Surfnshannon Posted July 7, 2003 Share Posted July 7, 2003 1. Why are people on the forum allowed to call others f ucking imbeciles. 2 Why is everyone punished when only a few are the ones who abuse For example the point system. 3. Why is the accusation made that the store buying thing for changing other's custom titles was not meant for changing anyone's title. When in that option it had even said buy it for someone who can't change their's with a winking smiley? You know awhile back I said we didn't need strict outlining rules that are universal to the forum - but we do. Its not fair that others get away with stuff that some forumers are banned for. Thanks for listening - Shan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZBomber Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 I don't think anyone has been banned from the things you listed. The Credits thing was just waiting to be stopped. I knew it wasn't a good idea form the beggining. And so did a lot of others. But the rest of us aren't suffering. We mgiht get an even better mod planted into LF. About the swearing thing, I guess its ok, as long as both people know they are joking, and no offence is taken. Most people know what the wordd are anyways. I'm not sure about the Title thing. I think that it was made for a joke for some people, but, once all those points were given out, it got way out of control. Um... thanks for reading my reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Shutt Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Originally posted by STTCT 1. Why are people on the forum allowed to call others f ucking imbeciles. For anyone having trouble keeping up, "people on the forum" = me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antilles_CL Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Originally posted by ZBomber I don't think anyone has been banned from the things you listed. The Credits thing was just waiting to be stopped. I knew it wasn't a good idea form the beggining. And so did a lot of others. But the rest of us aren't suffering. We mgiht get an even better mod planted into LF. About the swearing thing, I guess its ok, as long as both people know they are joking, and no offence is taken. Most people know what the wordd are anyways. I'm not sure about the Title thing. I think that it was made for a joke for some people, but, once all those points were given out, it got way out of control. Um... thanks for reading my reply. I'm with Z on all of these...The points...heh they need to be gone...And for the swearing it isn't too big of an issue as long as no ones else takes it wrongly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbguy1211 Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Originally posted by Carl Shutt For anyone having trouble keeping up, "people on the forum" = me. If the shoe fits... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-=ReApEr=- Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 All these problems have been addressed, and once again there comming up again. Someone needs to set the record straight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antilles_CL Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Originally posted by pbguy1211 If the shoe fits... Then give it to your neighbor because it'll probably do them more good than iy would you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwing Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Originally posted by pbguy1211 If the shoe fits... Um, he wasn't saying it was a false accusation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antilles_CL Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Ohh...Well then eat the shoe by golly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZBomber Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Originally posted by Semicolon I'm with Z on all of these...The points...heh they need to be gone...And for the swearing it isn't too big of an issue as long as no ones else takes it wrongly. Thanks Smook-Ums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-=ReApEr=- Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Lol, i agree with z as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antilles_CL Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Smook Ums! w00t! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbguy1211 Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Originally posted by Semicolon Ohh...Well then eat the shoe by golly! *chomp chomp* needs salt... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antilles_CL Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Hands the man some salt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfnshannon Posted July 8, 2003 Author Share Posted July 8, 2003 Thanks for craping up my thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Gnarly Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Originally posted by STTCT Thanks for craping up my thread. It happens STTCT.....and i know its annoying, and its always the same 3 people just trying to get more posts... anyways ill try to answer some of your questions. 1. To my knoladge most of th epeople that do that are from forums that have few or no admins/ mods in there that care, or are encourageing it. 2. Like the old saying STTCT One bad apple can rune(sp?) the whole basketp Or however it goes...you get the point 3. Thats what happened to me, luckily i didnt get in to much trouble for it i remember your Rung founddation idea and so i did it. When in that option it had even said buy it for someone who can't change their's with a winking smiley? Thats what I've been trying to tell people (erhm...LeXX) but they (LeXX) kept calling me a ****ing Liar and not to Bull**** them, now you know im right and your wrong :p. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZBomber Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Originally posted by STTCT Thanks for craping up my thread. Hey, you didn't thank me for answering your questions. I said this before, but I don't think the wink was meant to be used as a "naughty" way. I think it was like a friendly type of thing, but I could be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Gnarly Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 First of all, your answers where wrong. And what is your point? example(s) I said this before, but I don't think the wink was meant to be used as a "naughty" way. I think it was like a friendly type of thing, but I could be wrong. Hands the man some salt Smook Ums! w00t! *chomp chomp* needs salt... If the shoe fits... Lol, i agree with z as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfnshannon Posted July 8, 2003 Author Share Posted July 8, 2003 No I didn't mind your post z - I understand lots of people supposidly didn't like the credits.. 1. agree wi/mamba 2. Were the credits really that bad???? I thought they were fun! 3. I soooo wish I had a pic of that thing in the store - I KNOW that was what that smiley meant and they can keep denying it - but you can't tell me that it meant ;-) Change someone's if they ask you - that is sooo b.s. I'm just upset at how things are being handled. I like a lot of Mod's etc. I'm just wondering where in the world they dissapeared to and why they are putting up with this crap AND why are they being hypocritical? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Gnarly Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 I know Shan, i read that thing and thought this way no one will be mad, i wish that i had a pic also because everyone keeps calling me a liar about it (Jed220) and it annoys the hell outta me. I swear i had a feeling that i shouldve taken a pic but never did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leXX Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Originally posted by Mamba McFly Thats what I've been trying to tell people (erhm...LeXX) but they (LeXX) kept calling me a ****ing Liar and not to Bull**** them, now you know im right and your wrong :p. If your gonna quote an IRC conversation with me, at least do it right. I said "don't talk bullshit" and "fking grow up". To answer your questions STTCT: 1. They aren't. It is against the rules. 2. People are not being punished by the removal of the point system. Some of the features will remain free of charge. It is being replaced by something much better. The point system was a bad idea to begin with and caused nothing but trouble from the start. It has outlived it's life. 3. The wink at the end of the sentence was not an invitation to change peoples titles without their permission. It was a "friendly" wink. In other words, it was indicating that you would be doing someone a kind gesture by donating them a title that they would not otherwise have. And if anyone else spam's up this thread, or any other thread here for that matter, I'm gonna start banning people. You have been warned. This is the help/feedback center, not an aol chat room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Gnarly Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Originally posted by leXX If your gonna quote an IRC conversation with me, at least do it right. I said "don't talk bullshit" and "fking grow up". [not_spam] same 2 words right? i didnt see a unquote thingy around them?[/not_spam] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZBomber Posted July 8, 2003 Share Posted July 8, 2003 Originally posted by Mamba McFly First of all, your answers where wrong. And what is your point? example(s) WTF are you talking about? My answers seemed right, and unless you show some proof, I'm gonna keep knowing they are right. What are you trying to show by those quotes anyways? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwing Posted July 9, 2003 Share Posted July 9, 2003 Originally posted by leXX 3. The wink at the end of the sentence was not an invitation to change peoples titles without their permission. It was a "friendly" wink. In other words, it was indicating that you would be doing someone a kind gesture by donating them a title that they would not otherwise have. Actually, leXX, the other message "You have changed [user]'s title to [title]. Will [user] like it? ;)" coupled with the original did kinda give the whole thing a "prank" flavoring. =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swphreak Posted July 9, 2003 Share Posted July 9, 2003 You forgot the "Ain't I cute?" part. The idea I got from the wink was to retitle the person as a prank. And if it was against the rules, I didn't see it listed anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.