIME, CRIME AGAINST FILM INDUSTRY - I HOPE MY THEORY IS WRONG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astor Posted September 22, 2008 Author Share Posted September 22, 2008 are u sayin they will release half of deathly hallows - do some to be continued crap - then release it like 3 months into future? CRIME, CRIME AGAINST FILM INDUSTRY - I HOPE MY THEORY IS WRONG That's exactly right. I don't agree with splittign it into two, but then again, they're doing it to The Hobbit as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnseyy Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 I don't get the problem with that... suuure costs more money, but I'm a devoted fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taak Farst Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 That's exactly right. I don't agree with splittign it into two, but then again, they're doing it to The Hobbit as well. Just thinking...actually it may be beneficial. If it's so long that they splitting it into 2 - then maybe theyre going into the detail of the book? Same with The Hobbit maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Posted September 25, 2008 Share Posted September 25, 2008 Well the thing with the 7th movie is, they can't cut anything from the book out because it's all so important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIGH ON PIE 14 Posted September 25, 2008 Share Posted September 25, 2008 Well the thing with the 7th movie is, they can't cut anything from the book out because it's all so important. Exactly, the other books had lot of sub plots that could be cut out without changing the general story. The 7th book is pretty much one big plot. While I won't enjoy the wait between films, I am supportive of the idea. What I enjoy most about the HP books are all the side stories and such, something the movies cut out because they would make it too long. This should allow more detail to be put in...but now they have no excuse for editing out tons of good stuff. ~HOP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revan 411 Posted September 25, 2008 Share Posted September 25, 2008 Meh. The 7th book was kinda disappointing (In my opinion) It just seemed like JK Rolling was just killing off characters just for the sake of darkness. And also, it dragged on in the middle. The only thing great about it was the Epilogue. Goblet Of Fire, however is pretty much my favorite Harry Potter book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.